Make a list of 5 things that you would say might be wrong in certain situations Compare your list with the person next to you and come up with a common.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
Advertisements

Applying Situational Ethics and Utilitarianism to Sexual Ethics
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Moral Relativism.
Is this true? Is the right thing to do always the most loving thing?
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Virtue.
Presented by: Nathan Bennett Terri Small PJ White.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Ethical Pluralism and Relativism
Ethics and ethical systems 12 January
AS Philosophy & Ethics Mrs Sudds What are your expectations?
Subjectivism LO: I will know what Subjectivism is Hmk: Exam practice. Explain the view that Ethics are relative (25). Spend about half an hour writing.
Ethical Theory: Absolute & Relativist theory L.O: Be able to understand the concepts of absolutist & relativist morality Explain the characteristics of.
Types of Ethics LO’s: To describe a number of ethical theories.
Two ethical systems LO: I will know about Absolutism and Relativism I will evaluate Relativism Recap: What is Ethics? Starter question: Define “good” and.
What is right for you may not be right for someone else. Ethical Relativism.
Chapter 1 Understanding Ethics
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
LP 5-Ethical Theories Presentation Peggy Jerdee Liliana Granado Nikki Mora Justin Summeril March 22, 2009 Ethical Relativism.
Revision whizz through relativism A recap from the start: – Teleological and Deontological – Absolutism Plato and the ‘forms’ – Relativism Protagorus Aristotle.
INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Absolutism and the Euthyphro dilemma LO: I will know what is meant by absolutism I will attempt to resolve the Euthyphro dilemma Hmk: Come up with some.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Is there a Culture that is the Best, that all others should strive to become more like?
On a blank sheet of paper: (do not write you name on it!)  Name 2-3 things (actions) that you think are wrong/evil/immoral. You can be as general or as.
Lecture 1 Introduction to Ethics. Chapter Overview Introduction Review of some ethical theories Comparing workable ethical theories 1-2.
Morality and the Moral Life. Ethics (moral philosophy): The study of morality using the methods of philosophy. Morality: Our beliefs about right and wrong.
Developing as an Ethical Reasoner
The Walk and Talk of Wisdom
Basic concepts in Ethics
Activity – Pure sex appeal
Natural Law and Thomas Aquinas
What is Philosophy?.
Conscience.
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Is torture wrong? If so, why?
Contemporary Moral Problems
Chapter 1 Understanding Ethics
BASIC ETHICS. BASIC ETHICS 1. CONSEQUENTALISM VS UTILITARIANISM AGENDA 1. CONSEQUENTALISM VS UTILITARIANISM 2. HARM PRINCIPLE 3. DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE.
Act and rule Utilitarianism
What is ethics?. What is ethics? “Ethics is about my feelings” Agree or disagree?
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Lecture 01: A Brief Summary
John Stuart Mill.
Situation ethics lesson 4
Introduction to Ethics
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
ETHICS BOWL CONSEQUENTIALism.
What can you remember? Outline at least one problem with the definition of Omnipotence simply being “Can do anything”. Summarise the Paradox of the.
Absolute and Relative Morality
Studying Ethics Why bother?.
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
Why Study Ethics and computing?
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Think, Pair, Share A: What is the Summum Bonum? B: What is the Categorical imperative? A: Who was J.S Mill? B: What is the Hedonic Calculus?
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
Think, Pair, Share A: What is your intuition? B: Is intuition something we should rely on? A: Give an example to illustrate how we might use intuition.
Make a list of 5 things that you would say might be wrong in certain situations 5 mins Bottom of test yourself page in booklet.
Philosophy A Brief Introduction.
What is Ethics Ethics is the philosophical study of good and bad, right and wrong. Ethics is concerned with morality and is often called ‘moral philosophy’.
Philosophy March 2nd Objective Opener
The Review Game: -Get your question right, score a point and get the bonus(rebus or basket) for another point (2 total). -If you get your question wrong,
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.)
Fallacies.
What Are Ethics? What are the objectives?
1 Division within the church
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Make a list of 5 things that you would say might be wrong in certain situations Compare your list with the person next to you and come up with a common list with which you both agree. Order the items, from ‘most likely to always be wrong’ to ‘least likely to always be wrong’ For each of the 5 items, give a plausible exception where you might be justified in breaking the rule 5 mins Bottom of test yourself page in booklet

Key Question: ‘Are some things only right or wrong for certain people, times and cultures?’ Refer to timeline

the view that there are no universal moral norms. Moral Relativism the view that there are no universal moral norms. things are not wrong or right in and of themselves what is wrong in some circumstances can be right in others 15 10 min

Relativism is being promoted in today’s world 14th April 2007 Julian Baggini For millennia, most people believed that right was right and wrong was wrong, and that was all there was to it. Now university lecturers report that their fresh-faced new students take it as obvious that there is no such thing as ‘’the truth’’ and that morality is relative. In educated circles at least, only the naïve believe in objectivity.’ Put in to booklet Discuss – do you agree?

Types of relativism The 2 main types of relativism are subjective moral relativism and cultural relativism. What do you think these mean? Subjective Moral: an argument which is based on personal views or wishes. Cultural relativism: where what is right or wrong depends on the culture.

PROTAGORAS (Ancient Greek philosopher): Subjective Moral Relativism There is no truth in anything beyond the way it seems. There is no objective knowledge, because all knowledge depends upon the perceptions of the person. There’s no objective truth. Truth is only true for you, or true for me. Man is the measure of all things. Is one of us more right than the other? Does it matter if we think different things? – no unless it hurts someone? How do you draw that line. Is this ethics?

Subjective Moral Relativism If I say ‘I like marmite’ and you say ‘I like marmite’ both of us are right Protagoras said moral statements were like this If someone says they think ‘abortion is right’, and another says they think ‘abortion is wrong’ both are saying things that are true because they are the truth for each person. What is right for one person could be wrong for another so morality depends on your perspective. Write a short explanation Can you see any problems with this?

Cultural Relativism Different cultures have different moral codes. Therefore, there is no objective ‘truth’ in morality. Right or wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions vary from culture to culture Cultural relativism refers to not judging a culture to our own standards of what is right or wrong, strange or normal. Instead, we should try to understand cultural practices of other groups in its own cultural context. Cultural relativism Customs Tradition Language Ideology Politics Religion 15mins CULTURAL RELATIVISM = The theory that moral rules can be determined by the culture you belong to: what is morally right in one culture might not be morally right in another. Chinese and westerners have different concepts of human rights. They should not intervene with each other’s moral practice.’ ‘Polygamy is wrong in western societies but not so in the Middle East. The ethics of marriage is just a matter of social norm.’

Chinese and westerners have different concepts of human rights Chinese and westerners have different concepts of human rights. They should not intervene with each other’s moral practice.’ ‘Polygamy is wrong in western societies but not so in the Middle East. The ethics of marriage is just a matter of social norm.’ Cultural Relativism Different… Customs Tradition Language Ideology Politics Religion 15mins CULTURAL RELATIVISM = The theory that moral rules can be determined by the culture you belong to: what is morally right in one culture might not be morally right in another.

Why is cultural relativism more attractive than individual relativism? The need for common moral codes within a nation/culture The value of tolerance in international politics

Cultural Relativism In a story recorded by Herodotus in the Histories, King Darius observed that while certain Greeks burnt the bodies of their fathers, a different group of people called the Callations ate the bodies of their fathers. He brought the two groups together and asked how much he would have to pay them to adopt the practice of the other. In both cases the groups were outraged at the suggestion and refused to follow the practice of the other for any amount of money. What was right for one tribe was wrong for the other. 15mins CULTURAL RELATIVISM = The theory that moral rules can be determined by the culture you belong to: what is morally right in one culture might not be morally right in another.

What does this picture represent?

Strengths of relativism It allows people to find happiness and fulfilment in relationships, without being bound by duties. It is more “in tune” with the modern world than absolutism. It can appeal to religious and non-religious people alike. It encourages people to examine ideas from the perspectives of others and other cultures

But, what are the Weaknesses of relativism? Some acts are inherently selfish and wrong - there have to be at least some fixed moral rules. Relative values like ‘love’ and ‘happiness’ are difficult to apply. People will disagree about their meaning. Nobody’s ideas, morals, ethics are better than anyone else’s

Consequences of cultural relativism One cannot criticize the moral practices of other societies. Cultural/social norms become the basis of moral judgment. We ‘should’ be tolerant to other societies’ moral practices if they do not harm us.

A Question… Suppose we are in a society with people coming from different cultures, what can the government do to deal with their conflicts of values?

The harm principle ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.’ John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

A terminally ill man asks his wife to help him commit suicide. How would Subjective Moral Relativism be used to solve the following dilemmas? A 15-year-old girl is pregnant after being raped, and is considering abortion. A terminally ill man asks his wife to help him commit suicide. A man is considering committing adultery on his wife who has Alzheimer's and cannot remember him.

How would Cultural Relativism be used to solve the following dilemmas? A 15-year-old girl is pregnant after being raped, and is considering abortion. A terminally ill man asks his wife to help him commit suicide. A man is considering committing adultery on his wife who has Alzheimer's and cannot remember him.

THINK…Where are you…? absolutist relativist