Integrating Taxonomies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

Symmetrically Exploiting XML Shuohao Zhang and Curtis Dyreson School of E.E. and Computer Science Washington State University Pullman, Washington, USA.
Schema Matching and Query Rewriting in Ontology-based Data Integration Zdeňka Linková ICS AS CR Advisor: Július Štuller.
Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web AnHai Doan, Jayant Madhavan, Pedro Domingos, and Alon Halevy Databases and Data Mining group University.
Amit Shvarchenberg and Rafi Sayag. Based on a paper by: Robin Dhamankar, Yoonkyong Lee, AnHai Doan Department of Computer Science University of Illinois,
Maurice Hermans.  Ontologies  Ontology Mapping  Research Question  String Similarities  Winkler Extension  Proposed Extension  Evaluation  Results.
Machine Learning and the Semantic Web
Research topics Semantic Web - Spring 2007 Computer Engineering Department Sharif University of Technology.
Merging Taxonomies. Assertion Creation and maintenance of large ontologies will require the capability to merge taxonomies This problem is similar to.
Interactive Generation of Integrated Schemas Laura Chiticariu et al. Presented by: Meher Talat Shaikh.
Xyleme A Dynamic Warehouse for XML Data of the Web.
Ontologies IS 277 Spring Outline n Ontologies n Types of ontologies n Examples n Ontology engineering n Ontology standards n Machine-readable ontologies.
Mapping Between Taxonomies Elena Eneva 27 Sep 2001 Advanced IR Seminar.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 8 The Enhanced Entity- Relationship (EER) Model.
Gimme’ The Context: Context- driven Automatic Semantic Annotation with CPANKOW Philipp Cimiano et al.
Reconciling Schemas of Disparate Data Sources: A Machine-Learning Approach AnHai Doan Pedro Domingos Alon Halevy.
Mapping Between Taxonomies Elena Eneva 11 Dec 2001 Advanced IR Seminar.
1 CIS607, Fall 2005 Semantic Information Integration Presentation by Enrico Viglino Week 3 (Oct. 12)
Reconciling Schemas of Disparate Data Sources: A Machine-Learning Approach AnHai Doan Pedro Domingos Alon Halevy.
Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web AnHai Doan Jayant Madhavan Robin Dhamankar Pedro Domingos Alon Halevy.
Schema Matching Algorithms Phil Bernstein CSE 590sw February 2003.
XML on Semantic Web. Outline The Semantic Web Ontology XML Probabilistic DTD References.
PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment Natalya F. Noy and Mark A. Musen.
Generic Schema Matching with Cupid Jayant Madhavan Philip A. Bernstein Erhard Raham Proceedings of the 27 th VLDB Conference.
QoM: Qualitative and Quantitative Measure of Schema Matching Naiyana Tansalarak and Kajal T. Claypool (Kajal Claypool - presenter) University of Massachusetts,
Xiaomeng Su & Jon Atle Gulla Dept. of Computer and Information Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway June 2004 Semantic.
Ontology matching ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΑΙΓΑΙΟΥ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΩΝ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΑΚΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΠΙΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΚΩΝ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΩΝ Πρόγραμμα Μεταπτυχιακών Σπουδών
OMAP: An Implemented Framework for Automatically Aligning OWL Ontologies SWAP, December, 2005 Raphaël Troncy, Umberto Straccia ISTI-CNR
Semantic Interoperability Jérôme Euzenat INRIA & LIG France Natasha Noy Stanford University USA.
CONTI’2008, 5-6 June 2008, TIMISOARA 1 Towards a digital content management system Gheorghe Sebestyen-Pal, Tünde Bálint, Bogdan Moscaliuc, Agnes Sebestyen-Pal.
Ontology Alignment/Matching Prafulla Palwe. Agenda ► Introduction  Being serious about the semantic web  Living with heterogeneity  Heterogeneity problem.
Knowledge Discovery in Ontology Learning A survey.
An Integrated Approach to Extracting Ontological Structures from Folksonomies Huairen Lin, Joseph Davis, Ying Zhou ESWC 2009 Hyewon Lim October 9 th, 2009.
Bayesian Networks. Male brain wiring Female brain wiring.
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE IN ONTOLOGY MATCHING Pavel Shvaiko joint work with Fausto Giunchiglia and Mikalai Yatskevich INFINT 2007 Bertinoro Workshop on Information.
Learning Object Metadata Mining Masoud Makrehchi Supervisor: Prof. Mohamed Kamel.
Review of the web page classification approaches and applications Luu-Ngoc Do Quang-Nhat Vo.
1 ENTROPY-BASED CONCEPT SHIFT DETECTION PETER VORBURGER, ABRAHAM BERNSTEIN IEEE ICDM 2006 Speaker: Li HueiJyun Advisor: Koh JiaLing Date:2007/11/6 1.
Partially Supervised Classification of Text Documents by Bing Liu, Philip Yu, and Xiaoli Li Presented by: Rick Knowles 7 April 2005.
updated CmpE 583 Fall 2008 Ontology Integration- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION Atilla ELÇİ Computer.
Web Taxonomy Integration through Co-Bootstrapping Dell Zhang National University of Singapore Wee Sun Lee National University of Singapore SIGIR’04.
Automatic Image Annotation by Using Concept-Sensitive Salient Objects for Image Content Representation Jianping Fan, Yuli Gao, Hangzai Luo, Guangyou Xu.
A Classification of Schema-based Matching Approaches Pavel Shvaiko Meaning Coordination and Negotiation Workshop, ISWC 8 th November 2004, Hiroshima, Japan.
Expert Systems with Applications 34 (2008) 459–468 Multi-level fuzzy mining with multiple minimum supports Yeong-Chyi Lee, Tzung-Pei Hong, Tien-Chin Wang.
Semantic web course – Computer Engineering Department – Sharif Univ. of Technology – Fall Knowledge Representation Semantic Web - Fall 2005 Computer.
Towards Distributed Information Retrieval in the Semantic Web: Query Reformulation Using the Framework Wednesday 14 th of June, 2006.
ISWC2007, Nov. 14. Discovering simple mappings between Relational database schemas and ontologies Wei Hu, Yuzhong Qu {whu,
Some questions -What is metadata? -Data about data.
S calable K nowledge C omposition Ontology Interoperation January 19, 1999 Jan Jannink, Prasenjit Mitra, Srinivasan Pichai, Danladi Verheijen, Gio Wiederhold.
HAITHAM BOU AMMAR MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY Transfer for Supervised Learning Tasks.
Catalog Integration R. Agrawal, R. Srikant: WWW-10.
Semantic Mappings for Data Mediation
University of the Aegean AI – LAB ESWC 2008 From Conceptual to Instance Matching George A. Vouros AI Lab Department of Information and Communication Systems.
The Semantic Web and Ontology. The Semantic Web WWW: –syntactic transmission of information –only processible by human – no semantic conservation of the.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
Instance Discovery and Schema Matching With Applications to Biological Deep Web Data Integration Tantan Liu, Fan Wang, Gagan Agrawal {liut, wangfa,
Semantic Interoperability in GIS N. L. Sarda Suman Somavarapu.
BAYESIAN LEARNING. 2 Bayesian Classifiers Bayesian classifiers are statistical classifiers, and are based on Bayes theorem They can calculate the probability.
Of 24 lecture 11: ontology – mediation, merging & aligning.
Cross-Ontological Relationships
The Role of Ontologies for Mapping the Domain of Landscape Architecture An introduction.
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Google China Faculty Summit
Result of Ontology Alignment with RiMOM at OAEI’06
Web Taxonomy Integration through Co-Bootstrapping
Property consolidation for entity browsing
State of the Art Ontology Mapping
Web Mining Research: A Survey
Integrating Class Hierarchies
Presentation transcript:

Integrating Taxonomies 瞿裕忠(Yuzhong Qu) yzqu@nju.edu.cn

Outline Integrating catalogs Leaning to matching ontologies WWW2001 Leaning to matching ontologies VLDB2003 Merging ontologies JWS2006

Reference Agrawal R, Srikant R. On integrating catalogs. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2001: 603-612. [157] Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos,P., and Halevy, A.Y. Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web. VLDB J. 12(4) (2003), 303-319 [467] Kotis K, Vouros G A, Stergiou K. Towards automatic merging of domain ontologies: The HCONE-merge approach. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2006, 4(1): 60-79. [91]

Integrating Catalogs S1 Sm C1 Cn d1 d2

Naive Bayes Classification

Enhanced Algorithm Similarity information implicit in the source Documents in the same source category are more likely belong to the same target category (in the master catalog)

Enhanced Algorithm (ENB)

Enhanced Algorithm (ENB)

Analysis and Experiment The highest accuracy achievable with the enhanced technique can be no worse than what can be achieved with the standard Naive Bayes classification. Experiments indicate that the proposed technique can result in large accuracy improvements.

Learning to match ontologies

The GLUE architecture

Joint probability distribution

Estimating the joint distribution of concepts

The Learners The Content Learner The Name Learner The Meta-Learner

Domain-Independent Constraints Neighborhood Two nodes match if their children also match. Two nodes match if their parents match and at least x% of their children also match. Two nodes match if their parents match and some of their descendants also match. Union If all children of node X match node Y, then X also matches Y.

Relaxation labeling

Experiments Removed all nodes with fewer than 5 instances On average only 30 to 90 data instances per leaf node

Matching accuracy of GLUE Intermediate approaches: firstly convert one data model to the other, and then reuse certain schema matching or ontology matching methods to discover simple mappings

Ontology merging problem Mapping them to an intermediate ontology. Get the minimal union of their (translated) vocabularies and axioms with respect to their alignment.

S-morphism and the intermediate ontology Semantic homomorphism (preserving partial order)

Entity category and taxonomy

More reference Zhang D, Lee W S. Web taxonomy integration using support vector machines. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2004:472-481. [60] Flouris G, Manakanatas D, Kondylakis H, et al. Ontology change: Classification and survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2008, 23(2): 117-152. [189]

致谢 http://ws.nju.edu.cn