Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 303-311 (March 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007 Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 The percentage of respondents in each stakeholder group who ranked each type of biographical information in the top three most important. Responses are ordered according to frequency of responses by donor-conceived offspring. Values for donors are the average of sperm and oocyte donors; values for recipients represent the average of sperm and oocyte recipients. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2011 22, 303-311DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions