Barbora Gulejová 1 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 SOLPS5 simulations of ELMing H-mode Barbora Gulejová.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G. Arnoux (1/19) SEWG on transient heat loads Ljubljana, 02/10/2009 Heat load measurements on JET first wall during disruptions G. Arnoux, M. Lehnen, A.
Advertisements

EU PWI TF- 7th General meeting –Frascati /10/2008 PWI aspects of the FAST (Fusion Advanced Studies Torus) project Presented by G. Maddaluno Outline.
Report IPP Garching EU Task Force PWI Meeting, Cadarache Oct Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik compiled by Arne Kallenbach (IPP - EU-PWI.
Progress with PWI activities at UKAEA Fusion GF Counsell, A Kirk, E Delchambre, S Lisgo, M Forrest, M Price, J Dowling, F Lott, B Dudson, A Foster,
A new look at the specification of ITER plasma wall interaction and tritium retention J. Roth a, J. Davis c, R. Doerner d, A. Haasz c, A. Kallenbach a,
Alberto Loarte EU Plasma-Wall Interaction Task Force Meeting – CIEMAT – 10 – ITER Design Review Activities on Steady State and Transient Power.
Th Loarer - SEWG on Fuel retention – JET, July Th Loarer with special thanks to S Brezinsek, J Bucalossi, I Coffey, G Esser, S Gruenhagen.
1Annual meeting SEWG Transient Heat Loads, Ljubljana, 1 st /2 nd October 2009 TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-CEA J. Bucalossi Report on Tore Supra activities.
ERO modelling of local 13 C deposition at the outer divertor of JET M. Airila, L. Aho-Mantila, S. Brezinsek, P. Coad, A. Kirschner, J. Likonen, D. Matveev,
K. Krieger, SEWG Meeting on Material Migration and ITER Material Mix, JET, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Carbon local transport and redeposition.
Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.
Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen D retention in W and mixed systems in Pilot-PSI G. De Temmerman a, K. Bystrov a, L. Marot b, M. Mayer c, J.J. Zielinski.
Dynamo Effects in Laboratory Plasmas S.C. Prager University of Wisconsin October, 2003.
Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Examples of ITER CODAC requirements for diagnostics
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Reunion Scientifique 05/04/2006 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas 1 of 12 Barbora Gulejova Some key results from SOL H-mode characterisation.
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 12 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas SPS Annual Meeting in Lausanne, 14/2/2006 SOLPS5 modelling of ELMing H-mode on TCV.
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
A. Kirk, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2004 The structure of ELMS and the distribution of transient power loads in MAST Presented.
Paper O4.007, R. A. Pitts et al., 34th EPS Conference: 5 July 2007 Neoclassical and transport driven parallel SOL flows on TCV R. A. Pitts, J. Horacek.
Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas TF-E modellers meeting B. Gulejová6/5/ of 10 SOLPS5 simulations of Type I ELMing H-mode at JET Barbora.
Comparison of drift simulation with D,Chi different in div.legs.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
R. A. Pitts et al., O-161 of 12PSI17, Heifei Anhui, China, 22-26/05/2006 Parallel SOL flow in TCV R. A. Pitts, J. Horacek, W. Fundamenski 1, A. Nielsen.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 18 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas First Thesis Committee 30/1/2007 Particle sources and radiation distributions in.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 10 PSI 2008 abstract 5/12/2007 SOLPS modelling of Type I ELMing H-mode on JET Barbora Gulejová, Richard Pitts, David Coster, Xavier.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 2 EPS 2007 material 20/6/2007 Time-dependent modelling of ELMing H-mode at TCV with SOLPS Barbora Gulejová, Richard Pitts, Xavier.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
10th ITPA meeting on SOL & divertor physics, Avila, Spain, Jan 7-10, 2008 Arne Kallenbach 1/15 Prediction of wall fluxes and implications for ITER limiters.
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
H-mode characteristics close to L-H threshold power ITPA T&C and Pedestal meeting, October 09, Princeton Yves Martin 1, M.Greenwald, A.Hubbard, J.Hughes,
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
Japanese Efforts on the Integrated Modeling - Part II : JAEA Contribution - T. Takizuka (JAEA) acknowledgments : T. Ozeki, N. Hayashi, N. Aiba, K. Shimizu,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
O. Sauter Effects of plasma shaping on MHD and electron heat conductivity; impact on alpha electron heating O. Sauter for the TCV team Ecole Polytechnique.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
1 of 22A.V.Chankin & D.P.Coster, 18 th PSI Conference, Toledo, Spain, 29 May 2008 Comparison of 2D Models for the Plasma Edge with Experimental Measurements.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
N. Fedorczak O-26 PSI 2010 San Diego 1 Nicolas Fedorczak Poloidal mapping of turbulent transport in SOL plasmas. G. Bonhomme,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
R. A. Pitts et al. 1 (12) IAEA, Chengdu Oct ELM transport in the JET scrape-off layer R. A. Pitts, P. Andrew, G. Arnoux, T.Eich, W. Fundamenski,
ELM propagation in Low- and High-field-side SOLs on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga 1), N.Oyama 1), S.Takamura.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
ELM propagation and fluctuations characteristics in H- and L-mode SOL plasmas on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
1 Estimating the upper wall loading in ITER Peter Stangeby with help from J Boedo 1, D Rudikov 1, A Leonard 1 and W Fundamenski 2 DIII-D 1 JET 2 10 th.
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
2014/03/06 那珂核融合研究所 第 17 回若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 SOL-divertor plasma simulations with virtual divertor model Satoshi Togo, Tomonori Takizuka a, Makoto Nakamura.
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Reduction of ELM energy loss by pellet injection for ELM pacing
Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering
Automatic Analysis of Edge Pedestal Gradient Degradation during ELMs
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Barbora Gulejová 1 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 SOLPS5 simulations of ELMing H-mode Barbora Gulejová Richard Pitts, David Coster, Xavier Bonnin, Roland Behn, Marc Beurskens, Stefan Jachmich, Jan Horáček, Arne Kallenbach

Barbora Gulejová 2 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 OUTLINE SOLPS 5 code package ELM simulation - theory Simulation of Type III ELM at TCV Simulation of Type I ELMing H-mode at JET Code - experiment benchmark Code - code benchmark * * * * * *

Barbora Gulejová 3 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 ELMing H-mode = baseline scenario for plasma operation on ITER! Edge localised mode (ELM) Edge localised mode (ELM) H-mode Edge MHD instabilities Periodic bursts of particles and energy into the SOL ELM leaves edge pedestal region in the form of a helical filamentary structure localised in the outboard midplane region of the poloidal cross-section Danger: divertor targets and main walls erosion first wall power deposition Energy stored in ELMs: TCV 500 J JET 200kJ ITER ~ 1-10 MJ => unacceptable MOTIVATION Understanding of the ELM from formation to point of interaction with plasma facing components = Important research goal!

Barbora Gulejová 4 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 SOLPS5 modelling of ELMing H-mode Type III & Type I ELMing H-mode TCV & JET benchmark SOLPS & EDGE2D/NIMBUS 1.) 2.a) 2.b) * contribute to understanding transport in the SOL : transient events => ELMs * interpretative modeling of both 1.) steady state and 2.) transient particle and heat fluxes during ELMing H-mode employing the SOLPS5 fluid/Monte Carlo code * rigorous benchmarking = seeking the possible agreement between 1.) experiment and simulation 2.) code and different code MODEL: tool to understand and predict phenomena =>

Barbora Gulejová 5 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Scrape-Off Layer Plasma Simulation Suite of codes to simulate transport in edge plasma of tokamaks B2 B2 - solves 2D multi-species fluid equations on a grid given from magnetic equilibrium EIRENE EIRENE - kinetic transport code for neutrals based on Monte - Carlo algorithm SOLPS 5 SOLPS 5 – coupled EIRENE + B2.5 Main inputs: * magnetic equilibrium * P sol = P heat – P rad core * upstream separatrix density n e * E ELM Free parameters: cross-field transport coefficients (D,, v ) B2 plasma background => recycling fluxes EIRENE Sources and sinks due to neutrals and molecules measured systematically adjusted Mesh 72 grid cells poloidally along separatrix 24 cells radially D 0 D 1+ C 0 C 1+ C 2+ C 3+ C 4+ C 5+ C 6+

Barbora Gulejová 6 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Type III ELMing H-mode on TCV Type III ELMing H-mode on TCV ELMs - too rapid (frequency ~ 200 Hz) for comparison on an individual ELM basis => Many similar events are coherently averaged inside interval with reasonably periodic elms Time-dependent ELM simulation * starting from time-dependent pre-ELM steady state simulation * equal time-steps for kinetic and fluid parts of code, dt = s t pre ~ 2 ms t elm ~ 100 μs t post ~ 1 ms Post-ELM phasePre-ELM phase ELM = particles and heat are thrown into SOL ( elevated cross-field transport coefficients)

Barbora Gulejová 7 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Pre-ELM and ELM simulation - theory Cross-field radial transport in the main SOL - complex phenomena Ansatz:( D,, v ) – variation : * Pure diffusion: v =0 everywhere * More appropriate: Convection simulations with D = D class 2 approaches radially – transport barrier (TB) poloidally – no TB in div.legs Instantaneous increase of the cross-field transport parameters D,, v ! Simulation of ELM 1.) for ELM time – from experiment coh.averaged ELM = t ELM = s 2.) at poloidal location -> expelled from area A ELM at LFS Cross-field radial transport => approximate estimation of transport parameters during ELM corresponding to the given expelled energy W ELM, t ELM and A ELM A ELM = 1.5m 2 W = 600 J D *

Barbora Gulejová 8 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 ELM is more convective than conductive ! Δ.ne ped exceeds Δ.Te ped in the contribution to E ELM => smaller TB D TS measurements (R.Behn et al., PPCF 49 (2007)) => larger drop in n e than T e at the pedestal top => SOLPS : D increased more then during the ELM 100 times 10 times (2 times in SOL) + change of radial shape ! ETB collapse! Type III TCV ELM simulation Very good agreement ! A ELM =1.5m 2 – Gaussian function of multiplicators polloidally 1 ELM cycle of total 400 μs, * 100 μs before ELM * ELM duration = t ELM = 100μs =100 points during ELM event * 200 μs after ELM Upstream

Barbora Gulejová 9 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 SOLPS < Exp (LP) factor ~ 1.5 SOLPS >> Exp (coav LP) ( R.Pitts,Nucl.Fusion 43 (2003)) factor ~ 3 Type III TCV ELM simulation Downstream

Barbora Gulejová 10 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Type I ELMing H-mode on JET # Succesfully modelled by EDGE2D + NIMBUS by Arne Kallenbach (PPCF 46,2004) Core LIDAR Edge LIDAR Li beam ECE Parameters B t = 2 T I p = 2 MA n e = 4x10 19 m -3 P(SOL)= 12 MW GAS PUFF from inner divertor !! ELM parameters f elm ~ 30 Hz ΔW ELM ~ 200 kJ P IN ~ 14 MW P RAD (core) D alpha W dia time

Barbora Gulejová 11 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Benchmarking code-code SOLPS 5 B2.5 + EIRENE fluid (Braginskii) kinetic (Monte Carlo), neutrals EDGE2D + NIMBUS fluid (Braginskii) kinetic (Monte Carlo), neutrals (less complex then EIRENE!) vs.

Barbora Gulejová 12 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Pre-ELM model vs.experiment EDGE2D+NIMBUS SOLPS5 r-r sep [m] Same Ansatz D,Chi,v Same ne,Te,Ti upstream profiles -0.05

Barbora Gulejová 13 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Pre-ELM vs. ELM simulation EDGE2D+NIMBUS SOLPS5 ELM D x 20 Chi x 40 1ms

Barbora Gulejová 14 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Model vs. experiment-targets(LP) EDGE2D+NIMBUS LPLP outer targetinner target SOLPS5 outer target r-r sep map2mid

Barbora Gulejová 15 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Type I ELMing H-mode on JET # W dia P IN ~ 20 MW P RAD (below Xpoint) P RAD (core) D alpha Parameters B t = 3 T I p = 3 MA n e =6x10 19 m -3 P(SOL)= 19 MW No GAS PUFF !! ν* ped ~ (expected for ITER!) ELM parameters f elm ~ 2 Hz ΔW ELM ~ 1 MJ Simulated for the first time ! … with SOLPS5 Core LIDAR Edge LIDAR Li beam HRTS ECE Langmuir probes time =baseline scenario for Q DT =10 burning plasma operation on ITER !!! To avoid divertor damage => maximum ΔW ELM (ITER) ~ 1MJ (at TCV MJ !!!) = this is achievable on JET Bolometry (A.Huber) radiation between ELMs

Barbora Gulejová 16 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Core LIDAR Edge LIDAR Li beam HRTS ECE Simulation vs. experiment - upstream First results for pre-ELM * quite promising * unlike for TCV inward pinch radial profile necessary!! D = 0.01 m 2.s -1 in pedestal 1 m 2.s -1 in SOL Χ = 0.7 m 2.s -1 in pedestal 1 m 2.s -1 in SOL (TCV pedestal: D = m 2.s -1 Χ = 0.25 m 2.s -1 ) n e [m -3 ] T e [eV] v perp [m.s -1 ] inward pinch! D [m 2.s -1 ] Χ [m2.s-1]

Barbora Gulejová 17 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Simulation vs.experiment - targets Outer targetInner target SOLPS LP 80 1, r-r sep r-r sep map2mid r-r sep r-r sep map2mid Inner target – good agreement Outer target SOLPS Te too high!

Barbora Gulejová 18 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 CONCLUSIONS Type III ELMing H-mode at TCV and Type I ELMing H-mode at JET have been succesfully simulated by SOLPS5 both steady state and transient event Agreement obtained between : code - experiment code - code * * * * * *

Barbora Gulejová 19 of 19 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Swiss physical society 26/3/2008 Thank you for attention !