Scientific writing (81-933) Lecture 5: Discussion Dr. Avraham Samson Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic statistics.
Advertisements

How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
Critical and Analytical Thinking Transition Programme
External validity: to what populations do our study results apply?
The Research Question Alka M. Kanaya, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics UCSF October 3, 2011.
Project Partners: 計劃夥伴: Funded by: 捐助機構: Gap of Health Care for Midlife Women: Controlling Risk Factors of Stroke as Example Chau Pui Hing CADENZA Project,
Sakamon Devahastin Department of Food Engineering King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi Bangkok, Thailand February 2, 2015 Critical Reading.
Foos et al, EASD, Lisbon, 13 September 2011 Comparison of ACCORD trial outcomes with outcomes estimated from modelled and meta- analysis studies Volker.
METHODS A systematic review of evidence-based literature was performed using Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies reviewed include randomized controlled.
OBESITY and CHD Nathan Wong. OBESITY AHA and NIH have recognized obesity as a major modifiable risk factor for CHD Obesity is a risk factor for development.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July-August 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2004.
Cohort Studies.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January-February 2005.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2007.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2008.
HEAPHY 1 & 2 DIAGNOSTIC James HAYES Fri 30 th Aug 2013 Session 2 / Talk 4 11:33 – 12:00 ABSTRACT To estimate population attributable risks for modifiable.
Understanding study designs through examples Manish Chaudhary MPH (BPKIHS)
Biology in Focus, HSC Course Glenda Childrawi, Margaret Robson and Stephanie Hollis A Search For Better Health Topic 11: Epidemiology.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLO FOR POME 105. Lesson 3: R H THEKISO:SENIOR PAT TIME LECTURER INE OF PRESENTATION 1.Epidemiologic measures of association 2.Study.
MI: Risk Factors and Primary Prevention. Risk Factors Factors that appear to increase the general population’s chances of experiencing a health problem.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2014.
What’s new in Atopic Eczema Dr. Simon Dawe Consultant Dermatologist West Hertfordshire NHS trust.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Experiments and Observational Studies. Observational Studies In an observational study, researchers don’t assign choices; they simply observe them. look.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Regular exercise and SCORE risk in obese type 2 diabetic patients Autor: Milan Tatić Mentor: Prof. dr Slobodan Antić.
Coffee Consumption and Risk of Myocardial Infarction among Older Swedish Women SA Rosner, A Akesson,MJ. Stampfer, A Wolk; AJE; :
Results.
 Is there a comparison? ◦ Are the groups really comparable?  Are the differences being reported real? ◦ Are they worth reporting? ◦ How much confidence.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
The Effect of Chocolate Consumption on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Stephanie Becker November 24, 2014.
Illinois State University Exercise and Body Composition Relationships of Total and Regional Body Composition to Morbidity and Mortality.
Sense of coherence and carotid artery intima media thickness measurements: presenting four case reports from the Spili cohort in rural Crete, Greece D.
Group 7 Burden of disease in Brazil. KEY HEALTH INDICATORS Years of life lost (YLLs): Years of life lost due to premature mortality. Years lived with.
Thorhallur I. Halldorsson PhD Center for Fetal Programming, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen,Denmark Unit for Nutrition Research, Faculty of Food Science.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
SMOKING AND ESTABLISHED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: THE VARIABLE HABITS OF A PRIMARY CARE COHORT Dr Mairead Corrigan 1 PhD BSSc, Dr Margaret E Cupples 1 MD.
Cardiac Rehabilitation 2011 Update for Primary Care Providers Douglass A Morrison, MD, PhD Cardiac Rehabilitation, Medical Director Yakima Regional and.
Chapter 2 Nature of the evidence. Chapter overview Introduction What is epidemiology? Measuring physical activity and fitness in population studies Laboratory-based.
The Discussion Section. 2 Overall Purpose : To interpret your results and justify your interpretation The Discussion.
END Obesity Dr Gul Bano © S Nussey. What is obesity?
Retinopathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in the TODAY Clinical Trial Featured Article: TODAY Study Group* Diabetes Care Volume 36:
Epidemiological Research. Epidemiology A branch of medical science that deals with the incidence, distribution, and control of disease in a population.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Chapter 3 Physical activity and mortality. Chapter overview Physical activity and mortality Physical fitness and mortality Changes in physical activity.
Claire Springer, Patricia de Castro, Nhu Vu, Daniel Bristow.
CHEST 2014; 145(4): 호흡기내과 R3 박세정. Cigarette smoking ㅡ the most important risk factor for COPD in the US. low value of FEV 1 : an independent predictor.
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis NAFLD and NASH Prevalence in US Cohort Slideset on: Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty.
Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fish Intake, Contaminants, and Human Health: Evaluating.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 13 Experiments and Observational Studies.
Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children: Cardiovascular.
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
Significance of Findings and Discussion
Menzies Health Institute Queensland
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Discussion Section of a Scientific Paper
Healthy Eating Predicts Lower Risks of Cardiometabolic Diseases in Chinese A report from the Shanghai Women’s and Men’s Health Studies Danxia Yu1, Xiao-Ou.
Some hints about writing a scientific paper San Francisco Edit www
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Baseline BMI and Age-Adjusted Incidence of Diabetes Mellitus
DISCUSSION 3rd AMDI Scientific Writing Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff.
High Risk of Heart Disease in South Asians
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Scientific writing (81-933) Lecture 5: Discussion Dr. Avraham Samson Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee 1

2

THE DISCUSSION The Discussion is the section that… Gives you the most freedom Gives you the most chance to put good writing on display Is the most challenging to write

The Discussion The purpose of the discussion: Answer the question posed in the Introduction Support your conclusion with details (yours, others) Defend your conclusion (acknowledge limits, caveats) Highlight the broader implications of the work (i.e., What do my results mean and why should anyone care?) Future plans (optional). Strong conclusion

The Discussion The introduction moves from general to specific. The discussion moves from specific to general.

The Discussion Things to avoid in the discussion: Do not simply repeat what is in the Results Do not try to explain every minor flaw Do not attempt to explain away every unexpected result Do not exaggerate or make extravagant claims Dont hedge

What NOT to do! Dont start your discussion like this!! Discussion This meta-analysis is subject to a number of limitations. The estimates of risk for melanoma subsequent to using sunlamps/sunbeds are based on published data in a series of 10 articles over a period of 20 years. A pooled analysis of original observations taken in the 10 studies would have provided a more powerful approach …

The Discussion: verb tense Verb Tenses (active!): Past, when referring to study details, results, analyses, and background research: We found that They lost more weight than Subjects may have experienced Miller et al. found Present, when talking about what the data suggest … The greater weight loss suggests The explanation for this difference is not clear. Potential explanations include

EXAMPLE: Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of developing diabetes: prospective cohort study BMJ June 2008 END OF INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the association between adherence to a Mediterranean diet and the incidence of diabetes using a full validated food frequency questionnaire to measure the entire diet.

The Discussion 1. This large prospective study shows that a traditional Mediterranean food pattern is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. [answer to question asked]

The Discussion 2. Interestingly, among participants with the highest adherence to the diet, there was a high prevalence of important risk factors for diabetes, such as older age, higher BMI, family history of diabetes, and personal history of hypertension and a higher proportion of ex- smokers. Therefore, we would have expected a higher incidence of diabetes among these participants. These higher risk participants with better adherence to the diet, however, had a lower risk of diabetes, suggesting that the diet might have a substantial potential for prevention. [bonus finding/additional evidence] This finding is consistent with our previous report of an inverse association between a Mediterranean diet and the metabolic syndrome.24 [fits with previous research] The metabolic syndrome is closely associated with a generalised metabolic disorder of insulin resistance, which is one of the underlying causes of type 2 diabetes. Therefore a high biological plausibility exists to support the causality of our findings. [biological mechanisms] In addition, a previous cohort study of survivors of myocardial infarction also reported that a higher adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with a reduction in the risk of type 2 diabetes,18 [fits previous research] despite use of a relatively inaccurate tool for the dietary assessment. The inverse graded dose-response pattern and the significant inverse trend that we observed also support a causal relation. [dose-response evidence]2418

The Discussion 3. Diet and disease.Experimental evidence suggesting that a diet similar to the Mediterranean diet and rich in plant based foods might protect against diabetes can also be found in the Indian diabetes prevention programme. That trial promoted a plant based diet (together with increases in physical activity) and found a significant reduction in the incidence of diabetes,28 although there are clear differences between the Mediterranean and Indian food patterns. There is an analogy between coronary heart disease and diabetes because patients with type 2 diabetes and no coronary heart disease have a risk of coronary heart disease similar to patients without diabetes but with prior coronary heart disease.29 There is evidence that a Mediterranean diet protects against coronary heart disease, and the analogy between coronary heart disease and diabetes suggests that this diet might also prevent diabetes. It has been shown to provide protection against coronary mortality and the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction.32 In addition, both cohort studies and randomised trials36 have found that adherence to a Mediterranean diet protects against mortality in patients who already have established coronary heart disease. [more supporting background evidence]

The Discussion Limitations. The number of new cases of diabetes was small, despite the follow-up of several thousand people for over four years. This small number of incident cases is a major drawback and can compromise the statistical power of our study. Nevertheless, our participants had high absolute levels of consumption of the typical food items of the Mediterranean diet, even among those participants classified as poorly compliant (score <3). For example, among those in the lowest category of adherence to the diet, the estimated mean daily absolute consumption (g/day) of olive oil (12), vegetables (308), fruits (176), cereals (77), and legumes (17) can be considered as healthy for the standards of nutritional epidemiological studies. This high consumption of plant based foods in our cohort could be because our participants were from a Mediterranean country and were highly educated and health conscious. The small number of new cases observed in this study should therefore not be surprising. If the Mediterranean diet is actually protecting against diabetes, we would expecta low incidence in a young cohort (mean age is 37.8 years) with these characteristics. The low number of observed cases precluded assessment of the specific role of single dietary factors because we would have needed [Limitations]

The Discussion Conclusion. Our prospective cohort study suggests that substantial protection against diabetes can be obtained with the traditional Mediterranean diet, rich in olive oil, vegetables, fruits, nuts, cereals, legumes, and fish but relatively low in meat and dairy products. The limited number of cases of diabetes and the possibility of under-reporting, however, requires that further larger cohorts and trials are needed to confirm our findings. [Restatement of the findingstake home message]

1.The answer to the key question asked 2.Whats new 3.The context. How your results fit into, contradict, or add to whats known or believed 4.Strengths and limits of the study 5.Overall conclusion Discussion

16

Subject verb object

Right! The Neanderthal man became extinct 30,000 year ago. Recently however, Neanderthal genes were found in living humans. In addition, Neanderthal features such as long noses and light hair are commonly observed in todays population. These findings suggest that Neanderthals intermarried with Homo Sapiens. 18

Wrong! 30,000 years ago, the Neanderthal man was extincted. In living human, genes of Neanderthals were found. Also, Neanderthal features such as long nose and light hair are commonly observed in todays population. Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals can intermarry. 19

Principles of Effective Writing The fear expressed by some teachers that students would not learn statistics well if they were permitted to use canned computer programs has not been realized in our experience. A careful monitoring of achievement levels before and after the introduction of computers in the teaching of our course revealed no appreciable change in students performances. Really long subject! negatives Passive voice wordy

Principles of Effective Writing The fear expressed by some teachers that students would not learn statistics well if they were permitted to use canned computer programs has not been realized in our experience. A careful monitoring of achievement levels before and after the introduction of computers in the teaching of our course revealed no appreciable change in students performances. Really long subject! Buried predicate + boring verb hedge word

Principles of Effective Writing Many teachers feared that the use of canned computer programs would prevent students from learning statistics. We monitored student achievement levels before and after the introduction of computers in our course and found no detriments in performance.

23

24

1. Peremptory v. preemptive Peremptory = cannot be denied Preemptive = action is one taken before an adversary can act He issued a peremptory order. He ordered a preemptive war in Iraq.

2. Subject v. patient A subject is a volunteer. A patient is under treatment by a doctor. The subjects in our study took a quiz about love. The patients in our study were being treated for their stomach conditions. Alternatives to subject: participants, volunteers, men, women, postmenopausal women, runners, smokers, etc.

3. Strata v. stratum Strata is plural. Stratum is singular. We analyzed the data, adjusting for the different age strata. I was only interested in the association in the stratum of elderly subjects.

4. Nucleus v. nuclei Nuclei is plural. Nucleus is singular. The cell nucleus displayed a pattern of chromosome abnormalities. Proton nuclei in different chemical environments display distinct precession frequencies 28

5. Averse v. adverse Averse means opposed and usually describes a persons attitude. Adverse means hostile, unfavorable, opposed but usually applies to situations, conditions, or eventsnot people. The bad weather has an adverse effect on my car. I would not be averse to trying that new restaurant.

6. Historic v. historical Historic means notable in history. --indicates that it in some way changed the course of human events Historical means relating to history or past events. --not necessarily historic The signing of the Declaration of Independence was a historic moment in American history. Professor Smith gave a historical lecture on the evolution of toothpicks.

7. Ultimate and Penultimate Ultimate: last (from Latin, ultimare=come to an end) Penultimate: second to last (paene=almost; ultimas=last) The ultimate aim was to force his resignation. The character was arrested in the penultimate chapter, setting up the central tension of the final chapter.

32 July 2, 2001 Re: Letter Of Reference To: John Doe To Whom It May Concern: Bob Smith, my assistant programmer, can always be found hard at work in his cubicle. Bob works independently, without wasting company time talking to colleagues. Bob never thinks twice about assisting fellow employees, and he always finishes given assignments on time. Often he takes extended measures to complete his work, sometimes skipping coffee breaks. Bob is a dedicated individual who has absolutely no vanity, in spite of his high accomplishments and profound knowledge in his field. I firmly believe that Bob can be classed as a high-caliber employee, the type which cannot be dispensed with. Consequently, I duly recommend that Bob be promoted to executive management, and a proposal will be executed as soon as possible. Received a short time later: Re: Letter Of Reference To: John Doe Mr. Doe: That idiot was standing over my shoulder while I wrote the letter I sent to you earlier today. Kindly re-read only every other line.