LINX LINear collider IR X-ing facility at SLAC Snowmass 2001 July 11 Andrei Seryi, SLAC for NLC collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPS-HEP Aachen 2003R. Brinkmann, DESY Linear Colliders R. Brinkmann, DESY EPS-HEP Conference, Aachen, July 17, 2003.
Advertisements

PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
SLAC ILC Accelerator: Luminosity Production Peter Tenenbaum HEP Program Review June 15, 2005.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Accelerator R&D on LC - Activities of ATF & STF - 1. Introduction 2. ATF 3. STF 4. Summary Seiya Yamaguchi, KEK The US/Japan Collaboration in High Energy.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
SB2009/ Low energy running for ILC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Andrei Seryi John Adams Institute 19 October 2010.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
Optimization of L(E) with SB2009 Andrei Seryi, for BDS and other working groups LCWS 2010 / ILC 2010 March 28, 2010.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
GDE questions, including one or two IRs Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei Seryi for WG4 Snowmass, CO, August 25, 2005 Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei.
Global Design Effort Introduction and goals of the meeting Andrei Seryi, Toshiaki Tauchi Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting December 19-21, 2007.
SABER, “maybe” a new facility in the South Arc (South Arc Beam Experimental Region) End Station A (ESA) in 2007 ILC Test Beams in 2008 Test Beams beyond.
Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Status of ATF2 linear collider focus prototype emphasizing France-China joint contributions Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire Université.
ATF2 Status Background for the installation planning of Collimator
Special ATF Session - ATF/ATF2 day on 28th September -
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
Near IR FF design including FD and longer L* issues
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
For discussion of Final Focus and IR of plasma-based collider
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Testbeam plans for LEP instrumentation
Oversea collaborators
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
CLIC Study Aim Conceptual design report in 2010
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Summary of Gamma-Gamma session
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Andrei Seryi Materials for discussion TILC-08
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Introduction / Comments on instrumentation issues
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
FACET Accelerator Overview
LHC External Collimation Review
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Raimondi-Seryi Final Focus for e+e- Factories?
FACET Accelerator Overview
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Presentation transcript:

LINX LINear collider IR X-ing facility at SLAC Snowmass 2001 July 11 Andrei Seryi, SLAC for NLC collaboration

Why do we need IR-FF test facility? IR and FF are one of the most critical areas of LC Prior to start of construction, need to build and refine full scale engineering prototypes and perform adequate tests

LINX letter of intent

LINX engineering test facility e+e- collisions at SLC with ~50nm beams NLC 250 GeV 300/2 360/3.5 same 0.11mm 245/2.7nm 7.5e9 Beam Energy: 30 GeV DR emittances: gx,y=1100/50E-8m FF emittances: gx,y=1600/160E-8m IP Betas: x=8mm y=0.1mm Bunch length:  z=0.1 - 1.0mm IP spot sizes: x,y=1500/55nm Beam currents: N= 6e9 Test stabilization techniques proposed for future linear colliders and demonstrate nanometer stability of colliding beams Investigate new optical techniques for control of beam background Provide a facility where ultra-small and ultra-short beams can be used for a variety of other experiments

LINX IR and optics LINX FF NLC FF LINX IR

Nanometer stability of colliding beams Beam-beam deflection gives 1nm stability resolution BPM res Colliding beams provide a Direct Model-Independent test of any engineering solutions to the final doublet stability problem Not possible at FFTB

Controlling beam background with nonlinear elements Tail Folding via Octupole Pairs has the promise of relaxing collimation depths Confidence that comes from an Actual Demonstration may permit a great savings in collimator design, radiation shielding, and muon shielding

Technical feasibility of LINX Parasitic to PEP-II Operation: 30 HZ, 30 GeV Damping Rings: Typical SLC run: gex,y =2900/150E-8m-rad Typical FFTB gex,y = / 90E-8m-rad => need x2-3 improvement “Best” SLC gex,y = / 70E-8m-rad LINX: Reduced rep rate allows “long store” AND simple rewiring allows shift of magnetic center of QFs in ring to act as combined function magnets and to decrease ex,y by x3 Linac: No different than 1994-1997 FFTB runs and recent (E150,E157) FFTB plasma experiments Arcs: 30 GeV running reduces SR emittance growth to ~0 Final Focus: Optics are “EASY”; need only: New doublet w/ sextupoles New octupole pair to investigate tail control

Ultra-short & -low emittance beams Producing NLC-like beams increase confidence in the program Various tests relevant to NLC or exploiting the short bunches may be performed: Plasma wakefield acceleration studies Traveling focus study Low latency Feed-forward orbit correction Collimator tests Instrumentation test-bed Gamma-gamma collisions

What else can be done @ LINX? Tests of fast feedforward Tests of traveling focus (allows to play with by/sz) Position of focus is moving during collision [Balakin 91]

DECISION POINT TO PROCEED & CONSTRUCT DOUBLET LINX staging Step 1: Successfully transport e+ and e- beams to the north and south beam dumps respectively. Step 2: Demonstrate that the SLC beamlines can still deliver high quality colliding beams. DECISION POINT TO PROCEED & CONSTRUCT DOUBLET Step 3: Produce ultra-short beams. Step 4: Evaluate the effectiveness of background suppression with the new Final Focus optics. Step 5: Produce ultra-low emittance beams. Step 6: Develop fast intra-pulse feedback hardware INSTALL NEW DOUBLET Step 7: Produce < 100 nm vertical beam size at the IP. Step 8: Demonstrate nanometer stabilization at the IP.

LINX timeline

Summary LINX engineering test facility is been considered to be created at SLAC on the base of existing hardware it will help to: Test stabilization techniques proposed for future linear colliders and demonstrate nanometer stability of colliding beams Investigate new optical techniques for control of beam background Provide a facility where ultra-small and ultra-short beams can be used for a variety of other experiments We are in the process of restoration the SLC arcs vacuum and hardware, and evaluating technical feasibility of the proposal

Summary Effective design of an Interaction Region of a linear collider is a challenge, but the IR is also special because its problems are common in any incarnation of linear collider and the solutions that may be found will be applicable to any design, regardless of the choice of RF technology. The NLC collaboration is addressing the Worldwide Linear Collider community to consider participation in the LINX test facility. We believe that this test facility is of significant scientific importance and that such participation will be for our mutual benefit.

Let’s submit the LINX letter of intent jointly ! Summary Preliminary discussion shows positive reaction from our colleagues from CERN, DESY and KEK Let’s submit the LINX letter of intent jointly ! Lets joint our efforts and build it !

Acknowledgement Special thanks to Leif Eriksson, Lew Keller, Rainer Pitthan and many other people who are working on evaluation of technical feasibility of LINX The tail folding development by octupoles were inspired by earlier enthusiastic work of Reinhard Brinkmann, Dick Helm, Rainer Pitthan, Frank Zimmermann and other people F. Zimmermann, “Octupoles in Front of the Final Doublet”, NLC Accelerator Physics Note, July 14, 1998. R. Pitthan, “Using Octupoles for Background Control in Linear Colliders - an Exploratory Conceptual Study”, SLAC-PUB-8402, 1999. R.Brinkmann, “An Effective Acceptance Expander for the FFS”, presented at Beam Delivery and Interaction Region Workshop, July 2000, Thanks to all who expressed interest and support the LINX proposal