Contractor Business System Rule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Management and the Contractor’s Property Management System
Advertisements

IND 205 Auditing a Contractors Property Management System TLO #9 Auditing a Contractors Property Management System.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Property Administration (PA) Capital Rehabilitation and Preventative Maintenance of Government Property Revision #, Date (of revision) Presented By: Mr.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
1 1 MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL CHALLENGES OF PROPOSED DFARS RULE ON PAYMENT WITHHOLDING OF CONTRACTORS' BUSINESS SYSTEMS DEFICIENCES Breakout Session #
0 Origin COWC Recommendation: Federal Acquisition Regulations should provide clear policy regarding the use of payment withholds on business system deficiencies.
Contractor Business System Rule Revision #, Date (of revision) Presented By: Kendrick Dickerson, PA, DCMA Property Group May 3, 2013.
Overviews of: The Business Systems Rule The UK Bribery Act Charles D. Chadwick DII Best Practices Forum June 23, 2011.
1 EVM Policy July 2013 NAVY CEVM 2 Outline DoDI DFARS DFARS DFARS June 2012 AT&L Policy Letter.
DCAA – Fort Walton Beach Branch Office
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Provisional Billing Rates
Audit Documentation PCAOB Auditing Standard no.3.
Basic Financial Requirements for DoD Government Contracting 2015 National SBIR/STTR Conference The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views.
Office of Business Development Training
Phase II Training Briefed By [CA insert name] For Quality Assurance Personnel.
SAS 112: The New Auditing Standard Jim Corkill Controller Accounting Services & Controls.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e PPNM’s/PNM’s Date: 29 Dec 2006.
Certification of Market Values STEB PROGRAM Briefing Points 2011 Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Thomas E. Marks, CPA Deputy Auditor General.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
WCI LEA UPDATE MAY 2, 2014 RI Department Of Education Wireless Classroom Initiative Cynthia Brown, Director Office of Statewide Efficiencies Craig Hockenbrough,
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
FAR PART 45 – Government Property
Encouraging Diversity Growth & Equity 123: Demonstration of Good Faith Todd McGonigle EDGE Program Manager Phone (614) FAX (614)
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Contractor Business Systems (CBS) Rule Eric Fassett.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Chief, Contingency Contracting 26 May 2005 Commercial Contract Financing.
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP EVM Status and Issues Michael Pelkey OUSD(AT&L) Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy 4 February
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year 15 October 2014.
NASA Procedural Requirement, Administration of Property in the Custody of Contractors NPR Michael (Mike) Showers 1.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services for the financial year October 2015.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Economic Development Department on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Ahmed Moolla October.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Service and Administration and Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation on the audit outcomes 14 October 2015.
Briefing to the portfolio committee: water and sanitation Audit outcomes of the portfolio for the financial year 14 October 2015.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Challenges Facing the Department of Transportation and the Office of Inspector General’s Strategy for.
Update on Recommendations from KPMG, Management Partners, and Task Force City Council Meeting November 16,
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Rural Development and Land Reform (DRDLR) Audit outcomes of the DRDLR portfolio 2 February 2016.
Briefing to the portfolio committee: Social Development Audit outcomes of the Social Development portfolio for the financial year October 2015.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenters:
2007 Office of Risk Management Annual Conference 2007 David M. Shapiro Disaster Planning & Recovery Consultants
Small Business Insight Into the Business System Review and Audit Process Business Systems Overview.
22 Presented by: Chad Braley, CEO & Managing Director Capital Edge Consulting Breakout Session D5 Date: November 6, 2012 Time: 11:15am-12:30 pm The Competitive.
2016 National SBIR/STTR Conference The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views and not necessarily the views of other DoD organizations.
Contract Management SB 20 Objective:  Provide basic overview of the contract process to employees  Give employees basic information on how to process.
TOPS TRAINING.
Consent to Subcontract
Auditing & Assurance Services, 6e
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee: Defence Audit outcomes of the Defence portfolio for the financial year October 2015.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Health Audit outcomes of the health portfolio and health sector for the financial year October 2014.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services audit outcomes for the financial year 14 October 2015.
Montclair State University Affirmative Action Requirements
Office of the Inspector General
EVM 202—Lesson 3 EVMS Guidelines and Compliance
Setting Actuarial Standards
See next slide for content
IIT PNC VISA Procurement Card
Commercial Contract Financing
Managing Federal grants
Overview of Compliance, Surveillance, and Integrated Baseline Reviews
EVM Policy NAVY CEVM July 2013
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Defence on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Police Audit outcomes of the Police portfolio for the financial year 13 October 2015.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Department of Correctional Services on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Solly Jiyana.
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Contractor Business System Rule Presented By: Cynthia Thrailkill, Director, DCMA Property Group June 27, 2012 Revision #, Date (of revision)

Basis for the Business System Rule Rule language Process Timelines TOPICS Basis for the Business System Rule Rule language Process Timelines Contractor Actions Q&A 2

Why a Business System Rule? Commission on Wartime Contracting (August 11, 2009): Contractor business systems with deficiencies “…remain uncorrected, without consequence, for months or even years” Contractors not held accountable Clauses are inadequate Immediate remedies not available to Contracting Officers No authority to hold accountable with CAP in place 3

Commission on Wartime Contracting Bottom Line “Defense agencies must improve their oversight of contractor business systems to reduce waste, fraud and abuse” Commission on Wartime Contracting 4

Accounting Property Purchasing MMAS Estimating EVMS Six Business Systems Accounting Property Purchasing MMAS Estimating EVMS 5

The DFARS Clause DFARS 252.245-7003(b): “The Contractor shall establish and maintain an acceptable property management system. Failure to maintain an acceptable property management system, as defined in this clause, may result in disapproval of the system by the Contracting Officer and/or withholding of payments” Contractor property management systems must still meet FAR/DFARS requirements and any contract terms and conditions 6

So..What’s Changed? Property Administrators will: No longer send PMSA results to contractors Send PMSA results to the ACO No longer determine systems as “adequate” or “inadequate” Continue to communicate findings to contractors during audits and at exit briefings Contracting Officers will: Approve the contractor’s system if there are no significant deficiencies Determine if contractor deficiencies (if any) are significant Request corrective action 7

Old Process vs. BSR Current Process BSR Implementation Property Administrator: Performs risk assessment Conducts Entrance Briefing Performs audit IAW risk plan Conducts Exit Briefing Sends Summary letter to contractor system status and requests corrective actions Performs re-analysis after corrective actions implemented Recommends Withdrawal of Limited Risk of Loss to CO if corrective action not taken Property Administrator: Performs risk assessment Conducts Entrance Briefing Performs audit IAW risk plan Conducts Exit Briefing Property Administrator submits report of significant deficiencies to ACO CO signs letter to contractor disapproving system and requesting corrective actions Advises CO of successful corrective action or significant deficiencies CO advises contractor of continued disapproval and withdrawal of Limited Risk of Loss 8

What is a Significant Deficiency? DFAR 252.242.7005(b) Significant deficiency “..in the case of a contractor business system, means a shortcoming in the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the Department of Defense to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed for management purposes”   9

The Process If the contractor does not correct the deficiencies, the CO follows FAR Part 45.105; i.e., withdraw assumption of risk, pursue other rights and remedies If DFARS clause 252.242-7005 is in the contract, the CO also pursues a financial withhold If the contractor’s system was previously approved, the CO would disapprove 10

Timelines 11

Contractor Actions Produce sound, clear, detailed procedures Develop robust self-assessment programs (required by FAR 52-245-1) Enables contractors to track their system and identify deficiencies prior to the Property Administrator performing the audit Identifying the deficiencies and implementing corrective actions provides contractors more “time” to work through the issues. Implement adequate corrective action Perform “root cause” analysis Ensure corrective actions adequately address the root cause of the problem to prevent future findings   12

Summary What does the business system rule mean to DCMA’s overall mission? Forces consistency of oversight; and Policy/people/tools What does the business system rule mean to DCMA’s property mission? Gives parity with respect to all other contractor business systems; all systems have equal status under the rule Enhances the importance of property system audits 13

Questions? 14