Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Cumulative Effects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Advertisements

Baffinland Mary River Project Environmental Assessment Methods Marine Environment VECs Workshop Session 02 November 2011.
Environment Canada Presentation to Nunavut Impact Review Board Regarding Baffinland Mary River Project NIRB Prehearing Conference Pond Inlet and Igloolik,
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
Mary River Project Early Revenue Phase NPC Oral Hearings January 2014.
Baffinland Iron Mines Mary River Project November Pre-Hearing Conference Igloolik & Pond Inlet.
Baffinland Iron Mines Mary River Project November 2011 Community Round-Table Igloolik and Pond Inlet.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
Investing in the logistics necessary for Africa's Oil and Gas Industry.
Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Information Meetings
UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 13 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of SIA are to: F analyse how proposals affect people F identify and mitigate adverse.
KIVALLIQ WILDLIFE BOARD, RANKIN INLET AND CHESTERFIELD HTO NIRB: MELIADINE GOLD PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) TECHNICAL COMMENTS.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Assessing Effects on Human Health Meadowbank Gold Project Margaux Brisco Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearings, Baker Lake, Nunavut March 27 to 31,
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
AN INTRODUCTION TO CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT.
Izok Corridor Project: Kitikmeot Community Visit
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Managing Hydropower, Mining and Infrastructure Development Impacts on Natural Capital Iain Watson Senior Environmental.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
Qikiqtani Inuit Association Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting and Pre-Hearing Conference January 16 th and 17 th, 2013.
2006 Cumulative Effects Assessment CEA Definition  Potential for residual project-specific effects associated with Meadowbank project in combination.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Potential Impacts on Biodiversity and Livelihoods Win Maung Chairman Myanmar Environment Institute (MEI)
Andrew Burwood, Sean Cullen, Gillian Davidson, Pierre Pelletier Rescan Environmental Services IAIA Conference, Seoul, 6 June 2007 IFC Performance Standards.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
Processes influencing biodiversity Learning intention To understand the factors the influence biodiversity.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
P.O. Box 18 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut X0B 0C0 Telephone: Fax: Kitikmeot Inuit Association Summary of Technical Issues.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
Soil Conservation.
Allington Waste Management Facility
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Andrew Haywood123, Andrew Mellor13,
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
MADRID – BOSTON PROPOSAL PHASE 2 OF THE HOPE BAY PROJECT
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Niagara River Area of Concern
Diversions Update committed to our coast Kyle Graham, CPRA
5. Impact assessment world café: Cumulative impacts
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Atmospheric Environment
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Freshwater Environment
Brackish Water Desalination Project Draft EIR
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Human Environment
Environmental Impact Assessment EIA
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Marine Environment
WHALE TAIL PIT Expansion Project
WHALE TAIL PIT Expansion Project
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
Regional Environmental Health Specialist
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.’s Whale Tail Pit Expansion Project
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Cumulative Effects Technical Meetings April 8-10, 2019 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Cumulative Effects

Introduction & Overview Confidential

Relevant Projects or Activities Potential Interactions of Other Projects and Activities Relevant Projects or Activities Climate Change Air Quality Noise and Vibration Landforms, Soil and Permafrost Vegetation Migratory Birds and Habitat Terrestrial Wildlife and Habitat Water Quantity Water Quality Freshwater Fish, Fish Habitat and Biota Marine Ice, Water and Sediment Quality Marine Habitat and Biota Marine Mammals Population Demographics Education and Training Livelihood and Employment Economic development and self-reliance Human Health and Well-Being Community Infrastructure and Public Service Culture, Resources and Land Use Contracting and Business Opportunities Benefits, Taxes and Royalties Governance and leadership Past Nanisivik Mine (Decommissioned) X Mary River Project Definition Phase Diamond Exploration Existing Nanisivik Naval Facility and Military Exercises Back River and Hope Bay Projects Regional Ship Traffic Regional Air Transport Communities, Traditional/Recreational Land Use Regional Monitoring Programs Baffinland Regional Exploration Reasonably Foreseeable Tullurutiup Imanga/ Lancaster Sound NMCA Potential Future Development Mine Deposits No. 2 to 5 until 2055

Community Feedback No concerns raised specifically about cumulative effects Concerns raised that are relevant to the cumulative effects assessment: Project effects on Inuit land use activities: travel around railway, and harvesting; Project effects on marine mammals; Project effects on caribou;

Summary of FEIS Results Confidential

Summary of Effects Assessment VEC/VSEC Characterization of Residual Effect(s) Significance Rating Terrestrial Environment Majority of biophysical cumulative effects identified are associated with the potential future development scenario Cumulative effects to wildlife as the result of climate change are not significant Cumulative effects will occur to vegetation abundance, diversity, and health Climate change is expected to result in an increase in vegetation biomass Increased biomass provides minor offsetting effects Vegetation species composition will change with the expansion of shrub and graminoid coverage due to climate change Health effects on vegetation associated with dust deposition are not significant Cumulative effects on vegetation are not significant Phase 2 Proposal has minor effects on caribou that are manageable by mitigation Majority of cumulative effects are related to minor contributions to habitat loss or sensory disturbance Potential future development scenario has the potential to create cumulative effects to caribou Regional exploration by Baffinland also creates disturbance outside of the PDA Not significant Human Environment Cumulative socio-economic effects are largely positive, with adverse effects associated with the potential future development Not significant, Significant (positive) Atmospheric Environment GHG emissions will contribute incrementally to global climate change Air quality, noise and vibration, and landforms, soils, and permafrost have localized effects but no significant cumulative effects Difficult to assess climate change effects Freshwater Environment Cumulative effects to water quantity could occur from water withdrawal from expanded camps during potential future development Cumulative effects to water quality may occur from increased effluent during potential future development Mitigation for water quantity and water quality to reduce effects Offsetting measures and design changes will address the cumulative effects of potential future development on freshwater fish habitat Marine Environment Cumulative effects to marine ice, water, and sediment quality are not significant Under the potential future development scenario, cumulative effects will result from ice breaking but are not significant Ringed seals are affected by ice disturbance during potential future development Narwhals, beluga, and bowhead whales in offshore Baffin Bay are affected by potential future development Cumulative effects on Inuit land use from ice breaking and increased regional ship traffic may result from potential future development Confidential

Information Request and Technical Comment Review Confidential

Information Request

Technical Recommendation Summary Technical Recommendation Category Main Issues Recommendation IDs Summary of Response and Discussion Items Cumulative Effects Information requested on potential cumulative effects of project alternatives CIRNAC 18 Such an analysis would be hypothetical, and would not support a meaningful assessment of cumulative effects Alternatives were evaluated in TSD 01, including their effects Baffinland will work with CIRNAC to determine approach to consideration of potential cumulative interactions of project alternatives Information requested on cumulative effects of water crossings DFO 3.11.2 All crossings, temporary or permanent, will be modelled and designed according to requirements for fish passage. This information and design criteria will reduce potential for cumulative impacts with any other crossing structures on the same waterways. Confirm that all CEA TCs are considered discussion items. No “Technical Recommendations Summary” slide(s) produced. Confidential

Technical Recommendation Summary Technical Recommendation Category Main Issues Recommendation IDs Summary of Response and Discussion Items Cumulative Effects Requests additional analysis of cumulative caribou habitat loss GN 15 A revised CEA has been prepared and includes direct and indirect caribou habitat loss. Recommendation to expand cumulative effects assessment to include Baffinland’s plans for future development GN 26 Future development scenarios are not reasonably foreseeable, as per NIRB’s definition; therefore, expansion of CEA not required. Additional clarity on project and cumulative shipping PC 03 Additional discussion on the number of types of ships in the area has been provided in an updated CEA. Additional information on the cumulative effects of wind turbines QIA 02 Wind turbines have been removed from the Project. “Revised CEA was to be ready for the technical meetings.” Confidential