Faculty In-Service Week

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Advertisements

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
ETS Level 1 Reading Proficiency of Our Students
Measuring the impact on student engagement in the redesigned Blended Course using Quality Matters standards. Bill Knapp, Dean of Learning Technologies.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Dissertation Findings
Student Engagement at Orange Coast College
NSSE Results for Faculty
The University of Texas-Pan American
The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)
Director, Institutional Research
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
In spring 2009 Casper College students completed the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). Faculty at Casper College also completed the.
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Welcome Back! Spring 2014 Welcome back everyone – hope you had good holidays and are ready to tackle the spring semester. I have a very short presentation.
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
2013 NSSE Results.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Faculty In-Service Week CCSSE/CCFFSSE 2005 -2014 Faculty In-Service Week August 13, 2014

Benchmark Components – Active and Collaborative Learning Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community based project as part of a regular course Discussed ideas from readings or classes with other outside of class

Benchmark Components – Student Effort Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in Worked on a paper or project requiring the integration of ideas or information from various sources Coming to class without completing assignments Number of books read on own Preparing for class Frequency of use of peer tutoring Frequency of us of skills labs Frequency of use of computer labs

Benchmark Components – Academic Challenge Worked harder than thought possible to meet instructor’s standards or expectations Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Synthesizing & organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Making judgment about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Using information read or heard to perform a new skill Number of assigned textbooks, manuals, books, or book-length packs of course assigned Number of written paper or reports of any length Extent to which exams during the current school year challenged the student to do their best work at the college Encouragement to spend significant amounts of time studying

Benchmark Components – Student-Faculty Interaction Used email to communicate with instructor Discussed grades or assignments with instructor Talked about careers plans with an instructor or advisor Discussed ideas from readings or classes with instructors outside of class Receiving prompt feedback (oral or written) on performance Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework

Benchmark Components – Support for Learners Providing the support needed to help succeed at the college Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, or racial backgrounds Helping cope with non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc) Providing support necessary to thrive socially Providing financial support needed to afford an education Frequency of use of academic advising/planning Frequency of use of career counseling

Benchmark Score Comparison – 2011 and 2014

City Colleges of Chicago Consortium

CCSSE Differences

CCSSE and CCFSSE Consider context of responses: Faculty were able to respond “Don’t Know” on several questions where students did not have the same option Students responded to questions based on their total academic experience for the year while faculty were asked to consider their experiences within the course section(s) that were surveyed Results are based on self-reported data…