Stamatia Destounis, MD, FACR, FSBI, FAIUM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breast Cancer. Introduction Most common female cancer Accounts for 32% of all female cancer 211,300 new cases yearly and rising 40,000 deaths yearly.
Advertisements

†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
BREAST CANCER SCREENING Anoop Agrawal, M.D.. NEW USPSTF BREAST SCREENING GUIDELINES Published by US Preventative Screening Task Force in November 2009.
Controversies in Breast Cancer Allan Arkush, DO, FACOS.
Breast Cancer in Pregnancy
Breast MR Imaging Workshop th September 2014 High-Risk Screening Evidence-based Clinical Indications for Breast MRI Dr. Muhamad Zabidi Ahmad, AMDI.
An update for Illinois Nurses Elizabeth A. Peralta, MD The Breast Center at SIU Springfield, IL May 2011.
Breast Cancer Tumor Board Chair Harold Burstein, MD, PhD Faculty Jennifer Bellon, MD Mehra Golshan, MD.
Role of MRI in Breast Cancer Angela Kong Princess Margaret Hospital.
Breast Cancer 101 Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery
Geriatric Health Maintenance: Cancer Screening Linda DeCherrie, MD Geriatric Fellow Mount Sinai Hospital.
Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
How to Overcome Barriers and Develop Collaborative Guidelines Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Chair, Guidelines International Network Director, Clinical.
Elshami M.Elamin, MD Medical Oncologist Central Care Cancer Center Wichita, KS, USA
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Clare Rogers Consultant Breast Surgeon Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals.
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #1 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
Finding N.E.M.O. Marvin R. Balaan, MD, FCCP System Division Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh.
Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Weighing the Risks and Benefits Kathy J. Helzlsouer, M.D., M.H.S. Prevention and Research Center, Women’s.
Management of DCIS KWH Experience Dr. Carmen Ho.
11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society Semih Gorgulu,
Katie Ludwig FY1.   50, 285 New cases of breast cancer  11, 716 deaths  78% - 10 year survival rates  27% preventable cases  Source:
HER2 POSITIVE BREAST CARCINOMA IN THE PRE AND POST ADJUVANT ANTI-HER-2 THERAPY ERA: A SINGLE ACADEMIC INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE IN THE SETTING OUTSIDE OF.
HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences.
Neoadjuvant SystemicTreatment Strategies for Breast Cancer Donald W. Northfelt, MD, FACP Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Associate.
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
During this presentation the learner will be able to: 1. Understand current breast cancer screening guidelines for mammography. 2. Compare and contrast.
Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is a disease in which malignant cells form in the tissues of the breast – “National Breast Cancer Foundation” The American.
Screening of genital cancers Evidence Based Presented by Dr\ Heba Nour.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
[Insert Organization Name] Making the Case for Lung Cancer Screening.
Basis and Outcome of Axillary Dissection for Node Negative Axilla Gurpreet Singh Dept. Of Surgery P.G.I.M.E.R. These Power Point presentations are free.
Breast Density: Black, White and Shades of Gray Jen Rusiecki, MD VA Pittsburgh Health System Women’s Health Fellow AMWA Hot Topic 2016.
Breast Cancer 1. Leukemia & Lymphoma New diagnoses each year in the US: 112, 610 Adults 5,720 Children 43,340 died of leukemia or lymphoma in
PSA screening Cost Conscious Project Kristopher Huston January 2016.
How Do We Individualize Guidelines in an Era of Personalized Medicine? Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS VA Palo Alto Health Care System Stanford University, Stanford.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase III MF07-01 Trial: Impact of Initial Local Resection on Stage.
Making the Case for Lung Cancer Screening
TMIST A Breast Cancer Screening Trial
Cancer Screening Guidelines
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
Number of brain metastasis
Underwriting Breast Cancer
Ari Brooks, MD Cancer Surgeon, Big Data End User
Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer:
Operative Approach and
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
Breast conserving surgery (BCT): Every millimetre counts
Surgical Management of the Breast in Breast Cancer
Definition of Cancer Screening
But how to treat those with positive SLNB? Results and Discussion
2017 USPSTF Draft Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Screening
Dr. John Jordan Dr. Stephen Pautler
Breast Screening and Risk Assessment
Thanh Nhan Hospital MALE BREAST CANCER: CASE REPORT
Making the Case for Lung Cancer Screening
Breast Health Katherine B. Lee, MD, FACP April 26, 2018.
徐慧萍1 羅竹君1,2 郭耀隆1 李國鼎1 國立成功大學醫學院附設醫院外科部1 國立成功大學醫學院臨床醫學研究所2
Dr T P E Wells 13 July 2018 Breast SSG Bath
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
Treatment Overview: The Multidisciplinary Team
Disclosure I am human and I have biases.
Breast Cancer.
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Badwe RA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 72.
Breast Cancer Guideline Update – Sharp Focus on Who is at Risk
Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States Screening mammography performance metrics are.
Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: Delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging 95% of patients.
Presentation transcript:

Screening Mammography: There is Value in Screening Women Aged 75 and Over Stamatia Destounis, MD, FACR, FSBI, FAIUM Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC. Clinical Professor University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry

Background: Screening Mammography in the Aging Population US guidelines unclear regarding when to stop screening Population over 74 years of age not included in RCTs – best available data from observational studies, and prediction models

Background – USPSTF Recommendation Insufficient evidence to assess the benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years and older Evidence is lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined Siu AL, et al. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 20106; 164: 279-296.

Background- Society Recommendations American Cancer Society – continue as long as woman is in good health and is expected to live 10 more years or longer [Smith RA, et al. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 297-316.] American College of Radiology -  The age to stop screening should be based on each woman’s health status rather than an age-based determination [Monticciolo DL, et al. JACR 2017; 14: 1137-1143.]

Background- Breast Cancer in the Elderly Nearly 1/5 breast cancers occur in women 75 or older Cancer detection rates and PPV for biopsy are highest and recall rates are lowest in the 70-plus age group [Lee CS, et al. JAMA Oncol 2017], confirming screening efficacy in this group Elderly women who do not participate in screening more likely to present with higher stage cancers [Vyas et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; Badgwell et al. JCO 2008; McCarthy et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000], with reduced survival [McCarthy, Vacek et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; McPherson et al. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002 ] REFS FROM ACR RECOMMENDATIONS ARTICLE Dijck JV, Verbeek AL, Beex LV, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Mravunac M, et al. Breast-cancer mortality in a non-randomized trial on mammographic screening in women over age 65. International journal of cancer. 1997;70(2):164-8.

Study Purpose To review outcomes of screening mammography performed in women 75 and over to determine the rate of cancer diagnosed and associated histology and surgical excision performed

Methods and Materials IRB approved retrospective review of medical records to identify patients with cancers diagnosed at screening mammography over 10-year period (2007-2017) 763,256 total screening appointments 3,716 patients diagnosed with 4,412 screen-detected malignancies (5.8 cancers/1000) during this time 4.9 patients/1000 76,885 (10%) screening mammograms were performed in women 75 and over 671 patients diagnosed with 751 malignancies identified for further evaluation

Results 645 malignancies diagnosed in 616 patients included in analysis Cancer detection rate: 8.4/1000 645/76885 26 excluded – found on US,

Results – Tumor Metrics Average size of invasive tumors – 1.4cm (range 0.07mm – 8cm) No residual disease in 11 cases 16 no surgery performed 14 no tumor size specified 84% of tumors were estrogen receptor (ER) positive 7% of patients had positive nodes at excision (46/616)

Results Overall, 98% of patients underwent surgical excision: 73% of tumors were treated with lumpectomy 24% mastectomy 3% no surgery performed 13 patients with 17 malignant tumors did not undergo surgical excision Avg. patient age = 85 years Comorbidities included: advanced patient age, overall poor health, metastatic disease Approx. 12 of these patients were treated with hormone therapy

82 year old presenting for screening mammogram

Grade 2 Invasive ductal carcinoma Stage IA Node negative ER/PR +, Her2Neu – Lumpectomy + radiation Stable follow-up

Discussion The goal of screening is to detect breast cancers when tumors are small and node negative lower stage and before metastasis The cancers detected in this study were largely invasive (82%), low stage (79%) and node negative (92.5%) There is a substantial cancer detection rate in this group (8.4/1000) - meeting ACR’s desired goals for medical audit data

Conclusions There are benefits of screening yearly after age 75 This age-group makes up a relatively small percentage of total screening population (10%), yet cancer diagnoses make up 16.6% of all patients diagnosed with screen-detected cancers High CDR= 8.4/1000 98% underwent surgical excision, suggesting that most women in this age group are in good health and do want to pursue surgical excision There are benefits of screening yearly after age 75

Thank You “The decision sdestounis@ewbc.com “The decision regarding when to stop screening should not be based on age alone” – ACR, SBI