Instrumentation - Results from first season and plan for 2005 A. Karle Iceube Collabration meeting Berkeley March 19, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PV String Monitoring Solution
Advertisements

LHCb VELO Production Visit November 9 th 2005 Introduction to staff Status Schedule.
Time Calibration Tests Results using a waveform template Cross-talk measurements Stub asymmetry results Kalle Sulanke David Hardtke Bob Stokstad.
10-Nov-2005US ATLAS Tracking Upgrade Santa Cruz 1.
DAM-Île de France Département Analyse, Surveillance, Environnement 06/06/2014 DIF/DASE/B.ALCOVERRO 1 INFRASOUND SENSOR CALIBRATION DEVICE 13/11/2001 Infrasound.
Melting Probe IWF-EXP/ÖAW GRAZ Size: 40 x 40 x 195 mm Mass w/o electronics Calculated: 450g Measured: 350g, 3m tether Main Components Cable.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
CMS ECAL Meeting Ecole Polytechnique June 2005 A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL End Cap CMS ECAL End Cap Trigger Meeting. Meeting held 29 th - 30 th June.
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Number bonds to 10,
MICE Target Electronics, DAQ and BPS MICE/ISIS Target Meeting 17 th September 2010 P J Smith – University of Sheffield.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
April 26, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer IceCube Spring Meeting 1 IceCube Digital Optical Module Production R. Nahnhauer DESY.
April 4, 2007 Rolf Nahnhauer1 DESY-PROJECT IceCube Digital Optical Module Production.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
IceCube System Testing
November 24, 2004 Rolf Nahnhauer1 PROJECT : IceCube Digital Optical Module Production at DESY Zeuthen.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Dec 2, 2003Tom Gaisser IceTop freeze tests Interim report from South Pole December 2, 2003.
IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: “DOM MB to Event Builder”
High Energy - Engineering Working Group IceCube PY8 Spring Collaboration Meeting Apr 29, 2009 Jim Baccus.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
Status of IceTop tank testing Tom Gaisser, Madison, Feb 20, 2003.
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Denis Kuleshov Valday, February 3, 2015.
String-18 New-DAQ Commissioning Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2002.
IceCube Data Acquisition :: Status Presentation before the IceCube Science Advisory Committee W. R. Edwards / K. Hanson for DAQ Mar 29, 2006 – Madison,
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin UW, June 3, 2010 The DM-Ice Test Detector Detector Concept Mechanical Assembly Vessel Options Logistics Considerations.
Computing in IceCube Georges Kohnen, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium for the IceCube Collaboration The IceCube neutrino telescope.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Erik Blaufuss University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
MICE Target - Risk Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
MuTr Shutdown Work Rusty Towell for And JUNE 22, 2004 at the Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop.
DAQ: Status and Plans David Nygren Berkeley Collaboration Meeting March 21, 2005.
Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS.
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Laguna Beach, CA March 2003 String-18 Progress and Plans.
DAQ Hardware status - overview R. Stokstad DOM Main Board –Schedule (Minor) –Design (Przybylski) –Firmware (Stezelberger) –Testing (Goldschmidt) DOR Board.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
IceTop DAQ: 1 David Seckel – 8/27/2003, College Park, MD IceTop DAQ David Seckel University of Delaware.
David Seckel, IceTop Baseline Review, Madison, Dec. 4, 2003 IceTop Baseline Review Dec. 4, Madison WI.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
Calibrations Accomplishments in PY03 Plans for PY04 Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 lead – Detector Characterization.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser1 IceTop IceTop station 2004 test tanks Calibration Verification 04/05 DOM operation Summary.
Muon Tracker Responsibilities This Year South arm commissioning through this year’s run Analysis Software oversight and development North Arm station 2.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
IceCube Dust Loggers Kurt Woschnagg, Ryan Bay Physics Department, UC Berkeley Instrumentation Session IceCube Collaboration Meeting Bartol, March 2004.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Physical Description of IceTop 3 Nov IceTop Internal Review Madison, November 3-4, 2010 Physical Description of IceTop Paul Evenson, University.
Testing DAQ PY04 Mark Krasberg University of Wisconsin Berkeley Collaboration Meeting 20 March, 2005.
IceRay-0 Testbed: A Radio Surface Listening Station John Kelley IceCube Collaboration Meeting April 30, 2008 UH Radio Detection Group: P. Gorham, G. Varner,
IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: Implementation Plan.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin UW, June 3, 2010 The DM-Ice Test Detector Detector Concept Mechanical Assembly Vessel Options Logistics Considerations.
Straw Working group Ferrara 4/9/2014. Outline Status and Plans Installation of Chambers 1-3 Chamber 4 Vacuum test SRB Readout, monitoring and software.
Future high energy extensions of IceCube with new technologies: Radio and/or acoustical detectors Karle.
IceCube Construction Endgame
IceCube System Testing
IceCube construction status
IceCube Deployment Monitoring System (PTS)
String-21 Flasher Analysis
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Presentation transcript:

Instrumentation - Results from first season and plan for 2005 A. Karle Iceube Collabration meeting Berkeley March 19, 2005

Major progress since Uppsala Shipped to South Pole (hardware): –280 DOMs –4 pairs of cables –8 tanks Progress at Pole: 76 DOMs deployed 76 DOMs are communicating 76 DOMs have time calibration 76 DOMs are triggering muon and shower events at 7.5 Hz

3 Potted DOMs /w/ HV base attached awaiting boardstack attach. DOMs sealed and ready for FAT in storage containers in PSL highbay. Production Pictures

Testing DOMs on the ice

DOM transport Mark Krasberg & Jim Braun

DOMs in deployment tower (TOS)

Cable for string 1 Weight: ~6t

Last optical sensor

Connecting the cable

IceTop: ice tank

DOM in tank ice

First contact

Light Flasher tests Calibration of timing and geometry. New: Study optical response function of string by comparing data before and after the freeze-in.

Noise rates after freeze-in: ~0.75 kHz

DOM clock stability (IceTop)

Timing Clock calibration: of order 2 nsecs rms (cross-over timing)

DOM DOM Hub (surface DAQ) communication: simultaneous comms on all channels Bandwidth: ~ 1 Mbit/pair on all DOMs of string. (consistent with design goal) Realistic cross-talk situation of pressurized cable. (Never achievable in lab.) Elevated error rate on one quad (2 pairs, 4 DOMs) in configboot mode (startup mode). Possible hardware defect. Currently no consequences for readout seen. However, it is critical to pass the configboot phase. Communication to DOMs Log(BER) (analysis by JJ)

Significance of this result for instrument design validation: –Cable design and production –Communications protocol –DOM and DAQ design –String deployment Risk for project has dropped substantially. Communication to DOMs

Event in run 463

Trigger Rates Run # Depth (m) See Song/Hill talk for analysis Singles rate: ~750 Hz Local coincidence rate: 15 Hz In Ice trigger rate: 6.5 Hz (8 in 2 µsecs) Combined trigger rate: ~ 7 Hz

DOM production in 2005 DOMsQuantity Installed at Pole (stored)76 (~180) UW - PSL610 DESY160 Stockholm/Uppsala160 Total to integrate:930 DOMs

DOM Production 2005 Coordination: J. Haugen

PY 4 Scope: Cables CableSurface cableSurface to DOM cable Installed at Pole41 Stored at Pole03 Stored in McMurdo11 Ship to Pole118 Ship to McMurdo (for 06/07 season) 18 To build16

XSJJ Connector Leakage Issue 9 of 30 quad pairs leaked water before freeze in. Raw connector design with these failure modes has passed testing: –Cold o-rings –Loosely tightened connectors Failures followed DOMs manufactured at PSL We have seen both of the following likely failure modes on PSL DOMs: –Scratched connector: Longitudinal scratches seen on DOM connector allow water to bypass o-ring. –Electrical tape remnants in connector: Remnants from tape used to hold cap on connector also provide path for water to bypass o-ring. Tim Murray is testing these failure modes at Sea Con this week and there are other failure modes (including breakouts) that still need to be ruled out.

9 of 30 quad pairs leaked water before freeze in. Investigation suggests: Fundamental design of connector is sound. Probably issue in handling during production and shipping. The good news: Avoided operation before freeze-in No detrimental effect to DOM or lifetime of DOM seen. DOM connectors (µA) (Quad number) 16

Cables Contract between UW and Ericsson for the production of all cables in place. Purchasing process for breakouts and terminations in progress (RfP to go out next week)

PY04 Scope: DAQ HW DAQ hardware: –DOM mainboards for 930 DOMs, design stabilized, (functionality identical, only minimal tweaks compared to last season) –DOM - DOR communications firmware (DOR Rev 1), DOM firmware –DOM Hubs sufficient for 12 strings and additional lab use –DOR Rev 1 design verification and production of 300 cards –Clock distribution system

PY04 Scope: DAQ SW DAQ software: –Reading out all DOMs at the Pole, –Current DAQ SW configuration: Using TestDAQ for reading data from DOMs (based on production testing) DAQ architecture based configuration Monolith used for triggering and eventbuilding. –Full deployment DAQ system configuration on SPTS by August 1. –Deployment ready for Pole by September.

PY04 Scope: IceTop IceTop: –Build 12 stations (24 tanks) for Pole –Build 74 tanks, 1/2 of the remaining tanks for all of IceCube –Continue DAQ specific engineering (SW, fpga, triggering) –No major issues seen.

Conclusions Enormous progress was made in all areas of instrumentation. First IceCube string successfully deployed. 8 tanks deployed. Initial operation of 76 DOMs provides basis for going ahead: –Extremely valuable data –Issues are being worked, but –No show stoppers seen –Detailed analysis on data and issues ongoing On track for next year deployment.