Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Advertisements

GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1288r1 Submission November 2010 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Frame Format for GroupID Management Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission Jul 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/0842r0 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Short Beamforming Report Poll Frame Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2010 Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0633r0 Submission Richard van Nee, Qualcomm May 14, 2009 Slide 1 Strawmodel ac Specification Framework Authors: Date:
VHT Capabilities and Operation elements and VHTC field
Inefficiency of 256-FFT per 20MHz
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
AID Selection Date: Authors: September 2010 Month Year
Preamble Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Thoughts on Doppler Design in ax
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
VHTSIG Considerations
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
Reducing Channel Dimension in MU-MIMO CSI Feedback
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
Cyclic Shift For More Than 4 Antennas in Non-VHT Portion
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Physical Layer Encoding for Interoperable NGV New Modulations
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
VHT Packet Length Calculation
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
PHY Power Saving Features For 11ac
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
VHT Capabilities and Operation elements and VHTC field
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Jan. 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0130r0 July 2010 Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Date: 2010-07-12 Authors: Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech. Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.

Problem Definition MU-MIMO transmission using spatial streams July 2010 Problem Definition MU-MIMO transmission using spatial streams Need to communicate stream assignment in VHT-SIG-A Bit allocation has to be compact Minimize/Eliminate management frames overhead in defining any parameters required Fast adaptation to changes in channel conditions or user bandwidth requirements Per-packet assignment flexibility Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

Partitions of Number of streams July 2010 Partitions of Number of streams NSTS or NSS Distribution of streams across multiple STAs Num cases 1 (1) 2 (2)(1,1) 3 (3)(2,1)(1,1,1) 4 (4)(3,1)(2,2)(2,1,1)(1,1,1,1) 5 (5)(4,1)(3,2)(3,1,1)(2,2,1)(2,1,1,1)(1,1,1,1,1) 6 (6)(5,1)(4,2)(4,1,1)(3,3)(3,2,1)(3,1,1,1)(2,2,2)(2,2,1,1)(2,1,1,1,1)(1,1,1,1,1,1) 8 7 (7)(6,1)(5,2)(5,1,1)(4,3)(4,2,1)(4,1,1,1)(3,3,1)(3,2,2)(3,2,1,1)(3,1,1,1,1) (2,2,2,1)(2,2,1,1,1)(2,1,1,1,1,1)(1,1,1,1,1,1,1) (8)(7,1)(6,2)(6,1,1)(5,3)(5,2,1)(5,1,1,1)(4,4)(4,3,1)(4,2,2)(4,2,1,1)(4,1,1,1,1) (3,3,2)(3,3,1,1)(3,2,2,1)(3,2,1,1,1)(3,1,1,1,1,1)(2,2,2,2)(2,2,2,1,1) (2,2,1,1,1,1)(2,1,1,1,1,1,1)(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) 9 With not more than 4 streams per STA in multi-user case and not more than 4 STAs in a group 42 cases  6 bit “Partition Index” field With NSTA known, we need 4 bits (1-STA: 8, 2-STA: 10, 3-STA: 13, 4-STA: 11 cases) Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

Partitions of NSTS (or NSS) for fixed NSTA July 2010 Partitions of NSTS (or NSS) for fixed NSTA NSTA Distribution of streams across multiple STAs Num cases 1 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) 8 2 (1,1)(2,1)(3,1)(2,2)(4,1)(3,2)(4,2)(3,3)(4,3)(4,4) 10 3 (1,1,1)(2,1,1)(3,1,1)(2,2,1)(4,1,1)(3,2,1)(2,2,2)(4,2,1)(3,3,1)(3,2,2)(4,3,1)(4,2,2) (3,3,2) 13 4 (1,1,1,1)(2,1,1,1)(3,1,1,1)(2,2,1,1)(4,1,1,1)(3,2,1,1)(2,2,2,1)(4,2,1,1)(3,3,1,1) (3,2,2,1)(2,2,2,2) 11 With not more than 4 streams per STA in multi-user case and not more than 4 STAs in a group With NSTA known, we need 4 bits (1-STA: 8, 2-STA: 10, 3-STA: 13, 4-STA: 11 cases) Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

STA_PHY_ID Need STA PHY identifiers to go with partition index July 2010 STA_PHY_ID Need STA PHY identifiers to go with partition index 5 bit STA_PHY_ID assigned by AP 0 is not assigned, assumed invalid – useful in providing NSTA count Supports 31 STAs which are capable of decoding multi-user packets Reassign IDs if necessary May use AID by allocating 1-31 for STA with multi-user receive capability 8 bits possible if we extend VHT-SIGA to 3 OFDM symbols Support 255 multi-user receive capable STAs Reduces reuse associated overhead Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

VHT-SIG-A : option 1 – Multi-user case July 2010 VHT-SIG-A : option 1 – Multi-user case Field Number of bits Explanation and coding Multi-user packet 1 : set to 1 0: Single user packet, 1: Multi-user packet STA_PHY_IDs 5x4 Indicate which STAs are assigned the streams in the correct order Partition Index – NSTS 4 Indicate number of space-time streams and the assignment of streams to each of the STAs listed in STA_PHY_IDs NSTA is derived by counting valid STA_PHY_IDs Partition Index – NSS Indicate number of spatial streams and a valid partition to identify which streams are STBC encoded (needs to be valid for a given partition of NSTS: NSS,k ≤ NSTS,k) Alternatively, we can allocate 1 bit for each STA, but it limits STBC to just two options CBW 2 Channel bandwidth 00-11 -> 20/40/80/160 MHz 3 TBD CRC 8 Tail bits 6 Total up to 48 bits -> 2 OFDM symbols at 6Mbps When Multi-user bit set to 0, we can merge VHT-SIG-B into VHT-SIG-A and eliminate VHT-SIG-B With 3 OFDM symbols we can accommodate 8 bit STA_PHY_IDs which can reduce overhead in reassigning STA_PHY_IDs Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

VHT-SIG-A : option 1 – Single-user case July 2010 VHT-SIG-A : option 1 – Single-user case Field Number of bits Explanation and coding Multi-user packet 1 : set to 0 0: Single user packet, 1: Multi-user packet MCS x Length 16 NSTS 3 STBC CBW 2 Channel bandwidth 00-11 -> 20/40/80/160 MHz TBD CRC 8 Tail bits 6 VHT-SIG-B not required in this case Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

VHT-SIG-A : option 2 July 2010 Field Number of bits Explanation and coding GroupID 6 Indicate which STAs are assigned the streams (GroupID defines a set containing up to 4 STA IDs, not necessarily ordered) Permutation Index 5 24 permutations possible with 4 STAs Partition Index for NSTS 4 Indicate number of space-time streams and the assignment of streams to the STAs defined by GroupID Partition Index for NSS Indicate number of spatial streams and a partition to identify which streams are STBC encoded (needs to be valid for a given partition of NSTS: NSS,k ≤ NSTS,k ) CBW 2 Channel bandwidth 00-11 -> 20/40/80/160 MHz TBD CRC 8 Tail bits High Management Frame overhead in communicating GroupID to all STAs Ordering of STAs may be included in GroupID definition but will need more than 6bits Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

VHT-SIG-Bn, n=1,2,…,NSTA July 2010 Field Number of bits Explanation and coding MCS 4 Length 16 Aggregation 1 FEC Coding x TBD CRC 8 Tail bits 6 Total up to 48 bits  2 OFDM symbols at 6Mbps SIG-Bs for different STAs transmitted in parallel Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

Example 1 NSTA = 2 with 4 RX antennas each 8 TX antennas July 2010 Example 1 NSTA = 2 with 4 RX antennas each 8 TX antennas AP decides to transmit 4 streams, 2 each to the two STAs No STBC Partition Index NSTS = 3  (2,2) Partition Index NSS = 3  (2,2) VHT-SIG-A [0:28] = [ 1 10000 01000 00000 00000 1100 1100 ] L-STF-LTF-SIG 20μs VHT-SIG-A 8μs VHT-STF 4μs VHT-LTF1 4μs VHT-LTF2 4μs VHT-LTF3 4μs VHT-LTF4 4μs VHT-SIG-B1 8μs DATA DATA VHT-SIG-B2 8μs DATA DATA Expanded to NTX streams as in 11n 4 LTFs for 4 streams NSTA ≤ NSS ≤ NSTS ≤ NTX Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

Example 2 NSTA = 2 with 4 RX antennas each 8 TX antennas July 2010 Example 2 NSTA = 2 with 4 RX antennas each 8 TX antennas AP decides to transmit 4 streams, 2 each to the two STAs STBC for both STAs Partition Index NSTS = 3  (2,2) Partition Index NSS = 0  (1,1) VHT-SIG-A [0:28] = [ 1 10000 01000 00000 00000 1100 0000 ] L-STF-LTF-SIG 20μs VHT-SIG-A 8μs VHT-STF 4μs VHT-LTF1 4μs VHT-LTF2 4μs VHT-LTF3 4μs VHT-LTF4 4μs VHT-SIG-B1 8μs DATA VHT-SIG-B2 8μs DATA Expanded to NTX streams as in 11n 4 LTFs for 4 streams NSTA ≤ NSS ≤ NSTS ≤ NTX Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

Discussion Advantages July 2010 Discussion Advantages Per packet stream distribution possible resulting in fast adaptation to channel variations Parallel Per-STA length and MCS signaling in VHT-SIG-Bs reduces some overhead Per packet station selection possible with STA_PHY_IDs included in VHT-SIG-A Reduces management frame overhead in assigning GroupID Power saving by switching off receiver if STA_PHY_ID doesn’t match Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.

References IEEE Std 802.11n-2009 09/0992r10, TGac Spec framework July 2010 References IEEE Std 802.11n-2009 09/0992r10, TGac Spec framework 10/0073r1, GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.