Time to discontinuation of TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i) and non-TNF-inhibitors (non-TNFi), non-adjusted (non-adj) and adjusted (adj) for propensity score survival.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Correlations of CD68, CD21, CD3, CD20 and CD117 immunohistochemical staining between paired synovial tissue (ST) and colonic mucosa (CM) biopsies of patients.
Advertisements

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for CD68/CD21 and CD3/CD20 on synovial tissue (ST) of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with onset of peripheral.
Multivariable model of abatacept retention in biologic-naïve patients.
Persistence of first tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) by TNFi Kaplan-Meier plot of time (years) to discontinuation of treatment by TNFi. (A)
Multivariable model of abatacept retention by RF and anti-CCP status in biologic-naïve patients with or without radiographic erosion at baseline. Multivariable.
(A) EULAR response based on DAS28 (ESR, otherwise CRP) and (B) Boolean remission, at 6 months in patients treated with abatacept as a first-line biologic.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for CD117 on synovial tissue (ST) of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with onset of peripheral arthritis.
Example choice set: DAS28, 28 joint disease activity score; EUR, Euro; QALY, quality-adjusted life year. * In the choice sets, changes of the individual.
Kaplan-Meier survival plots for survival without: (A) progression to RA according to the number of joints with significant synovitis defined by GS≥ grade.
Percentage of patients achieving EULAR response
ASAS 20/40 response rates, and mean change from baseline in BASDAI through week 156* of treatment. *For patients who discontinued, the end of treatment.
Association of disease parameters at the time of methotrexate reinitiation during the OLE based on propensity score matching. Association of disease parameters.
Flow diagram of the literature search process, including exclusions and reasons for exclusions. *Population of pregnant women (n=2), asymptomatic antiphospholipid.
Patient disposition through 48 weeks in RA-BEYOND
Changes in clinical disease activity over 24 months on a continuous scale in SWEFOT trial participants randomised to triple therapy or anti-TNF with available.
ASAS 20/40 responses in anti-TNF-naïve and anti-TNF-IR subjects at weeks 52, 104 and 156. ASAS 20/40 responses in anti-TNF-naïve and anti-TNF-IR subjects.
The patient profiles presented to rheumatologists in the discrete choice experiment (DCE). aCCP, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide; DAS28, 28-joint Disease.
Frequency of patients in flare at each time point over 3 months
Schematic presentation of enrichment through linkages of clinical Rheumatology register data to other national data sources within each of the five Nordic.
ACR response rates at 24 weeks in patients treated with PBO, IXEQ4W or IXEQ2W alone or in combination with cDMARDs or MTX. The proportions of patients.
MTX-PG concentrations and hepatotoxicity.
The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. The severity of fatigue over 8 years of disease in early rheumatoid.
Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years versus younger patients: ACR outcomes at (A) week 12 and (B) week 24. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥65.
Ratings of core domains stratified by stakeholder group in the second Delphi round. Ratings of core domains stratified by stakeholder group in the second.
Factors influencing the relationship between disease activity (as measured with the ASDAS) and radiographic progression (as measured with the 2-year mSASSS.
DAS28-CRP cut-off values corresponding to the DAS28-ESR cut-off values for remission, LDA and HDA, average of three statistical approaches. DAS28-CRP cut-off.
Nelson-Aalen plots comparing nbDMARD and TNFi cohorts for each outcome
Probability plots JSN score at baseline (A), 10 years (B) and progression (C) for the different age groups (darkest dots: group
Independent baseline predictors of non-remission at 24 months of follow-up in the SWEFOT trial population. Independent baseline predictors of non-remission.
Treatment strategy. Treatment strategy. For every patient, changes of treatment were analysed per change, for up to five subsequent therapeutic changes.
Prescription rates of (A) NSAIDs, glucocorticoids and analgaesics, (B) TNF inhibitors and synthetic DMARDs and (C) combination therapy of NSAIDs with TNF.
Different scenarios that explain the effect that an external factor (here occupational activity—blue collar vs white collar—used as an example) could hypothetically.
Properties of leucocyte subset-specific type 1 interferon (IFN-1) modules. Properties of leucocyte subset-specific type 1 interferon (IFN-1) modules. (A)
Maximum mean (SE) per cent change in serum urate from baseline (Emax) following once-daily oral administration of varying verinurad doses in combination.
Difference in the risk of MACEs in patients treated with anti–IL17 agents compared with the placebo in RCTs. IL,interleukin; MACEs, major adverse cardiovascular.
Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments in RA (A), PsA (B) or AS (C). Patient-reported adherence towards different IMID treatments.
Relative impact of the different levels of education on the physical and mental components of SF-12 across the different chronic disorders. Relative impact.
Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without GC, bDMARDs/tofacitinib with and without GC on the x axis. Patients with RA on csDMARDs with and without.
Adjusted estimates of DAS28 (95% CI) and RAPID3 (95% CI) scores over time based on multivariate models a priori adjusted for possible confounders: age,
Kaplan-Meier One Minus Survival plot showing cumulative progression to clinical arthritis for patients with clinically suspect arthralgia divided in four.
(A–D). (A–D). B-cell and Ig changes. Mean changes in total CD3-CD20+ B-cells (A) and immunoglobulin (Ig) subclasses levels (B-D) were measured over 24 weeks.
Difference in the risk of MACEs in patients treated with anti-IL23 agents compared with the placebo in RCTs. IL, interleukin; MACEs, major adverse cardiovascular.
Colonoscopy completion rates by individual endoscopist: unadjusted and adjusted so that the denominator includes flexible sigmoidoscopy procedures requested.
Improvement in FACIT-F fatigue score according to ACR20 response status (ACR, American College of Rheumatology; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic.
ACR20 response rates. ACR20 response rates. ACR20 response rates based on non-responder imputation (NRI) for the 120/Q4W, 90/Q2W and placebo groups over.
Relative treatment effects concerning efficacy endpoints in patients with inadequate response to methotrexate for triple therapy versus TNFi–methotrexate.
Rates of ACR50 response and prespecified MTX-related adverse events in patients in the (A) CONCERTO study over 26 weeks and (B) MUSICA study over 24 weeks. ACR50, American.
ACR20/50/70 response rates at week 24 (TP1 per-protocol set).
Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. Characteristics of the included trials on non-pharmacological treatment. ASDAS,
Frequency of methotrexate (MTX) doses at 24 months (plot) and summary of MTX doses across the MTX dosing categories (low, medium, high) based on data at.
Ultrasonographic characteristics and synovitis pattern of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with onset of peripheral arthritis under tumour.
Efficacy as first, second and third bDMARD in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. ASAS, Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis international Society; BASDAI,
Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. Study design. *Randomisation stratified by corticosteroid use at baseline. DAS28-CRP,
Difference in the risk of MACEs in patients treated with anti-TNF agents compared with the placebo in RCTs. MACEs, major adverse cardiovascular events;
Satisfaction with control of RA
Summary multiple regression charts for (A) PROFAD physical fatigue and (B) PROFAD mental fatigue scores. Summary multiple regression charts for (A) PROFAD.
Classification tree with the selected characteristics.
Follow-up and cause of anti-TNF-α discontinuation in 15 patients with rhupus. anti-TNF-α, antitumour necrosis factor alpha; ESR, erythrocyte sediment rate;
Network graph illustrating the relation between the assessed structural abnormalities on different locations within the knee joint in the total NEO study.
Systematic review and network meta-analyses study selection flow chart
Changes over time in DAS 28 (A), SLEDAI (B), glucocorticoid dose (C) and EULAR response (D) in patients with rhupus treated by anti-TNF-α. Box plot (median,
Kaplan-Meier estimate of drug continuation until discontinuation for tocilizumab, canakinumab, anakinra and etanercept, as a first biological agent for.
Multivariable model of adjusted
Graphical representation of the content of the Social Role Participation Questionnaire (SRPQ), which assesses several dimensions of role participation.
Percent of patients with ASDAS inactive disease grouped by normal or elevated CRP at baseline through week 156. §p
NRDC and TNF-α increase in synovial fluid from patients with RA
Serum osteopontin (sOPN) concentrations in patients with giant cell arteritis and healthy controls. (A) sOPN concentrations in active patients with giant.
Changes in non-classical (CD11b+CD14+CD163−CD16+) and classical (CD11b+CD14+CD163+CD16−) monocytes over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
Kaplan-Meier failure curves with development of RA stratified by depression exposure. Kaplan-Meier failure curves with development of RA stratified by.
Distribution of points (%) across the ESSDAI domains in patients with neurological involvement and in those with non-neurological systemic involvement.
Presentation transcript:

Time to discontinuation of TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i) and non-TNF-inhibitors (non-TNFi), non-adjusted (non-adj) and adjusted (adj) for propensity score survival curves. Time to discontinuation of TNF-inhibitors (TNF-i) and non-TNF-inhibitors (non-TNFi), non-adjusted (non-adj) and adjusted (adj) for propensity score survival curves. (A) First biologic. (B) Second biologic. (C) First biologic with onset ≥2005. (D) Second biologic with onset ≥2005. TNF inhibitor versus non-TNF inhibitor (first biologic): Whole follow-up, unadjusted HR 0.48 (0.34 to 0.69), adjusted HR 0.49 (0.34 to 0.71); Started biologic ≥2005: unadjusted HR 0.59 (0.40 to 0.87), adjusted HR 0.60 (0.41 to 0.90). TNF inhibitor versus non-TNF inhibitor (second biologic): Whole follow-up, unadjusted HR 0.64 (0.48 to 0.84), adjusted HR 0.68 (0.51 to 0.90); Started biologic ≥2005: unadjusted HR 0.78 (0.58 to 1.06), adjusted HR 0.82 (0.60 to 1.12). Sofia Ramiro et al. RMD Open 2015;1:e000155 Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group & EULAR. All rights reserved.