Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabio Trovato, Edward P. O’Brien  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
BamA POTRA Domain Interacts with a Native Lipid Membrane Surface
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Maik Goette, Martin C. Stumpe, Ralf Ficner, Helmut Grubmüller 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
J.L. Robertson, L.G. Palmer, B. Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Nucleotide Effects on the Structure and Dynamics of Actin
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Firdaus Samsudin, Alister Boags, Thomas J. Piggot, Syma Khalid 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Rita Pancsa, Daniele Raimondi, Elisa Cilia, Wim F. Vranken 
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Tsuyoshi Terakawa, Shoji Takada  Biophysical Journal 
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Chris Neale, Henry D. Herce, Régis Pomès, Angel E. García 
Agnes Noy, Anthony Maxwell, Sarah A. Harris  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Computational Modeling of Structurally Conserved Cancer Mutations in the RET and MET Kinases: The Impact on Protein Structure, Dynamics, and Stability 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Mijo Simunovic, Gregory A. Voth  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Differential Mismatch Recognition Specificities of Eukaryotic MutS Homologs, MutSα and MutSβ  Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal  Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages 2483-2492 (June 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Crystal structure of human MutSα bound to a G:T mismatch containing DNA (PDB ID: 2O8B). (B) human MutSβ bound to unpaired IDL-containing DNA (PDB ID: 3THX). Structural domains of the two subunits are shown in different colors and the mismatch/insertion sites in the DNA heteroduplexes are shown in black. ADP molecules bound at the ATPase domain are shown with a spherical representation. The black boxes indicate the interactions of protein with the mismatch site. These crystal structure contacts are shown in inset panels between (C) MutSα and G:T mismatch site and (D) MutSβ and IDL site. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RMSD of protein and DNA backbone atoms with respect to the crystal structure for (A) MutSβ and (B) MutSα systems. The top two panels show results for the protein subunits whereas the bottom panels show the structural deviations of the DNA-heteroduplexes. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DNA-binding induced movement of clamp domains. (A) Distances between the centers of masses (spheres) for the clamps (colored regions) of each subunit as observed for the crystal structure of MutSα and MutSβ. (B) Time variations of these distances, r (Å), are plotted for multiple runs for WT, Swapped, and APO states of MutSα and MutSβ. The crystal structure values are shown as black dotted lines. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Probability distributions of DNA kink angles, ξ, (as defined in Methods) observed during the simulations (ignoring the first 10 ns). (A) Mismatch containing heteroduplexes when in the native environment bound to MutSα (WT_MutSα, green) and in the swapped environment bound to MutSβ (Swap_MutSβ-MM, orange). (B) 4L in native environment bound to MutSβ (WT_MutSβ-4L, green) and in swapped environment bound to MutSα (Swap_MutSα-4L, orange). (C) 3L in native environment bound to MutSβ (WT_MutSβ-3L, green). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Representative structures of nucleic acid conformations from clustering. The mismatch and IDL parts are shown in green with neighboring residues in gray. The CS panel represents the crystal structures and clusters are ordered with respect to their cluster size. Values given in parentheses correspond to heavy atom RMSDs with respect to the experimental structure. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Contacts present for at least 20% of the simulation time (ignoring the first 10 ns) between protein subunits (residues on the y axis) and mismatch containing DNA (nucleotides on the x axis). The mismatch pair Gua8:Thy23 is indicated with a black dotted line. Green circles denote interactions between mismatch DNA and cognate MSH6 (left panel) or MSH2 (right panel) in WT_MutSα; red diamonds denote the interaction of mismatch DNA with noncognate MSH3 (left panel) or MSH2 (right panel) in Swap MutSβ-MM. The extent of the interaction is indicated by the size of the symbol, with largest size corresponding to the interaction present persistently and smaller size corresponding to the intermittent interaction. Residue correspondence between MSH3 and MSH6 was obtained by structurally aligning MSH3 subunit to the MSH6 subunit using STAMP (29). A dash in the first two columns indicates a lack of a corresponding residue. The MSH2 subunit of MutSα has the first N-terminal 12 nucleotides resolved, which are absent in MutSβ. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Protein-DNA contacts as in Fig. 6 but for IDL-containing DNA. Unpaired residues Cyt14, Ade36-Ade38, and Gua39 are indicated by black dotted lines. Orange circles denote the interaction of IDL DNA with cognate MSH3 (left panel) or MSH2 (right panel) in WT_MutSβ and blue diamonds denote the interaction of IDL DNA with noncognate MSH6 (left panel) or MSH2 (right panel) in Swap_MutSα-4L. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Interactions at the mismatch site for DNA heteroduplexes observed in the crystal structure of (A) MutSα and (B) MutSβ compared with the simulated structures for (C) Swap_MutSβ-MM and (D) Swap_MutSα-4L. Three average structures are shown for each of the three simulations. The mismatch site is shown with yellow sticks, and the adjacent base pairs are shown in gray. The interacting protein residues are shown in stick-and-ball representation (green for MSH6, cyan for MSH3, and pink for MSH2). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 2483-2492DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.026) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions