Jun Xu, Roger W. Hendrix, Robert L. Duda  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Genetics DNA RNA Protein Phenotype Genome Gene
Advertisements

Unit 4 Proteins Transcription (DNA to mRNA) Translation (mRNA to tRNA to proteins) Gene expression/regulation (turning genes on and off) Viruses 1.
Chapter 17 Notes From Gene to Protein.
Today: Genetic Technology Wrap-up Exam Review Remember: Final Exam is Wednesday, 12/13 at 1 pm!
RNA and Protein Synthesis
Protein Synthesis Chapter Protein synthesis- the production of proteins The amount and kind of proteins produced in a cell determine the structure.
Protein Synthesis. Transcription DNA  mRNA Occurs in the nucleus Translation mRNA  tRNA  AA Occurs at the ribosome.
From DNA to Proteins. Same two steps produce all proteins: 1) DNA is transcribed to form RNA –Occurs in the nucleus –RNA moves into cytoplasm 2) RNA is.
Microbial Genetics.  DNA replication is semi- conservative:  What does it mean? During cell division, each daughter cell inherits 2 DNA strands, One.
Genetic Code and Interrupted Gene Chapter 4. Genetic Code and Interrupted Gene Aala A. Abulfaraj.
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Figure 2. S-tagged SEAP binding to S-protein-coated plates is linear
Enzymes and their functions involved in DNA replication
10-3 Protein Synthesis Together, all 3 types of RNA synthesize proteins. Proteins are polymers. Polypeptides linked by peptide bonds. Made of 20 different.
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
From DNA to Proteins Chapter 14.
High incidence of somatic mutations in the AML1/RUNX1 gene in myelodysplastic syndrome and low blast percentage myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia by.
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Essential Question: How cells make proteins
Antigenic Variation in Lyme Disease Borreliae by Promiscuous Recombination of VMP- like Sequence Cassettes  Jing-Ren Zhang, John M Hardham, Alan G Barbour,
Brian C Horsburgh, Heike Kollmus, Hansjörg Hauser, Donald M Coen  Cell 
Central Dogma
Psoriasis Upregulated Phorbolin-1 Shares Structural but not Functional Similarity to the mRNA-Editing Protein Apobec-1  Peder Madsen, Julio E. Celis,
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Adam C Bell, Adam G West, Gary Felsenfeld  Cell 
Chapter 9 Using the Genetic Code.
Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell 
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Mutations in a Novel Gene with Transmembrane Domains Underlie Usher Syndrome Type 3  Tarja Joensuu, Riikka Hämäläinen, Bo Yuan, Cheryl Johnson, Saara.
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
A Role for REP Sequences in Regulating Translation
Properties of H. volcanii tRNA Intron Endonuclease Reveal a Relationship between the Archaeal and Eucaryal tRNA Intron Processing Systems  Karen Kleman-Leyer,
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Identification and differential expression of human collagenase-3 mRNA species derived from internal deletion, alternative splicing, and different polyadenylation.
CHAPTER 10 Molecular Biology of the Gene
GENE EXPRESSION / PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Complex Polymorphisms in an ∼330 kDa Protein Are Linked to Chloroquine-Resistant P. falciparum in Southeast Asia and Africa  Xin-zhuan Su, Laura A. Kirkman,
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Scot A Wolfe, Elizabeth I Ramm, Carl O Pabo  Structure 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
ChIC and ChEC Molecular Cell
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
A Distinct DNA-Methylation Boundary in the 5′- Upstream Sequence of the FMR1 Promoter Binds Nuclear Proteins and Is Lost in Fragile X Syndrome  Anja Naumann,
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Ribosome Collision Is Critical for Quality Control during No-Go Decay
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
James W. Smyth, Robin M. Shaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Shifty Ciliates  Lawrence A. Klobutcher, Philip J. Farabaugh  Cell 
Danna K Morris, Victoria Lundblad  Current Biology 
Translation Initiation from the Ribosomal A Site or the P Site, Dependent on the Conformation of RNA Pseudoknot I in Dicistrovirus RNAs  Nobuhiko Kamoshita,
Adam T. McGeoch, Stephen D. Bell  Cell 
Nonsense-Associated Altered Splicing
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Molecular Mechanism of Drug-Dependent Ribosome Stalling
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (May 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Conserved Translational Frameshift in dsDNA Bacteriophage Tail Assembly Genes  Jun Xu, Roger W. Hendrix, Robert L. Duda  Molecular Cell  Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 11-21 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006

Figure 1 Programmed Translational Frameshift Regions among the Tail Genes of Phages λ, HK97, and Mu (A–C) Frameshifting in λ was described previously (Levin et al., 1993); HK97 and Mu are considered in this report. (A) A map of the λ genes V, G/GT, and H shows the nested relationship of proteins gpG and gpGT, the frameshift product. Gene V encodes the major tail protein, and gene H encodes the tail length tape measure protein. Gene T was defined genetically, but no independent polypeptide is made from the T open reading frame. The vertical arrow between the G and T ORFs indicates the frameshift site, and this region and its translation in the relevant reading frames is expanded underneath. Ribosomes enter the slippery sequence GGGAAAG in the G reading frame (upper line) and either continue on to the end of gene G, 6 codons downstream, or, 3.5% of the time, shift back one base on the mRNA into the T reading frame and continue to the end of T, 145 codons downstream. (B) A map of the comparable region of the HK97 genome. The arrangement is the same as for λ, except that an extra gene (gene 15) and its associated transcription promoter and terminator are inserted between “T” and “H.” (C) A map of the comparable region of the Mu genome. Two alternative shifted frames are shown in the “T” region, and the vertical arrow indicates the site where the ribosomes shift into the −2 frame (see below). Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)

Figure 2 Number of Frameshift Candidates Found by FSFinder with and without a Coding Potential Model The “No model” open bars indicate the number of candidates found when overlapping reading frames (>60 aa for both ORFs) with a −1 slippery sequence correctly positioned is the only criterion. The “Coding Potential model” solid bars show the number of candidates found when the requirement for good coding potential is added to the criteria. No manually identified G/GT frameshift sites listed in Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1 were rejected by this criterion. Notes: 1In F-pyocin, two final candidates are both in the G/GT overlapping region. Two slippery sequences are present. 2In PV83, three of the final candidates are likely to be false because they appear to arise from sequence errors (two in the portal gene and one in the integrase gene). Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)

Figure 3 Evidence for “G/GT” Frameshifting in Diverse Phages (A) The regions corresponding to the λ-G/GT region from phages L5, φC31, Mu, TM4, and HK97 were cloned into a T7 promoter vector that has a T7 tag epitope tag, so that the N terminus of gene “G” of each phage was fused to the T7 tag leader peptide in the vector. The tagged proteins were expressed in BL21(DE3) cells and visualized by Western blotting with a monoclonal antibody against the T7 tag. The label above each lane indicates from which phage the extract was derived. Each lane has a lower, heavy band corresponding to the product of gene “G” of each phage and a higher, thinner band corresponding to the frameshifted product. The bands of the unshifted and primary frameshift products are labeled. In the L5 lane, the extra prominent band right above the “G” band is produced from a UGA readthrough (see below). (B) The mobility of each band shown in (A) was plotted against the predicted molecular weight. The mobility of all bands, except for the TM4 “G” band, correlates well with the predicted molecular weight. (C) The “G/GT” region of HK022 was directly cloned into the pT7-5 vector and expressed in BL21(DE3) cells. Two bands indicated as “gpG” and “gpGT” were amino-terminally sequenced, and both have the same N-terminal sequences as predicted for the “gpG” protein (HK022 gp13, data not shown). Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)

Figure 4 Termination Codon Readthrough at the Slippery Region of Phage L5 (A) A map of the construct used to test for UGA readthrough. Rectangles represent segments of sequence, and the positions of termination codons are indicated by asterisks. The L5 “T*” segment is in the −1 frame relative to the others and connected to the L5 “G” by the −1 slippery sequence at the position shown by the vertical arrow. Predicted protein products are shown below. (B) Western blots with the indicated antibodies against the products of expression of the construct shown in (A). Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)

Figure 5 Using Mass Spectrometry to Determine the Frameshift Sites in HK97 and Mu (A) Mass spectrum of HK97 “gpGT.” The deconvoluted mass of 26,612 is only 1.1 mass units less than predicted for the expected frameshift site and within the error range of the spectrometer (1 unit/10 kd). (B) Average masses of all possible −1 frameshift products from the overlap region of the “G” and “T” ORFs. (C) Overlap region of the HK97 “G” and “T” frames showing the frameshift site. Because the second codon at the slippery site specifies Lys in both reading frames, the data cannot distinguish between the Lysyl-tRNALys entering the ribosome before (K→V) or after (E→K) the shift. (D) Mass spectrum of Mu “gpGT.” The deconvoluted mass is 22,224.7, only 0.24 units more than predicted for a R→E −2 frameshift. (E) Average masses of all possible Mu “gpGT” −2 frameshift products. Predicted masses of products of +1 frameshifts (not shown) are all more than 70 mass units lower than the measured mass. (F) Overlapping region of Mu “G” and Mu “T” frames showing the −2 frameshift site. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)

Figure 6 Conservation and Possible Mechanism for the −2 Frameshift in Phage Mu (A) Nucleotide sequence alignment of three Mu-related phages based on an alignment of their “gpG” proteins (not shown) reveals a 9 base pair conserved sequence at the −2 frameshift site. In all three phages (group 6 in Table 1 and Supplemental Table S1), the −2/+1 frame will fill most of the gap between the end of “G” to the beginning of “H,” as illustrated for Mu in Figure 1C. (B) Basepairing possibilities at the Mu −2 slippery sequence. The lower line shows the mRNA sequence at the slippery site, with tick marks indicating codon boundaries in the incoming (0) frame. Shown above the mRNA sequence are the anticodon sequences for the Gly (CCC) and Arg (3′-GCI) tRNAs presumed to be in the P and A sites of the ribosome at the time of the shift. Vertical lines indicate base pairs between tRNA and mRNA at the three relative positions. Molecular Cell 2004 16, 11-21DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006)