Our HMIe Inspection Journey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Background / Policy Context For Scotlands children examined childrens services across Scotland. Identified need to ensure that agencies work together.
Head teacher Performance Management
Performance management guidance
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
Performance management guidance
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Mrs. Bland’s Infant and Nursery School Mrs Bland’s Infant and Nursery School.
General Briefing Thurrock’s JOINT AREA REVIEW (JAR) General Briefing Thurrock’s JOINT AREA REVIEW (JAR)
ESIF Technical Compliance Requirements May 2015 WORKSHOP Helen Joicey.
STANDARDS, QUALITY AND IMPROVEMENT PLANNING in a Pre 5 Centre April 2014 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from September 2012.
Preparing for Inspection Nov 2013 Primary QIO team.
SEN and Disability Reform Partner Supplier briefing event December 2012.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Changes to School Inspection Procedures Colin Nicol, Quality Improvement Officer Maxine Cottiss, Quality Improvement Officer Education Service.
THE ADVISORY AND SCRUTINY PANEL (ASP) Jean Robinson Chair person, ASP Mark Armstrong Head of Policy & Strategy, WPH.
FE Staff Governors Conference Characteristics of effective governance Vivien Shipley HMI 3 December 2009.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
School Governors in England Dr Paul Cammack December 2015.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
Provision Mapping to Support School Improvement Advisers Learning Support Learning and Improvement Service September 2011.
Introduction to Quality Assurance Standards Date May 2012.
This is a front cover page and can only be used at the beginning of a PowerPoint presentation once. Do not add anything else to this screen if it is being.
Schools as Organisations
CORC Best Practice Framework: Self-Assessment & Accreditation Tool
Raising standards, improving lives
March 2015 Mark Nesden Service Manager 0-25 Disability Service
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Self Evaluation in Partnership
Well Trained International
The inspection of local areas effectiveness in identifying and meeting the needs of children and young people who have special educational needs and/or.
AELP Dissemination of Chief Inspectors Report 29th November 2011
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
East Dunbartonshire CLD Plan
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
School Development Planning
What Governors need to know about Ofsted
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
Vicky Blomfield, Msc Health Service
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Leading Teaching and Learning through School Self-Evaluation
Improving the system from our classrooms up
Pleased to be sharing the next step in the implementation of the 2020 Workforce Vision with you today The Implementation Plan has been developed.
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Children and Young People’s Trust Partnership
Central Training Group - background
Linking assurance and enhancement
SEND LOCAL AREA INSPECTION
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
NATSPEC Governor Seminars 2009
Katherine Smithson Policy and public affairs officer
Regulation 4 - Elements of the Plan
Chief Inspectors Report & ‘Looking at our Schools’
Lifelong Learning Planning for Improvement 1st November 2017
Early Years and Childcare Aspiring Leadership Programme
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
What Governors need to know about Ofsted
Strategy
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Implementing your school improvement plan
Strategy April 2018 – March 2022.
Gillian o’Rourke & Isla Finlayson Qieos-early years
Presentation transcript:

Our HMIe Inspection Journey December 2016 – January 2017

How CLD is delivered in our area Our CLD Plan: www.cldplanning.com Locally the delivery of the Strategic Guidance and Regulations is progressed on behalf of Community Planning West Dunbartonshire (CPWD) through three key partnership models: Adult Learning Partnership Youth Alliance Your Community The partnerships sit within CPWD arrangements, reporting through the Delivery & Improvement Groups which underpin the partnership and the Single Outcome Agreement. Key Partners from these partnerships/models of delivery were involved at every stage of the process including the initial meeting with the lead inspector. The challenge of the initial meeting was ensuring it was the appropriate people round the table with a limit on the numbers at the inspectors request.

How prepared were we? HAZELS INPUT: Self evaluation is embedded in our practice. Strong focus on improving service following last inspection (2010). Priority to improve on 1.1 and5.10. Developed systems and processes to improve service. Staff training has been focused on the new QI’s, embedding Policy in practice, planning in partnership (outcome focussed). Staff systematically gather evidence and save to a project evidence folder. Partners supported to develop 3 yr plans including the performance and quality assurance of plan. Conducted mock inspection work annually as part of self evaluation to check our readiness and to monitor and improve our services. Created PROJECT FOLDERS TO Gather evidence:   Evidence folders for Key pieces of work should provide robust evidence illustrating the quality of the work and should include these documents (which are identified within workers IWP).   Plan: Explaining the Difference Logic Model or Weavers Triangle Implementation plan with roles/responsibilities & timescales (if appropriate) Reports Case studies/personal statements Stats (for project) Evaluation results (for project, including What’s Changed for You reports) These folders should only have most recent copies and not previous drafts of any paperwork!

The journey Notification Initial meeting with inspector Inspection Paperwork Strategic Inspection Place Based Inspection Challenges Surprises Notification: Initial notification to Senior staff to develop a plan of action, this was then cascaded to operational staff and partners. Felt this approach could minimise any stress/panic reactions. Better organised. Initial meeting with inspector - Limit and choose the key staff for the initial meeting with the inspector. Inspection paperwork – planning meetings with structured action log with clear work allocation – who, where, when etc ….. Strategic Inspection - Restructure resulting joining up with other services and departure of key CLD staff. Senior Management team is a mix of CLD, Employability and financial Inclusion backgrounds but with a wealth of experience in strategy and audit processes. Place based inspection - the choice of preferred place was discussed from the outset following notification, ensuring we had rationale for this and the evidence to back it up. Having a good base and working relationships with the partners in the area , and people who know the area and its demographics extremely well helped. Keep asking if they have all the evidence they need! Challenges: Notice period for place based included 4 public holidays over the Christmas period and most activity groups off for holiday period – additional few days given to provide place based inspection documents but no extension to notice period. This had slight impact on timetabling. Surprises: Guidance advises that MI will chair initial meetings of both inspections but this wasn’t quite what happened in our place based inspection when it was passed over to our manager. Discussion also covered some areas previously discussed.

The evidence Action Log Focus Groups Briefing Notes Gather the evidence Indexing Action log: created a structure of identifying what was needed , when and person responsible. Weekly meetings involving key staff to review. Focus Groups: One person responsible for emailing invites and collating responses. Briefing Notes: briefing note required for Inspector but for Strategic inspection focus groups we created a simple to understand participant brief to prepare them. Gathering the evidence: For the strategic based inspection it was important that we had up to date evidence to substantiate any claims made. For focus groups in both parts of the inspection, the lead person collated the evidence and updated the briefing note. All evidence was then saved to a central folder. Indexing: An evidence log was created for both parts of the inspection process. Once all the evidence was collated in the appropriate folders, it was indexed and added to the log. For the strategic inspection, each statement made in the self evaluation was copied onto the evidence log under the corresponding heading , linked to QI and indexed, ie file ref 1 with the evidence sub-indexed, ie 1.1, 1.2. The focus groups on the timetable and corresponding evidence was indexed, ie focus group number 1 with the evidence sub-indexed, ie 1.1, 1.2. Inspection evidence required by inspectors on initial day of visit was also added to this evidence log. When complete, all the evidence was then copied into a central folder and saved onto a pen drive along with a copy of the evidence log for each of the inspection team.

Action Log

Strategic Inspection Evidence Log – Self Evaluation Statements

Strategic Inspection Evidence Log – Focus Groups

Strategic Inspection – Briefing Note evidence list

Strategic Inspection - Focus Group Participant Brief

Place Based Inspection Evidence Log – documents

Place Based Inspection Timetable – numbered for evidence index

Place Based Inspection Evidence log – Focus Groups

The Results! Lessons Learned? Report published 14th March 2017 Improvements in performance good Impact on the local community Delivering the learning offer with learners very good Leadership and direction Report published 14th March 2017 https://education.gov.scot/other-sectors/community-learning-and-development/688100 Lessons Learned? Now that we have received the published report, we can review the process and look at lessons learned and any required improvements. But given the learning achieved already by going through the process, I think we can look forward to future Inspections with significantly increased confidence

Ultimately if you ensure that your practice follows the CLD competencies guidance and you self evaluate using HGIOL&DIC then you are ¾ of the way there. The rest is just pulling it all together in the format laid out in the most recent inspection guidance briefing.

Any questions?