Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Moneer Aljawad, Abdulrahman Alshodokhi, Jericho Alves, Daniel Chief, Benjamin Kurtz, Travis Moore September 16, 2013.
NuScales Passive Safety Approach Update September 2011 Contact Information: Bruce Landrey Chief Marketing Officer Dr. Jose N.
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety “September 11th.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
ANS RESPONSE TO FUKUSHIMA LESSONS LEARNED Presented to: NESCC November 29, 2012 Washington D.C. Donald J. Spellman, Chair ANS Standards Board American.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
The Harnessed Atom Lesson Eight Concerns. What concerns do people have about nuclear power plants: Safety at nuclear power plants – Design features –
RADM Ali S. Khan, MD, MPH Director, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness.
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
JAPAN CASE STUDIES. POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION: AGEING POPULATION.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP January 25, 2012 Green Power for a Digital World Presented by: Natalie Wood and Marvin Fertel.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team 07: Belsheim Joshua Francis Travis He Jiayang Moehling Anthony Ziemkowski Micah 1.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.
Imagine if You Received this Call! Michael Weber Deputy Executive Director for Operations August 24, 2011.
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Generation In The United States. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors.
RADCON Response to a Fuel Handling Accident HPT
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E Reister CE Presentation 1/98 1 Program Elements and Related Activities Rich Reister U.S. Department.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Chasey M. Reed-Boston, MA, PhD Student APHA Member APHA Public Health Ethics Sub-Committee Member ASPH and CDC Joint Project Subject Matter Expert Participant.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
FLEX Mitigation Strategies Overview (Rec 4.2) Fukushima Regulatory Response Workshop April 5, 2012.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY MEHB513 SEM 2,2014/2015 GROUP PROJECT : EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
Nuclear Power Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, NY.
Nuclear Power.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities
THAILAND Training and Tutoring Feedback
Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation NRC Order EA
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR DISASTER Organizational accident analysis
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Regulatory Control Training Workshop
Nuclear Power.
REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL FROM THE SAN DIEGO REGION
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
Fukushima Overview.
NRC Update Nader Mamish, Director Emergency Preparedness Directorate
Emergency Preparedness
Preparing for a Terrorist Attack Indian Point Energy Center
CRCPD Update Presented to the National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference May 2004.
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Safeguards at Post-Accident Facilities
Presentation transcript:

Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 5, 2011 Thank you for joining us for this briefing. NEI in conjunction with our member companies have been striving to provide timely information that is as accurate as possible during the Japanese nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi. We have received information from Tokyo Electric Power Company (the owner of the affected units), the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum which is our sister agency in Japan, the Japan Electric Association, the US Department of Energy and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission along with other companies and organizations. In addition, the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations which is an internal industry oversight organization through the World Association of Nuclear Operators, has been working to obtain specific technical information and lessons learned from the Fukushima site to ensure the U.S. nuclear plants will have access to the information from the events and can develop lessons learned as quickly as possible. We cannot say enough about the courage and determination of the personnel working at the Fukushima Daiichi site. They may not know the status of their homes and families after the devastation caused by the earthquake and tsunami, but remain focused on their jobs to protect the health and safety of the public. Our thoughts and prayers are with them and all of the people of Japan affected by these events. Our industry is helping with technical support, supplies and equipment as requested by the Japanese.

Nuclear Energy in Japan 54 operating nuclear reactors (49 gigawatts) Two nuclear plants under construction Tokyo Electric Power Co. produces 27% of Japan’s electricity 12,000 MW of nuclear energy capacity shut down

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Before the Accident Units 5, 6 Unit 1 Unit 2 6 Units 1-4 on the left, 5 and 6 on the right in the northeast corner of the slide. All boiling water reactors. Units 1-3 were operating and units 4-6 were already shut-down for maintenance and refueling outages. Unit 3 Unit 4 At the time of the earthquake Reactors 1, 2 and 3 operating Reactors 4, 5 and 6 shutdown for maintenance, inspection, refueling

Boiling Water Reactor Design & Fukushima Daiichi Status At Fukushima Daiichi Secondary Containment Spent Fuel Pool Steel Containment Vessel Reactor Vessel Primary Containment BWR design used for all of the plants at Fukushima Daiichi site. Primary containment – where the reactor is located, pressure vessel, release pressure through controlled venting and circulate water to cool the fuel Secondary containment – not a pressure vessel (has blow-out panels to direct impact away from the primary containment), houses the spent fuel pool Suppression Pool (Torus)

U.S. Nuclear Plants Are Safe “Our nuclear power plants have undergone exhaustive study, and have been declared safe for any number of extreme contingencies. ” President Barack Obama March 17, 2011 “All the plants in the United States are designed to deal with a wide range of natural disasters, whether it’s earthquakes, tornados, tsunamis, other seismic events. We require all of them to deal with those.” NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko

Radiological Safety in the U.S. “EPA has stepped up monitoring of precipitation, milk and drinking water…..the levels detected have been far below public-health concern.” EPA statement, April 4, 2011 “At this time, CDC does not recommend that people in the United States take KI or iodine supplements in response to the nuclear power plant explosions in Japan” Center for Disease Control website, April 5, 2011 “Therefore, based on current data, we feel confident that there is no reason for concern in the United States regarding radioactive releases from Japan.” NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, March 30, 2011

Emergency Planning for U.S. Nuclear Energy Facilities 10-mile emergency planning zone (evacuation or sheltering); 50-mile monitoring zone for environment and food. Radiation monitoring by plant site, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and state and local personnel from the site and surrounding areas Decisions on public precautionary measures made by state or local authorities based on recommendations from plant operator and NRC Emergency plan exercises in coordination with state, local, and federal officials, evaluated by the NRC and FEMA

U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Prepared for Extreme Events Maximum credible earthquakes and floods Loss of off-site power and on-site power Hydrogen generation as a result of fuel damage during loss-of-coolant accidents Post 9/11: aircraft impact, loss of large areas of the plant Industry preparation, training, etc. exceed NRC requirements U.S. industry has long history of continuous learning

U.S. Government Response Multi-agency task force (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, Department of Defense) supporting Japan recovery efforts President Obama directed the NRC to perform a comprehensive review of U.S. reactors NRC established agency task force to develop lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi accident to provide short-term and long-term analysis of the events Voluntary initiative led by INPO We support President’s call for comprehensive review and we will take action as the lessons learned dictate Continuous learning from events

U.S. Industry Taking Steps to Ensure Safety at Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear energy industry will take short-term and long-term actions Short-term: Verify readiness to manage extreme events Long-term: Careful analysis of Japanese accident and how reactors, systems, structures, components, fuel and operators performed Incorporate lessons learned into U.S. reactor designs and operating practices

Short-Term Industry Actions to Ensure Safety Verify each plant's capability to manage major challenges, such as aircraft impacts, loss of large areas of plant due to natural events, fires or explosions Verify each plant's capability to manage loss of off-site power Verify capability to mitigate flooding and the impact of floods on systems inside and outside the plant Perform walk-downs and inspection of important equipment needed to respond to extreme events Voluntary initiative led by INPO We support President’s call for comprehensive review and we will take action as the lessons learned dictate Continuous learning from events

Information Sources Nuclear Energy Institute (www.nei.org) U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (www.nrc.gov) U.S. Department of Energy (www.energy.gov) International Atomic Energy Agency (www.iaea.org) American Nuclear Society (www.ans.org) Health Physics Society (www.hps.org) Japanese Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/) Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (www.jaif.or.jp/english/) Tokyo Electric Power Company (http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/index-e.html)