Key steps of the evaluation process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Advertisements

Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
EVALUATION Prof.Dr.Şakire Pöğün Ege Ün. Tıp Fakültesi (expert evaluator) Intra-European (IEF) International Outgoing (OIF) Fellowships International Incoming(IIF)
Horizon 2020 Energy Efficiency Information Day 12 December 2014 Essentials on how to submit a good proposal EASME Project Advisors: Francesca Harris,
1 Use and content of the RFP  Request for Proposals (RFP) is similar to bidding documents and include all information of the assignment, selection of.
The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 Judit Fejes Executive Agency of Small and Medium Enterprises (EASME)
Capitalising the full potential of online-collaboration for SME innovation support Horizon 2020 call Innosup (Participant Portal code: H2020-INNOSUP )
Thierry Boulangé Programme Coordination Unit DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology H2020 Information Day Belgrade, 11 February 2015.
How to submit a good proposal Ms Anette Jahn Mr Gordon Sutherland Mr Gianluca Tondi.
Provisional draft The ICT Theme in FP7 Submission and Evaluation (preliminary information) ICT-NCP Information Day 19 th October 2006.
Horizontal Research Activities involving SMEs Joachim Ball, European Commission, DG RTD B3 n Co-operative Research n Collective Research General Introduction.
2014 CEF Transport Calls National Info Day – Czech Republic Michal Ziliak Innovation and Networks Executive Agency Prague, 28 November 2014.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
Eng Introduction to the application form 17/10/2014 Marie von Malmborg Karin Tjulin Tytti Voutilainen.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Application procedure: how to make a proposal Belgrade, 28 February 2013 Annalisa Bogliolo EC, DG CNECT : “Programme Coordination” unit CIP - ICT Policy.
Proposal evaluation process in FP7 Moldova – Research Horizon 29 January 2013 Kristin Kraav.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
Technology Programme Autumn 2005 Autumn 2005 Competition The Application and Assessment Process Peter Miles TUVNEL Ltd.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
The Assessment of COST Actions PHOENIX Workshop in Kyrgyzstan, May 2007 “Road to excellence: Research evaluation in SSH“
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
IST programme 1 IST KA3: The Evaluation Introduction & Contents Principles Outline procedures Criteria and Assessment What this means for proposers.
Regions of Knowledge WP and calls for proposals 2008 Warszawa, European Commission DG RTD/B4 Anna Rémond.
[Title of the presentation]. Content 1.Main principles of H Type of actions in Energy Efficiency Call 3.Evaluation 4.Deadlines and budget 5.Where.
HORIZON 2020 European Commission Research and Innovation First stakeholder workshop on Horizon 2020 Implementation Brussels, 16 January 2015.
Dr. Marion Tobler, NCP Environment Evaluation Criteria and Procedure.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
SELECTION PROCEDURE Clivio CASALI, Project Officer EM ECW Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Call for Proposals for mobility activities starting in.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
Danish Agricultural Advisory Service National Centre Possibilities and limits in a Specific Support Action By Erik Fog and Michael Tersbøl, DAAS European.
Overview of the IST Priority Information Package National Contact Points 23rd Oct 2002 Tom McKinlay: IST Operations.
ICT PSP Call 5 How to make a proposal ICT PSP Call 5 Information day Brussels: 28 th February 2011 Tom McKinlay DG INFSO ICT Operations Unit.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Science, research and development European Commission Søren Bøwadt, M&T,I Workshop on Virtual Institutes 28th of Sept.
Evaluation Process 2014 Geoff Callow Director-Technology Turquoise International Ltd IMPART: July 2015.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
1 Call for Proposals & Eligibility Call for Proposals & Eligibility Guide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria Guide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria.
Regional Policy The Seal of Excellence A concrete example of operational synergies between Horizon 2020 and the ESIF Magda De Carli Deputy Head of Unit.
DG RTD as a policy DG: what changes? 'IGLO Open' 6 October 2015 Ms Maive Rute, Director, DG RTD.R.
Evaluation of proposals Alan Cross European Commission.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
LIFE+ Project evaluation and selection Markéta Konečná 9 April 2013.
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
HORIZON 2020 PROPOSAL EVALUATION A NEW TYPE OF EU R&I PROGRAMME.
The Assessment Process 11/07/2016. Types of calls and proposals Calls are challenge-based, and therefore more open to innovative proposals − Calls are.
Participation in Horizon 2020
Deputy Business Process Owner 'H2020 Grant Management'
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
Innovative Training Networks
ARTEMIS Brokerage Event Barcelona, December 14th 2010
The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7
What is a grant? A direct financial contribution – donation – from EU budget An action - contributing to EU policy achievement Functioning of a body acting.
Individual Fellowships
INEA Innovation and Networks Executive Agency
Infravation Consensus Meeting Sept 2014
Research and Innovation Staff Exchange
Pentalateral Energy Forum & European Commission Meeting
Kara Baptista – Evaluation Manager, CEF Telecom - INEA
Preparatory Action 2011 European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps Call for proposal
Evaluation processes Horizon 2020 Info Days November 2017
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
What Evaluators Want Smart Cities & Communities Info Day Horizon 2020
The evaluation process
Proposal submission, evaluation, selection and award procedures
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
H2020 SCC Smart Cities & Communities Info Day Horizon 2020
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Some valuable tips about how to go about constructing a project
Presentation transcript:

Key steps of the evaluation process Horizon 2020 Smart Cities & Communities Info Day #H2020SCC1 Krastio Preslavsky Deputy Head of Unit Support, Coordination & Communication INEA

INEA in short Turning policy into action: > Turning policy into action: Organising calls for proposals Monitoring the technical and financial implementation of projects Supervised by 4 Commission DGs: ENER, MOVE, RTD, CNECT Delegated programmes: Horizon 2020 Energy and Transport, Connecting Europe Facility and 2007-2013 legacy programmes Managing €34 billion in 2014-2020; 2100+ projects expected by 2020

Submission of proposals Submission via the Research & Innovation Participant Portal (electronic submission only) Unregistered user: Search for funding opportunities, read manuals and legal documents, check FAQs etc. Registered user: Submit proposals, sign grant agreements, manage lifecycle etc. Very important: Start preparing the proposal as early as possible and submit on time

Submission of proposals Budget Opening Deadline SCC-1-2016-2017 (IA) Smart Cities and Communities lighthouse projects €69.5 million 4 October 2016 14 February 2017

Login or register Calls and Submission Service (Available without login)

Key steps of the evaluation Admissibility and eligibility checks All forms submitted? Call conditions met? Evaluation by external experts (minimum 3; up to 7 for complex proposals, such as SCC) Proposals evaluated as submitted Lower score if shortcomings are identified Only admissible and eligible proposals are evaluated

External experts Selected from a database of experts - over 80 000 evaluators Main requirements: High-level of expertise in the relevant fields of R&I Independence (evaluating in a personal capacity), Impartiality (no conflict of interest), objectivity Balanced composition of groups: Professional experience (e.g. academia, business), gender and geographical balance Regular rotation and involvement of new experts

What do we ask them to do? Understand Call Text Evaluate individually Read briefing material Follow remote briefings Evaluate individually A number of proposals Provide assessment against evaluation criteria Come to a Consensus Discuss with other experts Reach consensus on comments and scores Calibrate with other evaluators.

Against what do we ask them to evaluate? Credibility of the approach, soundness of concept, clarity and pertinence of the objectives, extent of ambition, innovation potential Excellence As explained in Work Programme, exploitation communication and dissemination plan Impact Coherence, effectiveness, complementarity in the consortium, risk and innovation management, appropriateness of management structures and procedures Quality & Efficiency of Implementation

Outcome Ranked lists of proposals: based on scores of experts Possible outcomes for applicants: Main list proposal = top scores > start grant agreement preparation Reserve list proposal = score above thresholds > if additional funding available in future will get invitation to start grant agreement preparation Rejection = below threshold or above threshold but no available funding One or more observers (external experts) monitor the evaluations to verify compliance with procedures Time to inform applicants: max 5 months

Grant agreement preparation After the evaluation, successful proposals get an invitation letter to start the Grant Agreement preparation Very tight timeline: time to grant of max 8 months (after call deadline) New in H2020: no negotiation The proposal has been evaluated according to its merits No substantial changes during the grant agreement preparation

Conclusions Evaluation: a transparent, fair, and efficient process Large demand and strong competition Pencil the opening and deadline dates in your calendars Start preparing your proposal as early as possible Check FAQs on the Participant portal Don’t wait until the deadline to submit your proposals And if you aren't submitting proposals, we always need new external evaluators – enrol via the Participant Portal Good luck!

For more information inea@ec.europa.eu http://ec.europa.eu/inea @inea_eu Look for INEA!