APACHE LICENSE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Free Beer and Free Speech Thomas Krichel
Advertisements

Open Source & Research Brought to you by: Office of Technology Licensing Office of the General Counsel Stanford University Jim DeGraw Ray Zado Ropes &
Platinum Sponsors Gold Sponsors Navigating the Open Source Legal Waters Presenter: Jeff Strauss August 14, 2013.
Is Free Software Really Free? Dan Or-Hof, Adv. Or-Hof Tech & IP Law
Copyleft and cathedrals How the counterculture is changing the way we do business.
The Importance of Open Source Software Networking 2002 Washington, D.C. April 18, 2002 Carol A. Kunze Napa, California.
A DAPT IST Dissemination and Use Plan Revised version Ricardo Jiménez-Peris Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Open Source/Free Software Source code is available Extensible Can be changed, modified Freely distributed Copies Modified versions Alternatives to commercial/proprietary.
CWG2 on Tools, guidelines and procedures Licensing Adriana Telesca on behalf of the CWG2 December, 5 th 2014.
Jul The New Geant4 License J. Perl The New Geant4 License Makes clear the user’s wide- ranging freedom to use, extend or redistribute Geant4, even.
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Open-Source Software ISYS 475.
+ Andrés Guadamuz SCRIPT Centre for Research in IP and Technology Law, Edinburgh, UK Proprietary, Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), and Mixed Platforms.
COMP 6005 An Introduction To Computing Session Two: Computer Software Acquiring Software.
1 EPICS EPICS Licensing BESSY, May 2002 Andrew Johnson.
Licenses A Legal Necessity Copyright © 2015 – Curt Hill.
Creative Commons, Copyright and Education Part 3. Introduction to Creative Commons Rowan Wilson OUCS November 2009.
1 Patent Rights & Open Source Software Roger G. Brooks April 29,
OPEN SOURCE AND FREE SOFTWARE. What is open source software? What is free software? What is the difference between the two? How the two differs from shareware?
Copyright Basics. Intellectual Property Intellectual Property is a unique product or idea created by an individual or organization. Common types of protection.
Andrew McNab - License issues - 10 Apr 2002 License issues for EU DataGrid (on behalf of Anders Wannanen) Andrew McNab, University of Manchester
Distribution in Open Source Martin von Haller Groenbaek partner, Bender von Haller Dragsted ITECHLAW ASIA 2010 Bangalore, 5 February 2010.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Software Licences HSF Recommendations John Harvey / CERN 24 June 2015
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Licensing in NAMIC 3 requirements from NCBC RFA (paraphrased)
1 European Open source Lawyers Event Paris, Capitale du Libre 24 September 2008 Philippe LAURENT Researcher at the CRID (Research Centre on IT and Law)
Unrestricted Derivative Works Scott Bradner
How to Use The Creative Commons Licenses. [formats]
Chapter 3: Understanding Software Licensing
Group E - Enrico Costanza Sam Holder, Jonathan Stephens-Jones, Joseph Buckingham, Crispin Clark, Benjamin Dixon Creative Commons, Open Source, Open Movements.
CERN – IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Copyright and Content Tim SMITH Invenio User Group Workshop, CERN, Oct 2015.
Geospatial Information: Copyright Issues Professor George Cho Professor of Geoinformatics and the Law University of Canberra
Free Software - Introduction to free software and the GPL Copyright © 2007 Marcus Rejås Free Software Foundation Europe I hereby grant everyone the right.
Open Source Software Practices Quiz #8 October
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
1 Open Source Software Licensing ● Bruce Perens, ● Perens LLC ● One of the founders of the Open Source movement in software.
Opening Windows to a Wider World Why Samba moved to GPLv3 Jeremy Allison Samba Team
Open Hardware: Why and How
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Copyright material does not permit reproducing the material, publicly displaying or performing it, or engaging in any of the acts reserved for the copyright.
Open Source Software Practices
Getting Started A Step by Step Guide.
Open Source software Licensing
Copyright and Open Licensing
Open Source Software in Academia
Open Hardware Licensing
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Open Source Software: Top 10 Myths that Every In-House, Government, & Private Practice Lawyer Should Know 2017 NAPABA Convention Washington, D.C.
December 10th, 2016 Hideki Yamane
What is Copyright?.
Open Source Software Legal and Other Issues related to use
Open Source Software Licenses
Open Source Software Keenan Zuraiz
Automation in an XML Authoring Environment
Welcome to the rebuild slide master
MOZILLA LICENSE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION
Contracts A Step by Step Guide.
Scenarios of Co-existence Between Proprietary and Open Source Software – Incentives and Implications Andrés Guadamuz AHRC Research Centre for Studies in.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
FREE SOFTWARE DEFINITION
Yuhao Wu1, Yuki Manabe2, Daniel M. German3, Katsuro Inoue1
Reno WordPress Meetup February 12, 2015.
GNU General Public License (GPL)
COPYLEFT THE TERM The Term copyleft was forged upon the traditional copyright term by opposing the word right (which in English means both right meant.
Open Source Development Challenges
Responsibility of Text free of restrictions
By: Amy Han, Wyndham Hubbard, and Jennifer Webb
© Healthcare Inspirations. All rights reserved
CSPA Common Statistical Production Architecture Description of the Business aspects of the architecture: business models for sharing software Carlo Vaccari.
CSPA Common Statistical Production Architecture Description of the Business aspects of the architecture: business models for sharing software Carlo Vaccari.
Presentation transcript:

APACHE LICENSE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION The Apache License 1.0 was the original Apache License which applies only to older versions of Apache packages The Apache License 1.1 was approved by the ASF in 2000: The primary change from the 1.0 license is in the 'advertising clause' (section 3 of the 1.0 license); derived products are no longer required to include attribution in their advertising materials, but only in their documentation. The ASF adopted the Apache License 2.0 in January 2004. The stated goals of the license included making the license easier for non-ASF projects to use, improving compatibility with GPL-based software, allowing the license to be included by reference instead of listed in every file, clarifying the license on contributions, and requiring a patent license on contributions that necessarily infringe a contributor's own patents.

APACHE LICENSE LICENSING CONDITION Like any free software license, the Apache License allows the user of the software the freedom to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software, under the terms of the license. The Apache License is PERMISSIVE, so it does not require modified versions of the software to be distributed using the same license NON-COPYLEFT LICENSE. In every licensed file, any original copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices in redistributed code must be preserved; and, in every licensed file changed, a notification must be added stating that changes have been made to that file. If a NOTICE text file is included as part of the distribution of the original work, then derivative works must include a readable copy of these notices , in at least one of three places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the derivative works, within the source form or documentation, or within a display generated by the derivative works (wherever such third-party notices normally appear). The contents of the NOTICE file do not modify the license, as they are for informational purposes only, and adding more attribution notices as addenda to the NOTICE text is permissible, provided that these notices cannot be understood as modifying the license. Modifications may have appropriate copyright notices, and may provide different license terms for the modifications. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, any contributions submitted by a license to a licensor will be under the terms of the license without any terms and conditions, but this does not preclude any separate agreements with the licensor regarding these contributions.

COMPATIBILITY WITH GNU GPL COMPATIBLE WITH GNU GPL v3 APACHE 2.0 NOT COMPATIBLE WITH GNU GPL v1-2 APACHE 1.0 APACHE 1.1 APACHE 2.0