Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Advertisements

Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Intro to Spectral Analysis and Matlab. Time domain Seismogram - particle position over time Time Amplitude.
Houston, TX | May 2, 2012 Finding blind faults using ground roll reflection Craig Hyslop Robert Stewart.
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley University of Utah.
Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
LEAST-SQUARES MIGRATION OF BOTH PRIMARIES AND MULTIPLES Ruiqing He, Gerard Schuster University of Utah Oct
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Projectiles Horizontal Projection Horizontally: Vertically: Vertical acceleration g  9.8 To investigate the motion of a projectile, its horizontal and.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Fourier and Wavelet Transformations Michael J. Watts
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Benefits & Limitations of Least Squares Migration W.Dai,D.Zhang,X.Wang,GTSKAUST RTM Least Squares RTM GOM RTM GOM LSRTM.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
A Migration Approach to Generating Continuous Images of Salt and Sediment Boundaries from Multi-Offset VSP Data Jakob B.U. Haldorsen1, Nicholas Brooks1,
LSM Theory: Overdetermined vs Underdetermined
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Fourier and Wavelet Transformations
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
A pseudo-unitary implementation of the radial trace transform
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Multiple attenuation in the image space
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Least-squares Reverse Time Migration with Frequency-selection Encoding for Marine Data Wei Dai, WesternGeco Yunsong Huang and Gerard T. Schuster, King.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Least Squares Migration
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah

Problem: Ground Roll Degrades Signal Offset (ft) 2000 3500 Reflections Time (sec) Ground Roll 2.5

Problem: PS Waves Degrade Signal Time (sec) Reflections Converted S Waves 4.0

Problem: Tubes Waves Obscure PP 2000 Depth (ft) 3100 Reflections Time (sec) Reflections Time (s) Aliased tube waves Converted S Waves 0.14 4.0

Problem: Out-of-Plane Ground Roll

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion

Traditional Filtering Methods F-K Dip Filtering Filtering in  - p domain linear  - p parabolic  - p hyperbolic  - p Least Squares Migration Filter

SIGNAL SIGNAL NOISE NOISE Separation Principle: Exploit Differences in Moveout & Part. Velocity Directions SIGNAL Overlap Signal & Noise SIGNAL NOISE Transform Time Frequency NOISE Distance Wavenumber

Tau-P Transform Sum Transform Time Tau Distance P

Tau-P Transform Tau-P Transform Time Tau Distance P

Tau-P Transform Tau-P Transform Mute Noise Transform Time Tau Distance P

Separation Signal/Noise Tau-P Transform Problem: Indistinct Separation Signal/Noise Transform Time Tau Distance P

Hyperbolic Transform Tau-P Transform Time Tau Distinct Separation Signal/Noise Distance P

Breakdown of Hyperbolic Assumption * v v v v v v v v v Irregular Moveout B Time A Distance

Filtering by Parabolic - p Time Time Signal/Noise Overlap A Distance p

d = L m d d = L m + L m Filtering by LSMF Invert for m & m s Kirchhoff p s Kirchhoff Modeler P-reflectivity d = L m p d d = L m + L m s PP Time PS Distance

Filtering by LSMF L -1 s PP Time Z L -1 p PS Distance X M1 M2

Find m by conjugate gradient LSMF Method d = L m + L m s p 1. data unknowns 2. Find m by conjugate gradient p d = L m p 3. Model Coherent Signal

Multicomponent Filtering by LSMF PS PP PS PP Time Z s d = L m + L m p x z Distance

Summary Traditional coherent filtering based on approximate moveout LSMF filtering operators based on actual physics separating signal & noise Better physics --> Better focusing, more $$$

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Surface Wave Data Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion

ARCO Field Data Offset (ft) 2000 3500 Time (sec) 2.5

LSM Filtered Data (V. Const.) ARCO Field Data LSM Filtered Data (V. Const.) Offset (ft) 2000 3500 Time (sec) 2.5

F-K Filtered Data (13333ft/s) LSM Filtered Data (V. Const.) Offset (ft) 2000 3500 Time (sec) 2.5

F-X Spectrum of ARCO Data S. of LSM Filtered Data (V. Const) S. of F-K Filtered Data (13333ft/s) Offset (ft) 2000 3500 Frequency (Hz) 50

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Mahogony Example Conclusion and Discussion

Graben Velocity Model X (m) 5000 V1=2000 m/s V2=2700 m/s V3=3800 m/s 5000 V1=2000 m/s V2=2700 m/s V3=3800 m/s Depth (m) V4=4000 m/s V5=4500 m/s 3000

Synthetic Data Horizontal Component Vertical Component Offset (m) 5000 5000 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

LSMF Separation Horizontal Component Vertical Component Time (s) Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) 5000 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

True P-P and P-SV Reflection Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) 5000 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

F-K Filtering Separation Offset (m) 5000 Offset (m) 5000 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Mahogony Field Data Conclusion and Discussion

CRG1 Raw Data PS Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

CRG1 Data after Using F-K Filtering PS Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

CRG1 Data after Using LSMF PS Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

CRG2 Raw Data (vertical component) Time (s) 4 CRG2 (Vertical component)

CRG2 Data after Using F-K Filtering (vertical component) Time (s) 4 CRG2 (Vertical component)

CRG2 Data after Using LSMF (vertical component) Time (s) 4 CRG2 (Vertical component)

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion

Conclusions Filtering signal/noise using: moveout difference & particle velocity direction - Traditional filtering $ vs $$$$ LSMF LSMF computes moveout and particle velocity direction based on true physics.