Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Advertisements

BC System – Review Options ● BC2 working point (energy-charge-compr.) ● 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) ● table: 2BC (rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf) dogleg + 2BC (rf-dog-rf-rf-bc-rf-bc-rf)
1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Reduced Gun Simulations 1. Comparison 60MV/m Gun vs 50MV/m Gun, Flat Top Laser Pulse 2. Comparison for the worst case: Gun50+Gauss Laser Pulse 3. Summary.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections.
Simulation of Microbunching Instability in LCLS with Laser-Heater Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
X-band Based FEL proposal
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Cutting Beam Horns in BC1
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Paul Scherrer Institut
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
XFEL Beam Physics 10/30/2015 Tor Raubenheimer.
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
XFEL Bunch Compression System Tuning
Injector Beam Line Optics
Electron Source Configuration
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Simulation Calculations
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
Current State of the Lattice Studies for the XFEL Injector
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System: Introduction and Concept Torsten Limberg.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
S2E Meeting on Yauhen Kot.
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update. Yauhen Kot XFEL Bema Dynamics Meeting 25.02.2008

Outline Overview about the main components and space margins Optics at the laser heater and diagnostics FODO + parabola-like b at the heater FODO + const b Drift with parabola-like b Phase advance between the OTRs in the drift solution Beam sizes at the OTRs Estimations of the laser heater specifications Formulas Assumptions and requirements Maximum energy modulation Laser peak power for different configurations Energy distribution after the interaction with the laser heater Summary

Injector Building Plan Injector is divided by reinforced concrete wall (Shielding) in two unequal parts: left one is used for injection tuning in the right one the beam is matched by means of Dogleg into the Linac Total length: 73,80m Total beam line length: 64,50m Length from left wall to dump: 42,28m

Point of Interest: from Gun to Dump Boundary conditions: The wall on the left Dump dipole on the right. All diagnostics have to be be placed there. Beamline length from Gun to Dump: 32,40m 9.30m spare place from the wall to gun foreseen now Gun Module LH 1.50m 9.30m F O D O

Laser Heater Integration: FODO + Parabola-like b at the Heater Gun Module LH Diagnostics Shielding Matching to Shielding F O D O Matching to DOG Matching to FODO 11.20 6.71 6.50 1.95 8.75 0.00 3.54 14.75 22.16 24.55 31.02 32.96 42.29 44.96 - LH requires 6.71m possible for a very wide range of the initial b-function no influence on the phase advance between OTR monitors from the optics in the laser heater. b-function is not constant along the LH almost no spare place left for further improvements

Laser Heater Integration: FODO + const b at the Heater Gun Module LH Diagnostics Shielding Matching to Shielding F O D O Matching to DOG Matching to FODO 11.20 6.71 6.50 1.95 8.75 0.00 3.54 14.75 22.16 24.55 31.02 32.96 42.29 44.96 - LH requires 6.71m possible for a very wide range of the initial b-function no influence on the phase advance between OTR monitors from the optics in the laser heater. b-function is constant along the LH the best conditions for operating the laser heater. places with extremely flat beam unavoidable. - no spare place left for further improvements

Laser Heater Integration: Drift with Parabola-like b Gun Module LH Diagnostics Shielding Spare place Matching to DOG 11.20 7.36 2.68 7.47 8.75 0.00 3.54 15.45 22.81 25.49 32.96 42.29 44.96 - LH requires 7.36m desired phase advance of 45° between OTRs for initial b-function between 30m and 65m achievable additional 7.47m of spare place. - only OTR monitors are to be installed in the diagnostics section. no other stuff required. b-function is not constant along the heater

Phase Advances between OTRs in the Drift Solution Phase advances between OTR monitors for different intial values of b-function initial beta min beta phase advances 20 1.267 42.5 - 29.2 - 42.5 24 1.008 44.6 - 36.0 - 44.6 26 0.920 44.6 - 39.6 - 44.6 28 0.840 45.0 - 42.8 - 45.0 30 0.800 45.0 - 45.0 - 45.0 65 70 0.780 45.4 - 45.7 - 45.4 75 0.728 45.0 - 48.6 - 45.0 Desired phase advance of 45° is achievable in the range of the initial b-function between 30m and 65m Expected initial b-function: 20-70m  regions 20-30m and 65-70m could be critical.

Expected beam sizes at the OTR monitors OTRs in the FODO solution OTRs 1&4 in the drift solution OTRs 2&3 in the drift solution Assumed emittance, mm mrad b, m Beam size range, mm 1.0-1.5 2.435 98.9 - 121.2 5.50 148.7 - 182.1 0.935 61.3 - 75.1 FODO solution provides the constant b-function at the OTR monitors, leading to the same beam size Drift solution: different betas at exterior and interior OTRs  different beam sizes The smallest expected beam size at the OTR is about 61mm, still comfortable above the tolerance limit of the OTR monitor (10mm).

Distribution function after the interaction with the laser heater Main Formulas for the Estimation of the Laser Heater Specifications Distribution function after the interaction with the laser heater Laser peak power sx – transverse beam size sr – laser beam size rms DgL – energy modulation sg0 – initial energy spread

Assumptions and Requirements for the Estimations Energy spread considerations: - Desired uncorrelated energy spread after the acceleration: 2.5MeV rms. - BC1 and BC2 with the compression of 20x5=100 Uncorrelated energy spread after the laser heater should be below 25keV Laser Heater should provide the uncorrelated energy spread of the beam up to 25keV. Beam size at the laser heater: - Normalized beam emittance range: 1.0-1.5mm mrad - Depends on the solution for the diagnostics section after the heater. FODO solution: b-function is constant along the laser heater and assumes the value of 10m.  beam size rms: 200-246 mm Drift solution: b-function varies from 12 to 8m along the laser heater. beam size rms: from 180-220 mm to 220-270 mm Average beam size at the heater for the drift solution:  Linear with s  varies from 200 to 245mm

Rms Heater-Induced Local Energy Spread Max energy modulation, keV 15 35 45 55 65 75 25 Rms heater-induced local energy spread, keV 60 50 40 30 20 10 sx sr [mm] Expected range for the maximum energy modulation sx=sr sr – laser rms sx – transverse beam rms sr=(sx)max sx=(sx)min sr=(sx)min sx=(sx)max Rms heater-induced energy spread depends crucial on the ratio sx/sr Transverse beam size varies by about 20% along the laser heater. If the energy spread of 25keV desired, the maximum energy modulation is expected to be in the range of 53.56 - 70.31keV. For sx=sr the energy modulation of 60.86keV needed

Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum Energy Modulation: 60.86keV e=1.0 10-6m e=1.5 10-6m laser spot rms sr, mm laser peak power, MW 4.0 160 180 200 220 240 320 300 280 260 340 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.5 2.0 3.5 3.0 Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field 0.33T) l, nm lu K peak power for sr=200mm (e=1.0mm mrad) sr=245mm (e=1.5mm mrad) 527 0.0383 1.18 0.99 1.48 800 0.0476 1.47 0.66 1054 0.0543 1.67 0.52 0.78

Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum energy modulation: 53.56keV 160 260 280 300 320 340 180 200 220 240 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 4.0 3.5 Laser spot rms sr, mm Laser peak power, MW e=1.0 10-6m e=1.5 10-6m Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field 0.33T) l, nm lu K peak power for sr=245mm (e=1.0mm mrad) sr=300mm (e=1.5mm mrad) 527 0.0383 1.18 1.15 1.72 800 0.0476 1.47 0.77 1054 0.0543 1.67 0.61 0.91

Uncorrelated Energy Spread after the Interaction with the Laser Beam Maximum energy modulation: 70.31keV 160 300 320 340 180 200 220 260 240 280 Laser spot rms sr, mm 4.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 3.5 3.0 Laser peak power, MW e=1.5 10-6m e=1.0 10-6m Laser peak power for different wave lengths, MW (undulator field 0.33T) l, nm lu K peak power for sr=164mm (e=1.0mm mrad) sr=200mm (e=1.5mm mrad) 527 0.0383 1.18 0.88 1.32 800 0.0476 1.47 0.59 1054 0.0543 1.67 0.47 0.70

Energy Distribution after the Interaction with the Laser Beam sx sr [mm] 0.04 All distributions have the same energy spread, but different form 0.03 V[keV-1] 0.02 sr – laser rms sx – transverse beam rms 0.01 -80 -60 -40 -20 20 40 60 80 Energy deviation, keV The ratio sx/sr has impact on the final form of the energy distribution: Case one: sr <sx  sharp spike with long tails Case two: sr=sx  more or less gaussian distribution Case three: sr>sx  approx. like a water bug Case four: sr>>sx  double horn structure. Perfectly matched laser beam size or slightly above the electron beam rms provides the most convenient form of the energy distribution.

Summary Three different optics have been calculated for the implementation of the laser heater and the diagnostics. Optics with the drift solution for the diagnostics allows to save about 7m space. Constant phase advance between OTRs can be provided, however, only for a range of initial b 30-65m. Optics with the FODO solution for the diagnostics requires more place, but makes the phase advances beteewn OTRs independent from the intial b. Beam sizes at the OTRs are well above the tolerance limits of the monitors. Laser heater specifications have been calculated for the laser wave lengths of 527, 800 and 1054 nm. Uncorrelated energy spread of the bunch after the interaction with the laser heater has been calculated for different ratios sr/sx. Perfectly matched laser beam size or laser beam slightly larger than the electron beam provides the most preferable energy distribution.

sx sr sx=sr [mm] Expected range for the maximum energy modulation maximum energy modulation, keV 15 35 45 55 65 75 25 rms heater-induced local energy spread, keV 60 50 40 30 20 10 sx sr [mm] sx=sr Expected range for the maximum energy modulation