Implications of the 2014 Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society guidelines on polycystic ovarian morphology for polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis  J.P. Christ, M.N. Gunning, B.C.J.M. Fauser  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 480-483 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.020 Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of Rotterdam 2003 and Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society (AEPCOS) 2014 guidelines for polycystic ovarian morphology when diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome. Group C: Rott ‘03’ is equivalent to the new Non-PCOS group referenced in Table 1. All non-shaded regions represent Group D (original non-PCOS). Comparisons are made between Groups A (n = 157); B (n = 125); C (n = 72); and D (n = 50) in Table 1. 398 women had OA, 161 had HA, 112 met Rott 2003 PCOM criteria but not AEPCOS 2014 criteria, 223 met AEPCOS 2014 PCOM criteria. PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; HA, hyperandrogenism; OA, oligio-amenorrhea; Rott, Rotterdam; PCOM, polycystic ovarian morphology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2017 35, 480-483DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.020) Copyright © 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions