Construction Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Replacement of the Queens Approach Bronx-Whitestone Bridge
Advertisements

Constructability Review
Project Planning: Assembling a Mortenson “Integrated Work Plan”
Drawings of Sufficient Detail
Bangor Water Districts Experience With Gas. Bangor Water Districts Experience With Natural Gas.
Belt Line Project Cost Update May 27, Belt Line – Project Overview Undergrounding of aerial utilities – electrical and telecom Two Phases – Marsh.
Earthwork Operations & Equipments
Lander Streets and Utilities 2015 Public Meeting No. 2 McDougall & Cliff Project Area.
Dillon and Christina Project Area Lander Streets and Utilities 2015 Public Meeting No. 2.
City of Bloomfield Hills 2015 Road Improvement Program.
Public Information Meeting #6 City of Fargo Flood Risk Reduction Projects Rose Creek Coulee October 9, 2012.
MAJOR REVISIONS TO THE POLICY FOR ACCOMMODATING UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY RIGHTS Presented By: Mark Attaway March 29, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Site Preparation Lessons Learned Michael P. Bromfield, Construction Engineer Convention Facilities Advisory Committee Review.
MARCH 31, 2014 Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
Jess Albino Facility Advisory October 29, 2007 FACILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLENARY CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES UPDATE October.
NOVEMBER 11, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
AUGUST 19, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks StructurePoint November 20, 2013.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Project Background STIP update - City requests cancellation of US101 at Logan Road EA and proposes new modernization project: US101 at 32nd Street.
PIONEER HIGH SCHOOL WEST STADIUM PHASE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Erickson Hall (EHCC) was the awarded the Pioneer High School Phase 1 Construction Contract.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Discussion Topics Construction Contract Administration Lessons Learned Other Construction Issues Questions? / Comments (Anytime)
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Electric Infrastructure Workshop Gulf Power Company January 23, 2006.
Dan Frasier, PE, CCP Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction Projects Successful Turnover of New and Renovation Construction.
Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Ring Building Construction Status Michael P. Bromfield Construction Engineer NSLS II Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
The following advertisement is created for the sole purpose of understanding the Commissioning process. The following advertisement is created for the.
MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL COMPLEX 3/22/10 Update.
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
Design Intent Phase Design Intent Phase Determine what the design intent is and how the building is to operate when it is complete. Determine what the.
Stacy Hagenbucher.  Process Improvements  Clarification  Trends  Finals Tracking  Trends  Why Missing Dates  Additional Resource  Issues on sites.
WEDGEWOOD COVE HOA STREET PAVING/RESURFACING PROJECT.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
McDonough Bolyard Peck Educational Series Building Commissioning Presented by: Doug Wrenn Steve Baxter July
P ART A - S TANDARDS A NNUAL ‘A’ B OOK R EVIEW  Conducted by City of Toledo -Division of Engineering Services  Review Typically performed in Q4.
WP 17.1 Civil Engineering Platform height / vs option Status on M. Manfredi on behalf of WP17.1 team.
The purpose of the US 53 project is to address the termination of the 1960 easement agreement that affects the current highway location in order to continue.
Contractor Utility Coordination WisDOT Projects February 18 th, 2016.
Construction Review LaVon M. Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 21, 2016.
Public Information Meeting St. George Road - Oak Hill Road Intersection Reconstruction Project.
Pier Partial GMP Proposal for Marine Structural June 1, 2017
CBETA Project ALD’s Cost and Schedule Review February 6, 2017
2nd Street Drainage and Paving Improvements
Hays County Commissioners Court
The Alabama Transportation Rehabilitation and Improvement Program
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Eligible Services and Fiber Options for Service Providers
Construction Oversight
Local communities and municipalities
107th & 110th Avenue North Public Utilities Renewal Projects
Engineering Major Projects: Raleigh Office Minor Projects: Division Office -This is a NCDOT policy, not a FHWA policy; it’s meant to avoid conflicts of.
Pinole-Hercules Water Pollution Control Plant Upgrade Project
Successfully Integrating NEPA and Environmental Permitting into a DoD Hazardous Waste Treatment Facility Construction Project to Meet Budget and Schedule.
Construction Review.
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)
Second Avenue Subway Project Execution Strategy
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Program Update
10-hr. Construction – Cranes
2019 Fueling Stations Upgrade Bloomington, Orono (& CHS) – Best Price
Presentation transcript:

Construction Area Engineer’s Perspective on Effective Utility Coordination

Construction Considerations Timing of Letting Utility Work in Advance of the Letting Accessibility and Clearance of Construction Equipment – Aerial Vertical and Horizontal Clearance – Underground

Construction Considerations Schedule – Critical Path, Concurrent Operations Ongoing Coordination and Communications Through Relocation Completion

Timing of Letting April 1 – October 1 cannot clear trees due to permit restrictions related to endangered bats Assume 1 month minimum from Letting to NTP plus 2 weeks to mobilize, get subs approved Total lead time from letting to start of construction is 6 weeks, minimum. February letting is cutting it close, March lettings will not have time for clearing prior to April 1. Workarounds – Separate clearing Contract or Owner self perform clearing prior to letting (address this in bid documents)

Utility Work in Advance of Letting Update utilities RSP 107-R-169 prior to letting with latest information regarding utilities commitments/deadlines/requirements If a utility performs and completes relocation work in advance of the letting, ensure this information is conveyed to bidders If a utility work plan is updated close to the letting date, ensure RSP 107-R-169 is updated, as well (pre-letting revision process)

Accessibility and Clearance of Construction Equipment – Aerial Assess equipment needs for construction Cranes – boom, swing Pile driving Beam Setting Excavators Pipe and structure installation What are OSHA Vertical and Horizontal Clearances for Power Lines??? Dependent on voltage Verify with the utility and take into account

Vertical and Horizontal Clearance – Underground Operations to consider Pipe and pipe structures (manholes, inlets, catch basins) Foundations – signal, sign, lighting, bridge, box culverts, wingwalls, MSE walls, retaining walls Piling Conduits / wiring

Vertical and Horizontal Clearance – Underground Operations to consider Fence along R/W – fence installers will not auger within 3 feet of a located utility. HAND DIGGING IS EXPENSIVE!!! Guardrail Undercutting soft soils Subgrade treatment with chemical modification

Schedule – Critical Path, Concurrent Operations Utility relocation critical path needs to be identified by the utility coordinator and communicated to the project team Coordinate with multiple utilities to work simultaneously where possible Identify which construction operations can commence during utility relocation phase and identify limitations

Schedule – Critical Path, Concurrent Operations Condense relocation schedules, where possible Communicate opportunities/requirements to bidders to sequence operations and work concurrently with utility relocation efforts Unique special provisions Project phasing

Coordination Through Completion Communicate Critical Path areas and utilities of concern to: Project Owner Project Manager Construction Area Engineer Designer (Manage expectations!!!) Give the team all information needed to combat challenges before they become schedule and budget busters!

Coordination Through Completion Inspection during relocation is critical to ensure plans are properly executed, conflicts are avoided, and schedules are met Mitigation is KEY! Ongoing communication with the project team during relocation efforts Hold regular utility progress meetings until completed

Contract Documents If it is not in the contract documents, the contractor cannot know about it and cannot bid it! Uncertainty = Risk = More $$$ in the bids

Past Experience – Lessons Learned Relocated electric transmission line Bridge piling directly below, crane clearance not anticipated Second, reimbursable temporary relocation required

Past Experience – Lessons Learned Aerial Electric Line slightly offset from new storm sewer trunkline OSHA minimum clearance could not be maintained More timely option was to change storm sewer from planned location Had to thread the needle with numerous underground utilities and close roadway to open cut Cost ~ $260K

Past Experience – Lessons Learned MSE Wall Excavation and Backfill Utility Coordination eliminated conflict with MSE wall and leveling pad at crossing points Length and depth of backfill (Strap Length) was not accounted for Communication utility had to be suspended in mid-air for full excavation and backfill to occur Cost ~ $64K (support) + backfill inefficiency cost (still in dispute)

MSE Wall Plan View

MSE Wall Profile View Taller Wall = longer straps Notice steps in leveling pad

Suspended Duct Bank “(4-4” PVC in Duct)”…

Suspended Duct Bank

MSE Walls Consider not just where a utility interfaces with an MSE wall, but also where the utility interfaces with the MSE wall excavation and backfill zone, which extends a great distance behind the MSE wall

More Lessons Learned

Consider Power Service Points Provide signal and lighting plans to utilities If they do not have all the plans, they cannot develop relocation plans that provide service

Ensure Utilities Follow the Plan If a utility says they are going to go aerial, make sure they INTEND to go aerial Clearing costs are incurred unnecessarily if the utility ends up boring through a formerly wooded area, for example

Long Relocation Timeframes Contractors bid what they are given in RSP 107-R-169, so if a long relocation timeframe is stated, bidders must assume the utility will take the entire time Work with utilities to MINIMIZE stated timeframes to something REASONABLE