Creating Single-Copy Genetic Circuits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goal Show the modeling process used by both Collins (toggle switch) and Elowitz (repressilator) to inform design of biological network necessary to encode.
Advertisements

Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli Farah and Tom.
GENETIC TOGGLE SWITCH IN E. COLI COLLINS LAB (2000) Allen Lin 1.
Targeted Disruption of V600E-Mutant BRAF Gene by CRISPR-Cpf1
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Wei-Hsiang Lin, Edo Kussell  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e12 (July 2017)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Tineke L. Lenstra, Antoine Coulon, Carson C. Chow, Daniel R. Larson 
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Design of Adjacent Transcriptional Regions to Tune Gene Expression and Facilitate Circuit Construction  Fuqing Wu, Qi Zhang, Xiao Wang  Cell Systems 
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Kinetics of Genetic Switching into the State of Bacterial Competence
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Tineke L. Lenstra, Antoine Coulon, Carson C. Chow, Daniel R. Larson 
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Cell-Type-Specific Control of Enhancer Activity by H3K9 Trimethylation
Hijacking the DNA Damage Response to Enhance Viral Replication: γ-Herpesvirus 68 orf36 Phosphorylates Histone H2AX  Anyong Xie, Ralph Scully  Molecular.
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Phenotypic Consequences of Promoter-Mediated Transcriptional Noise
Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module
Slow Chromatin Dynamics Allow Polycomb Target Genes to Filter Fluctuations in Transcription Factor Activity  Scott Berry, Caroline Dean, Martin Howard 
Gene Regulation: Hacking the Network on a Sugar High
Design of Adjacent Transcriptional Regions to Tune Gene Expression and Facilitate Circuit Construction  Fuqing Wu, Qi Zhang, Xiao Wang  Cell Systems 
Domitilla Del Vecchio, Hussein Abdallah, Yili Qian, James J. Collins 
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Genjiro Suzuki, Jonathan S. Weissman, Motomasa Tanaka  Molecular Cell 
An RNA Aptamer that Induces Transcription
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Metabolic Control of Persister Formation in Escherichia coli
Mode of Regulation and the Insulation of Bacterial Gene Expression
Eugenia Y. Xu, Karl A. Zawadzki, James R. Broach  Molecular Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Quiet Gene Circuit More Fragile Than Its Noisy Peer
Tradeoffs and Optimality in the Evolution of Gene Regulation
A Tunable Genetic Switch Based on RNAi and Repressor Proteins for Regulating Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells  Tara L. Deans, Charles R. Cantor, James.
Dale Muzzey, Alexander van Oudenaarden  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Rational Design of Evolutionarily Stable Microbial Kill Switches
Isocost Lines Describe the Cellular Economy of Genetic Circuits
A Tunable Genetic Switch Based on RNAi and Repressor Proteins for Regulating Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells  Tara L. Deans, Charles R. Cantor, James.
Andrew E. Blanchard, Chen Liao, Ting Lu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Making Cellular Memories
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Central Dogma Theory and Kinetic Models
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Rational Design of Evolutionarily Stable Microbial Kill Switches
Protein Dimerization Generates Bistability in Positive Feedback Loops
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Ian B. Dodd, Mille A. Micheelsen, Kim Sneppen, Geneviève Thon  Cell 
Cellular Heterogeneity in the Mouse Esophagus Implicates the Presence of a Nonquiescent Epithelial Stem Cell Population  Aaron D. DeWard, Julie Cramer,
Switches, Switches, Every Where, In Any Drop We Drink
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers  Julia B. Carleton, Kristofer.
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast
Presentation transcript:

Creating Single-Copy Genetic Circuits Jeong Wook Lee, Andras Gyorgy, D. Ewen Cameron, Nora Pyenson, Kyeong Rok Choi, Jeffrey C. Way, Pamela A. Silver, Domitilla Del Vecchio, James J. Collins  Molecular Cell  Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 329-336 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 63, 329-336DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Initial Conversion of the Multi-Copy Toggle Switch to Single-Copy (A) Schematic illustration of the toggle switch. Reciprocal transcriptional repressions by LacI and TetR form coupled feedback loops that enable bistability. (B) FACS histograms of E. coli with no plasmid (null), the single-copy toggle switch (SC), the single-copy toggle switch with enhanced GFP and mCherry expression (SC enhanced), and the multi-copy toggle switch (MC). Cells were induced with ATc (green state, left) or IPTG (red state, right). (C) Time course of toggle stability. The multi-copy toggle (MC) and single-copy toggle (SC enhanced) were pushed into the green or red states with ATc or IPTG, respectively, and the percentage of cells that remained in that state was measured by FACS at each time point. The multi-copy toggle is bistable, while the single-copy toggle is only stable in the red state. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. (D) Nullcline analysis of the mathematical model reveals that the toggle switch should be bistable if ε<ε∗ where ε∗ is given in Supplemental Procedures 3. The heatmap represents this critical value ε∗, so that a toggle with ε values below the threshold is bistable with given parameters of μ and k. (E and F) Reduction of the plasmid copy number from n=50 (E) to n=1 (F) lowers μ, reshaping the region of bistability (shaded region). Notably, the regions of bistability in (E) and (F) are slices from the heatmap that correspond to two different μ values in (D). At the indicated parameter combination (dot), the toggle switch is predicted to lose bistability when transferred to a single-copy plasmid. See also Figure S1 and Table S3. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 329-336DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rebalanced Regulator Expression in the Single-Copy Toggle (A) Increased TetR was achieved by RBS modification using rational design (T1, T2, and T4) and random mutagenesis (T3). TM shows TetR expression in the original multi-copy plasmid, and TS shows its expression when moved to the single-copy plasmid. (B) Increased LacI expression was achieved by stepwise modification of its RBS (L1 and L3), promoter (L2), and 5′ untranslated region (L4–L6). LM and LS indicate the unmodified TetR expression in the multi-copy and single-copy plasmids, respectively. (C) TetR and LacI expression variants from (A) and (B) were paired and tested for bistability in the single-copy toggle. Toggle stability was measured 24 hr after removal of IPTG or ATc for the red or green state, respectively. The box indicates the variant that most closely recapitulated the multi-copy expression level (L5-T3). (D) Enhanced LacI expression in the L5-TS toggle changed its stability to monostable in the green state. LS-TS indicates the unmodified single-copy toggle. (E) LacI and TetR expression levels that recapitulate their multi-copy expression (L5-T3) do not provide bistability to the single-copy toggle. The circuit is monostable in the red state. LM-TM indicates the unmodified multi-copy toggle. Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. See also Figure S2 and Tables S1 and S3. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 329-336DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Tightened Transcriptional Repression Provides Bistability to the Single-Copy Toggle (A) The O1 LacI operator in PTrc2 was replaced with the Oid operator to create the PT1 promoter. Additional Oid operators were included to create PT2, PT3, and PT4. Open circles indicate the −35 and −10 elements. (B) RT-qPCR was used to measure tetR transcription from PTrc2 and PT1-PT4 in the L6-T4 single-copy plasmid. The promoters were tested in the presence of ATc and 4 hr after its removal. (C) Promoters PT2, PT3 and PT4 were cloned into the L6-T4 single-copy toggle and tested for bistability over 72 hr. (D) A range of LacI and TetR expression variants were tested for bistability in the single-copy toggle containing PT3. A wide-range of expression variants showed bistability (compare to Figure 2C). (E) Genomic integration of the L6-PT3T4 toggle switch improved its stability compared to the single-copy plasmid. The flow cytometry distribution of GFP and mCherry at 72 hr is shown on the right. (F) Growth analysis of cells containing the genomically integrated L6-PT3T4 toggle. Cells containing the original multi-copy toggle switch (MC) or no plasmid are shown as controls, and growth was measured for cells held in the ATc-induced green state (left) or IPTG-induced red state (right). Data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates. See also Figures S3 and S4 and Tables S2 and S3. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 329-336DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Development of Genetic Kill Switches Using the Integrated Single-Copy Toggle (A) Schematic of the kill switch in the “survival” and “death” states. TetR blocks LacI and toxin expression in the survival state, while LacI repression of TetR enables toxin expression and cell death in the death state. (B) Kill switch stability and function was measured by colony-forming units (CFUs) in the survival state following removal of IPTG (left) and in the death state following ATc induction (right). Kill switches containing the EcoRI or CcdB toxins do not affect cell viability in the survival state, but cause cell viability to drop to <1 × 10−4 in the death state. (C) Long-term robustness test for the CcdB and EcoRI kill switches. Cells containing the indicated kill switches were passaged in the survival state for 72 hr, and subpopulations of these cells were periodically switched to the death state with ATc. Cells passaged for 72 hr displayed comparable kill kinetics to those tested at 0 hr. Data are represented as mean ± SD of three replicates. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 329-336DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.006) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions