Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized (world population) death rates per 100 000 persons for the year 2014 (blue, ... Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized.
Advertisements

Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response relationships between air temperature and myocardial infarction ... Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Flowchart of our CIS cohort considering patients (A) and eyes (B) as statistical unit. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the study
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 3 Multivariate regression analysis to display the impact of recanalization on the formation of ischaemic brain ... Figure 3 Multivariate regression.
Figure 1 Increased absolute mean curvature in very premature-born adults. Statistical parametric map of group ... Figure 1 Increased absolute mean curvature.
Figure 1 Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier curves for all-cause mortality in the transcatheter mitral valve repair and ... Figure 1 Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier curves.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
(A) mSchober in DESIR; (B) mSchober in SPACE; (C) LSF ...
Figure 1. Linkage analyses of the SNPs in the MRE11 gene and haplotype blocks. Haplotype blocks were defined for all ... Figure 1. Linkage analyses of.
Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Figure 1 Comparison of MITRA-FR and COAPT trial outcomes
Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...
bDMARD: biologic DMARD.
Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.
Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.
Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.
x-axis, post-partum days. Closed ...
Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants screened, enrolled and followed-up between 1 July 2015 and 31 May Fig. 1. A flowchart of cohort participants.
Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs
Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects
Figure 1. Susceptibility of all P
Figure 1. Profiles of the top 50 mRNA probes of the first gene signature identified in the South African cohort. ... Figure 1. Profiles of the top 50 mRNA.
Figure 1 Cumulative late adjusted survival in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator and pacemaker patients. ... Figure 1 Cumulative late adjusted.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Figure 1. Flow diagram for selection of articles for systematic review. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content.
Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.
Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.
Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion of daptomycin resistance of isolate 5 passaged in vitro. This figure ... Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Summary of patient-level SC-FC analysis pipeline
Figure 1 Visuomotor grip force-tracking set-up and conditions
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.
Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Patient selection
The independent additive value of total greyscale + power Doppler synovitis ... The independent additive value of total greyscale + power Doppler synovitis.
Figure 1. Observed mean (SD) micafungin plasma concentrations.
Figure 1. Sequential programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-(L)1) blockade and osimertinib schema of patients who developed ... Figure 1. Sequential programmed.
Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms
Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.
Figure 1 Patient selection.
Fig. 1 Query formulation process in CLIR
The figure shows the fraction of ...
Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result
Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of AAV in three clinically relevant disease categories defined by clinical ... Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of.
Figure 3. Key words and phrases from narrative text by classification category. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to.
Figure 1 NMF in ADD patients and classification of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease participants. Grey matter ... Figure 1 NMF in ADD patients and classification.
Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2
Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.
Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA
Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curves showing the impact of the different pretreatment HIV-1 drug resistance categories on the ... Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curves.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events. Each subfigure displays the unfiltered EEG data (blue), the ... Figure 1 Three example candidate spike ripple events. Each subfigure displays the unfiltered EEG data (blue), the bandpass filtered EEG data (100–300 Hz, red), and the spectrogram of the EEG data in an interval surrounding the spike ripple event (dashed vertical lines) with power (in decibels) shown in colour. Both reviewers classified the candidate spike ripple events (A) as a true spike ripple, (B) as a false spike ripple, or (C) the reviewers disagreed on the classification. In (A), a distinct high frequency ‘spectral island’ is visually evident in the spectrogram, and a ripple is visually evident on the spike in the unfiltered data. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 The spike ripple rate is significantly higher in patients with active BECTS, and decreases with each ... Figure 3 The spike ripple rate is significantly higher in patients with active BECTS, and decreases with each seizure-free month. (A) Each circle indicates the spike ripple rate (detections/min) for a subject, which are divided into three categories. All patients with active BECTS (red circles) have non-zero spike ripple rates, whereas no healthy controls and only two seizure-free patients with BECTS have non-zero spike ripple rates. (B) The spike ripple rate versus time since last seizure for all patients with BECTS. Red (grey) circles indicate patients with active (seizure-free) BECTS. The rate decreases with time since last seizure (black curve indicates model fit, mean in solid, 95% CI in dashed lines). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2 Spike ripples are more spatially discrete than spikes Figure 2 Spike ripples are more spatially discrete than spikes. The normalized spike ripple rate and the spike ... Figure 2 Spike ripples are more spatially discrete than spikes. The normalized spike ripple rate and the spike amplitude at the primary channel (1°), secondary channels (2°), and tertiary channels (3°). Each circle indicates one patient, and the bar height indicates the median across patients. As the distance from the primary channel increases, both measures decrease, although the decrease is significantly faster for the spike ripple rate. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 6 Fully automated spike detection performance Figure 6 Fully automated spike detection performance. (A) The spike rate is higher in patients with active BECTS. (B) ... Figure 6 Fully automated spike detection performance. (A) The spike rate is higher in patients with active BECTS. (B) A logistic regression model (black curves, mean in solid, 95% CIs in dashed) indicates a significant increase in the odds of active BECTS with increasing spike rate. (C) From the ROC curve (black), the optimal operating point (blue) is used for classification. (D) No relationship between the spike rate and time since last seizure is detected. The black curve indicates a generalized linear model fit with mean (solid) and 95% CIs (dashed). In all figures, red (grey) circles indicate patients with active BECTS (seizure-free BECTS). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4 Manually detected spikes performance Figure 4 Manually detected spikes performance. (A) The spike rate is higher in patients with active BECTS, though most ... Figure 4 Manually detected spikes performance. (A) The spike rate is higher in patients with active BECTS, though most seizure-free subjects have a non-zero spike rate. Each circle indicates the spike rate (events/min) for the three patient categories. (B) No relationship between the spike rate and time since last seizure is detected. The black curve indicates a generalized linear model fit with mean (solid) and 95% CIs (dashed). In both figures, red (grey) circles indicate patients with active BECTS (seizure-free BECTS). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5 Analysis of fully automated detection of spike ripple events produces consistent results. (A) The spike ... Figure 5 Analysis of fully automated detection of spike ripple events produces consistent results. (A) The spike ripple rate is higher in patients with active BECTS. Each circle indicates the spike ripple rate (events/min) for the three patient categories. (B) Patients separated into those with active BECTS (red circles) and seizure-free (grey circles). A logistic regression model (black curves, mean in solid, 95% CIs in dashed) indicates a significant increase in the odds of active BECTS with increasing spike ripple rate. (C) From the ROC curve (black), the optimal operating point (blue) is used for classification. (D) The spike ripple rate decreases with time since last seizure. The black curve indicates a generalized linear model fit with mean (solid) and 95% CIs (dashed). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Brain, awz059, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz059 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.