by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building up capacity for Roma inclusion at local level Kosice, November 6 th, 2013.
Advertisements

The Legitimacy of the parliament: an ongoing challenge, effort and process by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE)
« La démocratie représentative s’est imposé dans son principe au moment où elle s’est fragilisée dans son fonctionnement » Pierre Rosanvallon, La démocratie.
Peace in Europe - the role of the Council of Europe in comparison with the two other institutions OSCE/EU A contribution to the VI. Political Academy on.
Minority(s) representation and recognition through intensive participation in a Direct Democracy A presentation to the JEF&YES’ European Seminar “Majorities.
Chechnya, A tragedy for Europe and Russia : How to make Human Rights also respected in Chechnya 11 propositions for reflections and discussions by Andreas.
Is there a clash between the individual citizen and democracy? Keynote speech for the JMK/FES - Conference on “Values of Social Democracy yesterday, today.
ECML: addressing key challenges in European language education.
Human Rights in the post-Soviet space: Russia and the Council of Europe 9 hypotheses for reflexions and discussions by Andreas Gross (Zurich) (Political.
The European Integration process as a source of inspiration for East - Asia Overcoming nationalisms for gaining more (popular)sovereignty Andreas Gross,
Deliberation is the soul of Direct Democracy (DD) The design of the Referendum process determines the quality of DD - well designed it helps to contribute.
The role of parliamentarians in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing citizens power makes representative.
Direct Democracy-Reform in the center of the making of the new constitution of Zurich by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) Director of the Scientific Institute.
« La démocratie représentative s’est imposé dans son principe au moment où elle s’est fragilisée dans son fonctionnement » Pierre Rosanvallon, La démocratie.
Human Rights and Democracy: An ongoing and never ending individual and collective learning process An introduction to the Swiss Helsinki Committee Youth.
The role of politics for social responsibility in a globalising world New and old forums of expression and actors Andreas Gross, Switzerland, M.P./C o.
THE ROLE OF Young people IN the Democratic process Presentation by Henry Charles, Regional Director of the Commonwealth Youth Programme Caribbean Centre.
T HE CHALLENGE OF A E UROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE : D ELIBERATION AND THE ROLE OF ICT S. Dr. Georgios Papanagnou.
Strengthening democracy by increasing citizen participation would catalyze ecological change The way individuals think about and act in nature reflects.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.
The philosophy of Direct Democracy - why we need it in order to democratize Democracy and what has been achieved so far in Europe Contribution to the seminar.
Direct Democracy in foreign policy: Switzerland and Europe A contribution to the 43rd Otago Foreign Policy School “Power to the People ? Public Participation.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for southkorean.
Lessons from the history of the Swiss Democracy for the Making of a European Constitution Budapest Forum “Towards a More Democratic Europe” November 20.
European transnational campaigning - ‘citizens initiative’ in the new EU- treaty (Art.11.4) National Democracies & transnational structures + Democracies.
150 years of experiences with Direct Democracy Insights and lessons which might be learned from the national, regional and local level in Switzerland Workshop.
“ Ensuring the integrity of Elections”: A common effort ! Some thesis for deliberations to the OSCE Chairmanship Expert Seminar on Electoral Management.
The double crises of today’s democracies: Too indirect and too national - we need more direct and more transnational democracies An introduction to a debate.
Creating legitimacy and integrating diversity by empowering citizens The challenge of election law design for Democracy and Democracy building Workshop.
The quality of a referendum process depends from it’s design In order to create a dynamic relation between citizens and the political system (Direct) Democracy.
”E-Democracy” is only a tool we need - To overcome the double crises of Democracy we have to realize serious constitutional reforms which provides citizens.
The role of citizens, MP’s, Rule of law and Separation of Powers in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing.
Direct Democracy as a opportunity for collective political learning The Swiss foreign policy as a ambivalent example An introduction to a debate at the.
Diversity and Integration as challenges for Democracy Ten hypothesis to be discussed concerning the question, if Switzerland and Hannah Arendt might be.
History, culture, practise and design of Direct Democracy in Switzerland a short introduction from Andreas Gross (MP/Pol.Scientist/ADD)
“The role of political parties in electoral processes”: What parties might do to build and strengthen democracy Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross.
Ways to Direct Citizen Participation in the political decision making of the European Union Some hypothesis and impulses from Andreas Gross, MP/Political.
By Julius T. Tweve THE ROLE OF PUBLIC LIBRARIES IN NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN TANZANIA: INFORMATION INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.
The creation of the Canton Jura: Looking from the outside with a special focus on federalism and (republican) democracy A contribution for a Discussion.
Nils Ehlers Forum for the Future of Democracy Yerevan, October 20 th, 2010.
What may inspire the EU from I&R experiences in Switzerland ? Some discussion points from Andreas Gross at the Meeting “Options and limits.
The political system of Switzerland: ”Built and driven by the society and the sub-national societies” 7 hypothesis as a contribution to the Training program.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.
ECML European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe in Graz.
Competence Sharing in a Federal State
ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP IN JCI
Political representation and democracy
Objectives 1. An understanding of international management and its importance to modern managers 2. An understanding of what constitutes a multinational.
Highlights: Comparing Forms of Government
How would you feel about changing the drinking age? Would you argue for it or against it? Why? Tie your arguments to concepts we have learned.
Promoting Human Rights and Democracy through Education
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy and engine for Nation building
2007 Taiwan Social Quality Workshop Social Quality: A Vision for Asia
CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRACY
Democracy What is democracy? Is democracy a good or bad system? Why?
Legitimacy deficit and Direct democracy: Bulgaria and the EU The design determines the quality of DD - a good design focuses on deliberation, participation.
Challenges of local Direct Democracy in Albania after the administr
Democracy What is democracy? Is democracy a good or bad system? Why?
by Andreas Gross , Dr.h.c. (Switzerland)
The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for Dutch MP’s.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy: Role and Responsibility of the Parliamentary majority and opposition in policy making by Andreas Gross, Dr.h.c.
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES
Challenges of the Democratisation of Democracy from the ECI to local Direct Democracy- “in a non-successful 3rd wave democracy” by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
Civics Education in the U.S.
Participating American Citizens
by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
American Political Culture
Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
The freedom potentials of Direct Democracy (DD) might still be improved - by more and better DD, not less DD ! DD as a modern achievement and an important.
Presentation transcript:

by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) ”E-Democracy” is only a tool we need - To overcome the double crises of Democracy we have to realize serious constitutional reforms which provides citizens with more real power A contribution to the workshop “Opportunities for and challenges to representative democracy“ of the IV. CoE - Forum for the Future of Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) Director of the Scientific Institute for Direct Democracy in St.Ursanne Swiss MP & Leader of the Socialists in the PACE Madrid, 16th of October 2008 www.andigross.ch info@andigross.ch

The double crises of Democracy means: - Democracy is too representative - Democracy is too national 1. We have to open indirect democracy with direct democratic instruments: Citizen initiated referenda on laws decided by MP’s Citizen initiated referenda on constitutional or legislative reform-propositions 2. We have to trans-nationalize democracy: European Constitution making with a mandatory European Referendum Citizen initiated European Reform-Propositions to the EUCom and EP

Such a new sharing of power between Gov/Parl/Citizens would empower the people and democratize Democracy To realize such constitutional changes (Citizens must organize and mobilize) and to use the new direct democratic instruments you need modern ICT, but ICT without these constitutional changes does not means more Democracy yet. High-Tech needs constitutional reforms to trans-form today’s Democracy-light in High-Democracy !

The core idea of Freedom and Democracy: All those who are concerned by a decision should be directly or indirectly part of the decision making process ! Life is not a destiny ! Everybody should have the right, the capacity and the opportunity to act on his and her life together with others.

Education, knowledge, technology, social competences, social and economic progress created in the last 100 years democratic potentials and citizens capacities, our democratic institutions today do not realize ! That’s why we have to brake up the national representative chains Democracy is limited to: The nature of the problems we have to solve ask for this The capacities the citizens have and want to use makes it possible. The ICT provide us with the technology to overcome problems of distance and numbers (European Democracy) as well as complexity and the need to deliberate grounded on knowledge and competence

Nobody wants to replace national representative democracy - we only want to overcome it’s limits and it’s exclusiveness ! Direct Democratic elements make representative Democracy on the local, regional and national level more representative. Transnational Democracy would give citizens back, what the Nation-state lost to the European polity.

A deepened and enlarged Democracy would enable the citizens and societies to learn more from and for each-other ! A better shared political power would multiply the (real and virtual) communications before real decisions are made; this increases the learning capacities of all of us and reduces the risk of errors. Citizens, who are invited to participate in the decision making processes of the society, feel as part of the society again and find trust, identity and identification !

Problems of size, numbers, space, distances, different languages can be overcome for more and better Democracy by ICT/”E-Dem”-Tools But the will to increase Democracy, to make it stronger, deeper and broader, has to be there or has to be generated first. We need to establish a will to share power better ! (A.Mcint:”There has to be some power-sharing”) That’s why some transformations to include direct-democratic elements in Democracy or to move from a Treaty to a Constitution on the European level has been and is seen as “Revolution”: Few loose power, many get some of it !

It might be, that the democratic potentials of ICT/e-Dem-Tools may be evaluated some day by it’s power to unite and organize citizens in a way that the power was shared in a less unequal way ! They should help us to establish the pressure from below we need in order to generate the institutional transformations we need on all levels of Democracy. Democracy can be understood as an ongoing process for a stronger Democracy - being aware that there will never be a perfect Democracy but there are so many ways to reduce it’s imperfectness !