Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR (N = 65). Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals are represented, along with the description of overall response rates for each cut-off value. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; vs, versus; wt, wild-type. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Annals of Oncology, Volume 30, Issue 5, 06 March 2019, Pages 796–803, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.


Download ppt "Figure 1. Overall response rates in wild-type versus RAS and RAS/BRAF mutations detected by nanofluidic digital PCR ... Figure 1. Overall response rates."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google