ASCORE : An up-to-date cardiovascular risk score for hypertensive patients reflecting. contemporary clinical practices developed. using the ASCOT trial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
Advertisements

ASCOT ASCOT STUDY. ASCOT INTRODUCTION AND AIMS EXISTING KNOWLEDGE BACKGROUND OF ASCOT STUDY DESIGN (TWO ARMS (BPLA,LLA) METHODOLOGY TREATMENT REGIMES.
11/2/ Implications of ASCOT Results for ALLHAT Conclusions ALLHAT.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
Resistant hypertension increases patients’ cardiovascular risk 30% of all treated patients develop resistant hypertension [1-5]. Resistant hypertension.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Absolute cardiovascular disease risk Assessment and Early Intervention Dr Michael Tam Lecturer in Primary Care
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
The Global Challenge Peter Sever The International Centre for Circulatory Health National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
6 / 5 / RENAL DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED INTO 3 GROUPS BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (GFR) ALLHAT.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIMARY PREVENTION CONTROL PROGRAM OF PHC PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY CLINIC AMONG PATIENTS AT RISK FOR CVD: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Utilization Of Lipid-lowering Therapy In Hypertensive Patients In The United States Simon S.K. Tang, MPH* Sean Candrilli, MS** Lizheng Shi, PhD* *Department.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Slide 1 Downloaded from Population Impact of Losartan Use on Stroke in the European Union (EU)
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
An analysis of 22,672 patients from the CLARIFY registry
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial Michael Miller MD,
The ALERT Trial.
ACCORD Design and Baseline Characteristics
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
*Imperial College London
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Cholesterol practice questions
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Hotline Session of the European Society of Cardiology Annual Congress, September 3-7, 2005 in Stockholm,
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
on behalf of the ASCOT Investigators *Imperial College London, UK
Presenter Disclosure Information
Determinants of new onset diabetes among hypertensive patients randomised in the ASCOT-BPLA Trial Dr Ajay K Gupta International Centre for Circulatory.
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
LRC-CPPT and MRFIT Content Points:
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Goals & Guidelines A summary of international guidelines for CHD
Baseline Characteristics of the Subjects*
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

ASCORE : An up-to-date cardiovascular risk score for hypertensive patients reflecting. contemporary clinical practices developed. using the ASCOT trial database . D Prieto-Merino1, AK Gupta2, J Dobson2, CL Chang2, SE Mastorantonakis2, PS Sever2, B Dahlof3, H Wedel4. S Pocock1, NR Poulter2on behalf of the ASCOT investigators 1 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 2 ICCH, Imperial College London 3 Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden 4 Nordic School of Public Health, Goteborg, Sweden

Introduction Guidelines recommend total CV risk estimation for CV patients1 Various risk assessment tools available Framingham2 QRisk2 NHANES SCORE ASSIGN PROCAM INDANA3 Need for a new score for patients with multiple CV risk factors 1Mancia G et al. J Hypertens 2007;25:1751-62 2Anderson KM et al. Am Heart J 1991;121:293-8 3Pocock SJ et al BMJ 2001;323:75-81

ASCOT Study design  160/100 mmHg untreated,  140/ 90 mmHg treated Age 40-79 years No previous MI or current clinical CHD 3 or more CV risk factors Let us remember briefly ASCOT’S study design: Patients included were 40-79 years old, had no history of MI or current CHD, had grade 2 hypertension and at least 3 other CV risk factors. Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139-47

ASCOT Study design 19,257 hypertensive patients ASCOT-BPLA 5.5 years follow-up atenolol ± bendroflumethiazide amlodipine ± perindopril PROBE design placebo atorvastatin 10 mg Double-blind ASCOT-LLA 3.3 years follow-up 10,305 patients TC ≤ 6.5 mmol/L (250 mg/dL) Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139-47

ASCORE Study design Study population: ASCOT patients excluding those with history of CV disease at baseline Primary composite endpoint: first CV event (Death, MI or Stroke) Statistical analysis: Cox proportional hazard models with backward stepwise variable selection

ASCORE Study design Baseline variables defined a priori: Sex Age Ethnicity Education Smoking Diabetes Prev. antihypert. treatment Prev. lipid lowering treatment Aspirin use SBP DBP Heart rate Height Weight BMI Microalbuminuria / proteinuria Renal dysfunction Total cholesterol HDL Fasting LDL Fasting TGs Fasting glucose Creatinine GFR

ASCORE Results ASCOT ASCORE 19,257 15,955 Endpoints at 5 years 1,114 -3302 excluded ASCORE 15,955 Endpoints at 5 years 1,114

ASCORE and ASCORE-S

Model calibration ASCORE ASCORE-S Predicted by ASCORE .15 Predicted by ASCORE .15 Predicted by ASCORE-S Observed (KM) Observed (KM) ASCORE ASCORE-S .10 .10 P-value of Chi2 = 0,22 P-value of Chi2 = 0,49 Risk of having the event in 5 years Risk of having the event in 5 years .05 .05 .00 .00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Deciles of predicted risk Deciles of predicted risk

ROC curves and AUC Sensitivity ASCORE area: 0.664 area: 0.648 ASCORE-S 1.00 0.75 ASCORE Sensitivity area: 0.664 area: 0.648 0.50 ASCORE-S P-value for comparison < 0.0001 0.25 0.00 1-Specificity 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00

External validation INDANA (INdividual Data ANalysis of Antihypertensive intervention trials) 53000 patients 10 antihypertensive trials15-20 years ago Interventions Primarily ß-blockers and diuretics vs placebo

External validation Subset of 13335 patients with no CV history aged 40-80 y, not randomized to placebo Complete data on CV endpoints Complete data for all variables of ASCORE-S

Risk of CV event in 5 years .2 Average risk predicted with ASCORE-S Observed risk in INDANA database .15 Risk of CV event in 5 years .1 .05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Patients by deciles of risk

SBP T.C. ASCOT INDANA Mean change after 5 years 20 1 10 0.5 -10 -0.5 Mean change after 5 years -20 -1 ASCOT -30 -1.5 -40 -2 INDANA -50 -2.5 -60 -3 <150 150-170 170-190 >190 <4 4-6 6-8 >8 SBP at baseline T. Cholesterol at baseline Dahlof B et al. Lancet 2005; 366: 895-906, Sever PS et al. Lancet 2003; 361: 1149-58

Risk of CV event in 5 years .2 Average risk predicted with ASCORE-S Expected risk in INDANA if treatment was as in ASCOT Observed risk in INDANA database .15 Risk of CV event in 5 years .1 .05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Patients by deciles of risk

1-0.9985 exp(0.1*total risk score) We converted the ASCORE and ASCORE-S models into ‘user-friendly’ integer scores for the 5-year risk of the primary composite endpoint. To calculate the total score for a patient, start with the score corresponding to the relevant combination ## of sex and age group. Next add the corresponding points if the patient is ## diabetic (differs depending on sex), a recent ## smoker (differs depending on age group), or ## was on previous anti-hypertensive treatment. For ## SBP and for the laboratory measures (ASCORE only) a scale of points from +0 to +8 is shown under which the values of the variable are given. The estimated probability of cardiovascular death, MI or stroke within 5 years is then equal to the equation ## for ASCORE and ## for ASCORE-S. or derives form the conversion of the total risk score to 5 year probability of CV death, MI or Stroke according to the table ## 1-0.9985 exp(0.1*total risk score)

1-0.9985 exp(0.1*total risk score)

Score conversion to 5 year risk Total Risk score ASCORE ASCORE-S 0.15% 0.34% 10 0.41% 0.92% 12 0.50% 1.12% 14 0.61% 1.37% 16 0.74% 1.67% 18 0.90% 2.04% 20 1.10% 2.49% 22 1.35% 3.03% 24 1.64% 3.68% 26 2.00% 4.48% 28 2.44% 5.45% 30 2.97% 6.61% 32 3.62% 8.02% 34 4.40% 9.70% 36 5.35% 11.72% 38 6.49% 14.12% 40 7.87% 16.97% 42 9.53% 20.32% 44 11.51% 24.23% 46 13.87% 28.74% 48 16.67% 33.89% 50 19.97% 39.68%

ASCORE Summary ASCORE and ASCORE-S models and easy to use score charts 5 year risk prediction in hypertensive patients under treatment Internal and External validation (ASCORE-S) Consistency with contemporary treatment guidelines Established predictors in an up-to-date model ASCORE and ASCORE-S