Variance components and Non-sphericity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hierarchical Models and
Advertisements

The SPM MfD course 12th Dec 2007 Elvina Chu
Basis Functions. What’s a basis ? Can be used to describe any point in space. e.g. the common Euclidian basis (x, y, z) forms a basis according to which.
2nd level analysis in fMRI
2nd level analysis – design matrix, contrasts and inference
General Linear Model L ύ cia Garrido and Marieke Schölvinck ICN.
General Linear Model Beatriz Calvo Davina Bristow.
Group analysis Kherif Ferath Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, Oct 2010.
Variance Component Estimation a.k.a. Non-Sphericity Correction.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics November 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Covariance, autocorrelation & non-sphericity Methods for Dummies.
The General Linear Model (GLM) Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics November 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social & Neural.
Group analyses Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Will Penny.
The General Linear Model (GLM)
The General Linear Model (GLM) SPM Course 2010 University of Zurich, February 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social & Neural Systems Research.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 28 April 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
1st level analysis: basis functions and correlated regressors
Parametric modulation, temporal basis functions and correlated regressors Mkael Symmonds Antoinette Nicolle Methods for Dummies 21 st January 2008.
1st Level Analysis Design Matrix, Contrasts & Inference
Estimating the delay of the fMRI response C.H. Liao 1, K.J. Worsley 12, J-B. Poline 3, G.H. Duncan 4, A.C. Evans 2 1 Department of Mathematics.
With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, Virginia Flanagin and Klaas Enno Stephan Dr. Frederike Petzschner Translational Neuromodeling.
Contrasts (a revision of t and F contrasts by a very dummyish Martha) & Basis Functions (by a much less dummyish Iroise!)
7/16/2014Wednesday Yingying Wang
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis November 2012 With many thanks for slides & images to: FIL Methods group, particularly.
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Introduction to connectivity: Psychophysiological Interactions Roland Benoit MfD 2007/8.
The General Linear Model (for dummies…) Carmen Tur and Ashwani Jha 2009.
Event-related fMRI SPM course May 2015 Helen Barron Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 12 Queen Square.
FMRI Modelling & Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Chicago, Oct.
Idiot's guide to... General Linear Model & fMRI Elliot Freeman, ICN. fMRI model, Linear Time Series, Design Matrices, Parameter estimation,
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
Variance components Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience Institute of Neurology, UCL, London Stefan Kiebel.
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips SPM Short Course London, May 2013.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Covariance components II autocorrelation & nonsphericity
Study design & EFFICIENCY
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
The General Linear Model (GLM)
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
The General Linear Model
2nd Level Analysis Methods for Dummies 2010/11 - 2nd Feb 2011
The General Linear Model (GLM): the marriage between linear systems and stats FFA.
Random Effects Analysis
The SPM MfD course 12th Dec 2007 Elvina Chu
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Experimental Design in Functional Neuroimaging
The General Linear Model
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Experimental Design Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
The General Linear Model
Hierarchical Models and
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
MfD 04/12/18 Alice Accorroni – Elena Amoruso
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Linear Hierarchical Models
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model (GLM)
WellcomeTrust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
(y - µ) t = σ/sqrt(n) ^ ∑(yi - µ)2 σ2 = ^ Variance: n - 1 ∑ yi2 σ2 = ^
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
Topic 11: Matrix Approach to Linear Regression
Presentation transcript:

Variance components and Non-sphericity Su Watkins Bahador Bahrami 13 April 2005

Outline What is the sphericity assumption? Why could it be a problem? What could we do to understand it better? How do we measure sphericity? How could we get rid of the problem? Temporal Smoothing Satterthwaite approximation (Greenhouse-Geisser) ReML

Sphericity assumption Remember the simplest case in GLM: Y = X × β + ε Y1 Y2 Y3 … Yk X1 X2 X3 … Xk ε 1 ε 2 ε 3 … ε k = × β + The question was: Is β significantly different from 0 ? t = β / ε

Sphericity assumption Next more complex step GLM is: Y = X1 × β1 + X2 × β2 + ε Y1 Y2 … Yk X11 X12 X21 X22 … Xk1 Xk2 ε 1 ε 2 ε k β1 β2 t = (β1 – β2) / ε = × + The new question is: How valid is our estimate of error?

Sphericity assumption Measurement error (a.k.a. variance) is Identical AND Independent across all levels of measurement But what do Identical and Independent mean?

But why do we care? An example from Will Penny

Example I U. Noppeney et al. Stimuli: Auditory Presentation (SOA = 4 secs) of (i) words (e.g. book) (ii) words spoken backwards (e.g. koob) Subjects: (i) 12 control subjects (ii) 11 blind subjects Scanning: fMRI, 250 scans per subject, block design Q. What are the regions that activate for real words relative to reverse words in both blind and control groups? http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/course/slides03/ppt/hier.ppt

Non-Identical (but independent) Error BOLD ε 1 ε 2 book koob book koob Blind Control Non-Identical (but independent) Error e1 e2

Error can be Independent but Non-Identical when… 1) One parameter but from different groups e.g. patients and control groups 2) One parameter but design matrices differ across subjects e.g. subsequent memory effect e1 e2

Error can be Non-Independent AND Non-Identical when… Several parameters per subject e.g. Repeated Measurement design Conjunction over several parameters e.g. Common brain activity for different cognitive processes Complete characterization of the hemodynamic response e.g. F-test combining HRF, temporal derivative and dispersion regressors

How do we measure sphericity? Covariance Matrix Sphericity Non- Sphericity 0.3 3.0 5.9 45 2.7 9.43 88 5.6 34 0.04 5.0 0.32 10 1 2.12 σ2

Box’s measure (ε) measures the departure of Cov(εk) from spherical Sphericity Non- Sphericity c σ2 ε = 1 ε = 1/(k-1)