File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEORIES OF SECONDARY LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT Contributory Infringement Contributory Infringement (1) With knowledge of direct infringing activity (2)
Advertisements

Secondary Liability Under U.S. Copyright Law Paula Pinha, Attorney-Advisor U.S. Copyright Office East Africa Regional Seminar on: Copyright Enforcement.
Anthony Bonanni. Introduction  Traditional way for artists to make money was by revenue from album sales.  Album sales are decreasing yearly.  One.
Thad Davis - Damian Forbes - Jessica Salins - Oscar Sandoval.
New Developments in E- Commerce: Legal Issues Professor Nancy King Oregon State University Aarhus School of Business.
Robin Hood and the 40 Million Thieves David Evans
Ethics and Legal Issues in Computing
Copyright Infringement Present by: Shao-Chuan Fang Jaime McDermott Emily Nagin Michael Piston Fan Yang Carnegie Mellon Group Presentation Date:
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 26 (APRIL 22, 2002)
Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.
Secondary Liability & ISP Liability Limitations Ben Hardman Attorney - Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement USPTO.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 4, 2009 Copyright – Indirect, Digital Issues.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 1, 2008 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Copyright and P2P Edward W. Felten Dept. of Computer Science Princeton University.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 1, 2007 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Grokster Bart Wagner. Shut Down Grokster, which lost in the Supreme Court a lawsuit filed by Hollywood to stop illegal file sharing on peer-to-peer networks,
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 4, 2008 Copyright – Digital Issues.
Port 21 (Distribution and Promotion Remix) Brian Geoghagan Winter 2005 COM546 Professor Gill.
Feb. 7, 2005IS 296A: Sony Betamax case1 Sony v. Universal Pamela Samuelson IS 296A(2) February 7, 2005.
Week 3: File sharing.
Indirect Infringement Prof Merges Agenda Indirect Liability Remedies (briefly)
P2P NETWORKS Legal Risks. Who’s On First Identity crisis Each computer can be client Each computer can be server “Servent”
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 31, 2007 Copyright – Indirect Liability.
P2P File Sharing: The Digital Dilemma ITED 8100 Group Project: Cathie Arnold, Melissa Barker, and Allen Bullock.
Intellectual Property Part 2 Copyright and Fair Use
1 CPTWG MEETING #91 September 8, 2005 Legislative/Regulatory Update Jim Burger CPTWG MEETING #91 September 8, 2005 Legislative/Regulatory.
Intellectual Property Rights Online File Sharing Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez Brett Colbert Wendi Jardin Victor Cortez.
Client-Server vs P2P or, HTTP vs Bittorrent. Client-Server Architecture SERVER client.
Finishing Up Fair Use; More on Copyright
1 CPTWG MEETING #96 April 18, 2006 Legislative/Regulatory Update Jim Burger CPTWG MEETING #96 April 18, 2006 Legislative/Regulatory.

IP part 2: fair use, the music cases, other kinds of IP CS 340.
Intellectual Property Part 2 Copyright and Fair Use
CS110: Computers and the Internet Intellectual Property.
Copyright in Cyberspace
Copyright Law An Review on Computer Music Files and P2P File Sharing.
Online Privacy, Government, and Intellectual Property Rouda’s CSCI 101 class.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 38 How Music Sharing and File Sharing Work.
Chapter 4: Intellectual Property in CyberSpace CS 340.
Audio Technology from a Legal Perspective “Running Afoul of Patent and Copyright Laws” Kevin D. Jablonski Toussaint L. Myricks All slides Copyright © 2007.
Intellectual Property in Peer-to-Peer Networks Artsiom Yautsiukhin Natallia Kokash Intellectual Property Law, 18 October 2005.
What is Copyright? Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection granted under Indian law to the creators of original works of authorship such.
Class 16 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Third-Party Liability Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent Richard Warner.
D IRECT I NFRINGEMENT Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line 907 F. Supp (N.D. Cal. 1995)
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving. IP address do not map to a single person – hard to trace user Music and movie industry.
The Post MGM v. Grokster World New Rules for P2P P2P MEDIA SUMMIT NY.
The Start Shawn Fanning (19-yr-old student nicknamed Napster) developed the original Napster application and service in January 1999 while a freshman.
p2p challenges law (and vice versa) Charles Nesson October 2, 2004.
Copyright and the Law For more information contact:
Digital Copyright II Intro to IP – Prof. Merges [Originally scheduled for ]
Copyright Law Ronald W. Staudt Class 26 November 26, 2013.
The Physical/Virtual Divide Rebecca Giblin Monash University Australia.
A company called Napster was developed. This company encouraged piracy by enabling and allowing its users to trade copyrighted songs through its servers.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
 To teach our students  To model for our students  To avoid unwittingly breaking the law  To avoid possible infringement entanglements  Why do you.
Compsci 82, Fall Peer to Peer l What is peer to peer?  Useful? Disruptive?  Manageable, governable?  Architecture l Napster, Gnutella, Limeware,
Copyright Infringement Present by: Shao-Chuan Fang Jaime McDermott Emily Nagin Michael Piston Fan Yang Carnegie Mellon Group Presentation Date:
Compsci 82, Fall Peer to Peer l What is peer to peer?  Useful? Disruptive?  Manageable, governable?  Architecture l Napster, Gnutella, Limeware,
Cyber Law Title: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC COPYING Group Members Amirul Bin Jamil Engku Nadzry Bin Engku Rahmat Mohd Danial Shah Bin Shahzali.
Cyber Law Title: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC COPYING Group Members Amirul Bin Jamil Engku Nadzry Bin Engku Rahmat Mohd Danial Shah Bin Shahzali.
Internet Economics What does the internet facilitate?
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving.
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Class 19 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Third-Party Liability
Class 18 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Third-Party Liability
CS 115: COMPUTING FOR The Socio-Techno Web
Copyright VI: Copyright & Internet Services
Cooper & Dunham LLP Established 1887
Who owns the Bits? Digital copyright issues are continually evolving.
Presentation transcript:

File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent Richard Warner

Sony v. Betamax Recording complete TV shows for the personal purpose of time-shifting does not infringe copyright. It is fair use. Providing a recording device that can be used to infringe copyright is not contributory copyright infringement “if the product is widely used for legitimate, unobjectionable purposes. Indeed, it need merely be capable of substantial noninfringing uses.”

Contributory Infringement/Vicarious Liability Vicarious liability: the right and ability to control users; and a direct financial benefit from the wrongful activity. Contributory infringement: knowledge of the infringing activity, and a material contribution (actual assistance or inducement).

How Napster Works

The Central Server The Napster central servers had a complete list of every shared song available on every hard disk connected to Napster at that time. Copyright law allows friends to share music with friends. The legal theory behind Napster: "All of the people on Napster are sharing songs with friends."

Napster Is Illegal Napster users violate copyright when they download copyrighted works without permission. Napster also incurs legal liability. Vicarious liability: the right and ability to control users; and a direct financial benefit from the wrongful activity. Contributory infringement: knowledge of the infringing activity, and a material contribution (actual assistance or inducement).

How Grokster Works

No Central Server No central database indexes all of the files on the Gnutella network. The machines tell each other about available files.

Is Grokster Illegal? Vicarious liability: the right and ability to control users; and a direct financial benefit from the wrongful activity. Grokster lacks the right and ability to control. Contributory infringement: knowledge of the infringing activity, and a material contribution (actual assistance or inducement). Grokster has no specific knowledge of infringing activity.

Inducement “We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.” MGM Studios v. Grokster

Does It Violate Copyright Law Merely Maintain A Gnutella Network? Vicarious liability: the right and ability to control users; and a direct financial benefit from the wrongful activity. No right and ability Contributory infringement: knowledge of the infringing activity, and a material contribution (actual assistance or inducement). No knowledge Inducement: distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement. No company or organization.

BitTorrent Index server

Operators of Bit Torrent Index Servers Operators can be liable for copyright violation under an inducement theory.