Flow Swap Scenarios – Agreed Logic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Advertisements

NTS Exit Capacity - Amending the DN Adjustment Window Transmission Workstream, 1 April 2010.
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
The Entry Capacity Transfer & Trade Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Force Majeure - Capacity Transmission Workstream 2 July 2009.
Implementation of Trades and Transfers National Grid NTS 5 th June 2008.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update Transmission Workstream, 1 Dec Nov 05.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
Transmission Workstream 6 January 2011
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
SGN Modification Proposal Amendments to UNC TPD OCS Process Long Term Allocation of Capacity for the Transitional Period.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Entry Capacity Overrun price calculation
Offtake Workstream : 8th September 2010
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
Transmission Workstream, 6 August
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
Transmission Workgroup – 1st December 2011
LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
How to improve production efficiency
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime - draft MOD principles
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 26 February 2009
2 hour / 5% Rule Bethan Winter.
DNPC06 From 1 October 2012 the DNs will pay the NTS Exit Capacity charges to the NTS and recover the cost from shippers DNPC06 put forward for consultation.
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
MOD Flow Swap Scenario’s – Initial Thoughts
Publication of Zonal Flex Data
Transmission Workgroup June 7th 2012
COR1360 NTS Exit Reform (Mod 0195AV) UK-Link Committee 11th June 2009
Background to National Grid’s Baseline analysis
Enduring Offtake Arrangements (Including an alternative daily interruptible capacity release mechanism to facilitate use of spare capacity) Peter Bolitho.
Update on Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
MOD National Grid NTS Initiated Flow Swaps
DN OAD Processes: RG 0316 : Offtake Workstream
Simon Trivella –5th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
Modification 501 slides for Workgroup
Action NTS0504: - Provide comparative demand data over a sample number of years NTS Charging Methodology Forum (NTSCMF) 23rd June 2014.
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
MOD Deemed applications – User pays initial thoughts.
Interruptible to Firm – NTS Supply Point Transition
Transmission Workstream – Partial Assignment
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Richard Fairholme E.ON UK
UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005
Entry Overrun Calculation
Measurement Error Notification Guidelines for NTS to LDZ and LDZ to LDZ Measurement Installations Review 2014.
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
195AV “Future work” – system flexibility
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity – Work currently being Undertaken
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime
Entry Capacity Transfers - Constrained Period
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Off-peak interruptible service to compliment universal firm/buy-back regime Peter Bolitho.
MOD Flow Swap Scenario’s – Initial Thoughts
Presentation transcript:

Flow Swap Scenarios – Agreed Logic August 23rd 2011

Background The Review Group 0316 report concluded that: “National Grid NTS raised Modification 0365 (National Grid NTS Initiated Flow Swaps) to clarify the UNC with respect to flow swaps. However, it was not clear that this modification is necessary and a set of scenarios was developed with a view to clarifying the application of the UNC under a range of circumstances involving flow swaps. These scenarios have not yet been agreed by the DNs and National Grid NTS. Once final, agreed, scenarios have been established, they will be published alongside this Report”

Background cntd The logic and scenarios referred to within the review group report have now been finalised and agreed between National Grid NTS and the DNs. Agreement has been reached by the review group that this logic is consistent with the UNC rules and as such will be utilised by National Grid NTS to calculate the NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun Quantity when a flow swap has occurred. UNC Modification 0365 – “National Grid NTS initiated flow swaps” has now been withdrawn as a result of this agreement. The logic, principles and scenarios agreed to are included within this slide pack and to be published alongside the 0316 Review Group Report for reference.

Key Drivers for Flow Swap Scenarios The key principles driving the logic for an NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (via a NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity transfer(s)) as a result of a flow swap - The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun quantity at the specific NTS/LDZ Offtakes will not increase as a result of any NTS (Exit) Flat Capacity Transfer between these specific NTS/LDZ Offtakes. The aggregate NTS (Exit) Flat Capacity position across these specific NTS/LDZ Offtakes remains unchanged. The NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity transfer quantity must be consistent with the agreed flow swap quantities for the specific NTS/LDZ Offtakes. The Capacity transfer quantity from the decreasing to the increasing NTS/LDZ offtake(s) will be the minimum of three values (kWh/day): Agreed Flow Swap Quantity The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun Quantity at the increasing NTS/LDZ offtakes The NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity held at the decreasing NTS/LDZ offtake minus the actual quantity of gas offtaken by the DNO User at the decreasing NTS/LDZ Offtake for the relevant Gas Day (or zero, which ever is greater) These 3 values (A,B,C) are used as the headings to demonstrate the NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment in the scenarios that follow.

Flow Swap Scenario 1 The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below Agreed Flow Swap Quantity The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun Quantity at the increasing NTS/LDZ offtake The NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity held at the decreasing NTS/LDZ offtake minus the actual Quantity of gas offtaken by the DNO User at the decreasing NTS/LDZ Offtake for the relevant Gas Day (or zero, which ever is greater)

Flow Swap Scenario 2 – Overrun at decreasing offtake The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ Offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below No NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity transfer from the decreasing NTS/LDZ offtake as this would increase the Overrun quantity at the decreasing offtake

Flow Swap Scenario 3 The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ Offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below

Flow Swap Scenario 4 The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ Offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below

Flow Swap Scenario 5 The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ Offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below

Scenario 6 for multiple flow swaps Offtake y is involved in two separate flow swaps on the same gas day * No NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity transfer from the decreasing NTS/LDZ offtake for flow swap quantity 2 as this would increase the Overrun position at the decreasing Offtake. The NTS Exit (Flat) Overrun adjustment (facilitated by a capacity transfer) at the increasing NTS/LDZ Offtake will be the minimum of the 3 values in the table below The Overrun adjustment (Via a NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity Transfer) will be calculated in the order of time that each flow swap was agreed from the decreasing to the increasing NTS/LDZ offtake.

Scenario 7 - One to many Flow Swap What is a One to Many Flow Swap? For the purposes of this slide pack, a one to many flow swap is where a flow swap is agreed to resulting in flow swapped from a single decreasing offtake to multiple increase offtakes. What's different? Under certain circumstances the capacity transferred from the decreasing offtake may need to be apportioned across multiple increase offtakes. This scenario illustrates how the apportionment is carried out. Why? In the previous scenarios all flow swaps were on a one to one basis so there is no requirement to apportion the capacity transfer to multiple offtakes. How? Step 1 – determine at each increasing offtake the maximum adjustment required The min of flow swap quantity or overrun quantity at the individual offtakes (A) Step 2 – determine the max capacity transfer from the decreasing offtake which is the min of: the aggregated quantities for each increasing offtake from step 1 (B) or the spare capacity at the decreasing offtake (C) Step 3 If the quantity derived from step 2 is C then pro ration is required based on the value of A for each increasing offtake i.e. A/B * C for each increasing offtake If the quantity derived from step 2 is B then the capacity transferred to each increasing offtake is A

“One to many Flow” Swap Scenario – The table below summaries the steps and logic used when transferring spare NTS Exit (Flat) to calculate the Overrun adjustments at the increasing locations following a flow swap where the capacity needs to be apportioned across multiple locations.