Curriculum Committee Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Linfield College Accreditation Overview Steering Committee Meeting August 22, 2006.
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Accreditation Update, General Education, and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost for Assessment and Community.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
2014 Teachers Award and the classroom
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Faculty Forum on Critical Thinking
Curriculum and Accreditation
WASC Self Study: A First Look
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Accreditation and curriculum
ISER Committee Presentations
University Community Briefing
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
Student Learning Outcomes: Institution to Course
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Opportunities to Enhance Quality at EKU
Assessment and Improvement
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Committee Report Faculty Senate 10/2/2017

Proposed New Climatology Major Description: Climatology is the study of the meteorological state of the atmosphere as it exists over specified periods of time. This program of study of climatology examines physical processes involved in climate and climate change, leading to a B.S. degree. Measurement and analysis of the processes and their effects on the climate are also stressed. (from Form 2A, section 2.3.a)

Requirements Overview of Requirements (see document, “Proposed Climatology major”) Four Year Plan (see document, “Summary of student and faculty course schedules for Climatology Major Fall 2017”) Additional Information (see Form 2A)

ESLO Updates

Purposes Guide planning Inform general education planning Benchmark for evaluating curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular activities Accreditation requirement (Middle States/Dept. of Education) Important to remain eligible for federal funds

Middle States’ accreditation is an expression of confidence in an institution’s mission and goals, its performance, and its resources. Based upon the results of institutional review by peers and colleagues assigned by the Commission, accreditation attests to the judgment of the Commission on Higher Education that an institution has met the following criteria: that it has a mission appropriate to higher education; that it is guided by well-defined and appropriate goals, including goals for student learning; that it has established conditions and procedures under which its mission and goals can be realized; that it assesses both institutional effectiveness and student learning outcomes, and uses the results for improvement; that it is accomplishing its mission and goals substantially; that it is organized, staffed, and supported so that it can be expected to continue to accomplish its mission and goals; and that it meets the Requirements of Affiliation and accreditation standards of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Source: MSCHE. 2006. Characteristics of Excellence in Higher Education: Requirements of Affiliation and Standards for Accreditation, p. iv. Philadelphia, PA: Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

Is the Institution Ready to Apply for Middle States Accreditation? Even if an institution meets the requirements of affiliation for Commission accreditation as specified above, the institution may not be ready to apply for accreditation at this time. The institution is ready to apply when it meets the following criteria: The institution shares Commission members’ commitments to quality assurance; continuous improvement; collegiality and peer review; and stability in resources, governance, and leadership. The institution already meets most of the accreditation standards described in the Commission’s Characteristics of Excellence, including the following components of the standards: an active, autonomous governing body (Standard 4) a written strategic plan (Standard 7) a substantial general education or liberal arts component in its undergraduate programs (Standard 12) documented, organized, and sustained processes to assess the achievement of key goals, including student learning goals (Standards 7 and 14) The institutional community can demonstrate the capacity to address any shortcomings and bring the institution into compliance with all remaining accreditation standards in no more than three years. The information required in the Accreditation Readiness Report submitted with the institution's initial application and updated throughout the initial accreditation process, is readily and routinely available. The institution has the resources of time and funds required by the accreditation process. Source: Becoming Accredited: Handbook for Applicants & Candidates for Accreditation (p.5). Philadelphia, PA: Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

Proposed Essential Student Learning Outcomes (ESLOs) SUNY Oneonta undergraduates will be able to demonstrate: 1. Awareness of global connectedness, diverse human cultures, and principles of inclusivity. 2. Scientific and quantitative reasoning. 3. Oral and written communication skills. 4. Technological and information literacy. 5. Critical and creative thinking. 6. Personal and social responsibility.

Proposed Essential Student Learning Outcomes (ESLOs) SUNY Oneonta undergraduates will be able to demonstrate: Curriculum Committee Endorsed (current version) Gen. Ed. Endorsed (earlier version) 1. Awareness of global connectedness, diverse human cultures, and principles of inclusivity. 1. Knowledge of the diversity of human cultures, awareness of global connectedness and principles of inclusivity. 2. Scientific and quantitative reasoning. 3. Oral and written communication skills. 3. Effective oral and written communication skills. 4. Technological and information literacy. 5. Critical and creative thinking. 6. Personal and social responsibility.

Additional Info: ESLOs See ESLO report about: Background Rationale/intent Useful comparisons Assessment Considerations Curricular Co-curricular