Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1043 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0255r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0259r3 Submission March 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: March 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /1042r3 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Doc.: IEEE /0257r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.:IEEE /0259r4 Submission March 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: March 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0258r7 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1042r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Doc.: IEEE /0042r1 Submission January 2013 Yongho Seok, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Fast Moving Scan Channel Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0158r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.:IEEE /0258r6 Submission May 2012 Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery Slide 1 Authors: May 2012 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
Access Control Mechanism for FILS
Omission of Probe Request
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
FILS presentation on High Level Security Requirements
AP Discovery Information Broadcasting
Fast Authentication in TGai
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Multi-channel information for AP discovery
Response considerations in Active Scanning
Improvement on Active Scanning
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
FILS Association Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address
Fast Authentication in TGai
AP discovery with FILS beacon
MLME.SCAN-request Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
Scanning from Specific Channel
GAS procedure in TGai Date: Authors: Mar 2012 Month Year
Probe Request and Response in TGai
Access Control Mechanism for FILS
AP discovery with FILS beacon
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing the Probe Response transmission
Band adjustment for fasat AP discovery
Listen to Probe Request from other STAs
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Proposed SFD Text for ai Prioritized Active Scanning
Access Control Mechanism for FILS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Access distribution in ai
Fast Authentication in TGai
Access Control Mechanism for FILS
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Fast Authentication in TGai
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Cooperative AP Discovery
Omission of Probe Request
Access distribution in ai
Proposed SFD Text for ai Prioritized Active Scanning
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Scanning from Specific Channel
Fast passive scan for FILS
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
GAS procedure in TGai Date: Authors: May 2012 Month Year
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
MLME.SCAN-request Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
Reducing Probe Responses for faster AP discovery
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai Date: 2012-05-04 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Kiseon Ryu LG Electronics 10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1 (858)-635-5209 kiseon.ryu@lge.com Giwon Park LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye-1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki, 431-749, Korea +82-31-450-1879 giwon.park@lge.com Jinsam Kwak +82-31-450-7902 Jinsam.kwak@lge.com Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Abstract This document proposes enhancement of active scanning by reducing the Probe Response transmission of AP. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Conformance w/ TGai PAR & 5C Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Conformance w/ TGai PAR & 5C Conformance Question Response Does the proposal degrade the security offered by Robust Security Network Association (RSNA) already defined in 802.11? No Does the proposal change the MAC SAP interface? Does the proposal require or introduce a change to the 802.1 architecture? Does the proposal introduce a change in the channel access mechanism? Does the proposal introduce a change in the PHY? Which of the following link set-up phases is addressed by the proposal? (1) AP Discovery (2) Network Discovery (3) Link (re-)establishment / exchange of security related messages (4) Higher layer aspects, e.g. IP address assignment 1 Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Background (1/2) Three kinds of active scanning are defined in the current IEEE802.11 standard Broadcasted Probe Request Containing Wildcard SSID, Wildcard BSSID in Probe Request All APs received Probe Request should respond with Probe Response Unicasted Probe Request Containing SSID, BSSID in Probe Request AP which has the same SSID/BSSID in Probe Request should respond with Probe Response Multicasted Probe Request Containing SSID List, Wildcard BSSID in Probe Request APs of which SSID is one of the SSID List in Probe Request should respond with Probe Response Each method has the following Cons. Probe Response Flooding: Too many Probe Responses may be sent Unicasted/Multicasted Probe Request If there is no APs with desired SSID(s) around STA, delay of active scanning can be increased Therefore, the mechanism to discover the AP with desired SSID needs to be defined without increasing delay of active scanning and Probe Response flooding Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Background (2/2) May 2012 Active Scanning Procedure Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Background (2/2) Active Scanning Procedure Wait until the ProbeDelay time has expired or a PHYRxStart.indication primitive has been received. Perform the Basic Access procedure. Send a probe request to the broadcast destination address, with the SSID and BSSID from the MLME-SCAN.request primitive. When the SSID List is present in the MLME-SCAN.request primitive, send one or more probe request frames, each with an SSID indicated in the SSID List and the BSSID from the MLME-SCAN.request primitive. Set to 0 and start a ProbeTimer. If PHY-CCA.indication (busy) primitive has not been detected before the ProbeTimer reaches MinChannelTime, then set NAV to 0 and scan the next channel, else when ProbeTimer reaches MaxChannelTime, process all received probe responses. Set NAV to 0 and scan the next channel. According to the current active scanning procedure, scanning STA has to monitor the channel for at least MinChannelTime. If any signal is detected in the channel, STA has to monitor the channel till MaxChannelTime has expired. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Proposal For active scanning, two steps of procedure after sending Probe Request (including desired SSID(s) & indication of two step scanning enabled) can be defined STA Perspective First Step STA monitors the channel to receive Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) during the specific time interval (e.g., FirstMinChannelTime) If STA receives Probe Response from the AP(s) with desired SSID, STA may perform the following up procedure such as authentication and association with the AP before MaxChannelTIme has been reached Second Step If STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) within the specific time interval (e.g., FirstMinChannelTime), it monitors the channel to receive Probe Response for non-desired SSID (i.e., wildcard SSID) from all APs near by the STA during the specific time interval (e.g., SecondMinChannelTime) If STA has not received any Probe Response within the certain time interval (e.g., FirstMinChannelTime + SecondMinChannelTime), STA scans the next channel. Otherwise, STA monitors the channel until the ProbeTimer reaches MaxChannelTime, and processes received Probe Responses Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Proposal (Continued) May 2012 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Proposal (Continued) For active scanning, two steps of procedure after sending Probe Request (including desired SSID(s) & indication of two step scanning enabled) can be defined AP Perspective If AP with desired SSID of STA receives the above Probe Request, it responds with Probe Response within the specific time interval (e.g., FirstMinChannelTIme) If AP without desired SSID of STA receives the above Probe Request, it waits for the specific time interval (e.g., FirstMinChannelTIme) and send Probe Response. If AP without desired SSID of STA hears Probe Response sent by the AP with the desired SSID of the STA, it may cancel its transmission of pending Probe Response. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Proposal (Continued) May 2012 Example Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Proposal (Continued) Example If AP without desired SSID of STA receives the above Probe Request, it waits for the specific time duration (e.g., FirstMinChannelTIme) and sends Probe Response. Figure1 . Probe response Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Comparison between the existing procedure and the proposed method Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Comparison between the existing procedure and the proposed method Operational assumption for the existing procedure Single channel operation STA sends the Probe Request including desired SSID(s). When the STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) within the specific time interval (i.e., MinChannelTime), STA sends the Probe Request including Wildcard SSID again after MinChannelTime. Multichannel operation STA sends the Probe Request with desired SSIDs list. If the STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) within the specific time interval (i.e., MinChannelTime), STA scans the next channel(s). If the STA has scanned all channels and has not received any Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s), STA sends the Probe Request with Wildcard SSID again. That is, in case STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with the desired SSID after sending the Probe Request with the specific SSID(s), STA may send the Probe Request with Wildcard SSID again. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Comparison between existing procedure and the proposed method Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Comparison between existing procedure and the proposed method Operational assumption for the proposed method Single channel operation STA sends the Probe Request with desired SSID(s) and the parameter of the specific time interval (i.e., FirstMinChannelTime). If the STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) within the specific time interval (i.e., FirstMinChannelTime), STA monitors the Probe Response sent from the AP with non-desired SSID for the second specific time interval (i.e., SecondMinChannelTime). Multichannel operation When the STA has not received Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID(s) within the specific time interval (i.e., FirstMinChannelTime), STA monitors the Probe Response sent from the AP with non-desired SSID for the second specific time interval (i.e., SecondMinChannelTime). If the STA has not received any Probe Response within the certain time interval (i.e., FirstMinChannelTime + SecondMinChannelTime), STA scans the next channel(s). In proposal, STA just monitors the channel to receive the Probe Response from AP(s) with desired SSID during the FirstMinChannelTime and from AP(s) with non-desired SSID during the SecondMinChannelTime after sending a Probe Request Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Comparison between the existing procedure and the proposal Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Comparison between the existing procedure and the proposal Existing procedure Proposal Case 1) There are only AP with desired SSID near by the STA. Single Probe Request transmission is enough. No additional delay is required. Proposal is equivalent to the existing procedure in the latency & the overhead for active scanning. Case 2) There are only AP (s) for non-desired SSID near by the STA. Two Probe Request transmissions are required for the channel scanning. Delay of active scanning is also increased (i.e., ProbeDelay for second Probe Request transmission). Single Probe Request transmission is enough. Proposal provides less latency & overhead than the existing procedure. Case 3) There is no AP near by the STA. Proposal provides less latency & overhead than the existing procedure Case 4) There are AP(s) with desired SSID and AP for non-desired SSID near by the STA. In the latency perspective, proposal is equivalent to the existing procedure. If cancellation of pending probe response transmission from AP(s) with non-desired SSID is supported, proposal is also equivalent to the existing procedure in the overhead. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Conclusion Proposed step wise active scanning allows STA to discover the AP with desired SSID without increasing delay of active scanning and Probe Response flooding. Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Motion 1 Move to add the following text to the end of the clause 6 of the specification framework document: 802.11ai shall support the prioritized active scanning to reduce the latency of active scanning as well as the overhead of Probe Response. Moved : Seconded: Yes: No: Abstain: Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Motion 2 Move to add the following text to the end of the clause 6 of the specification framework document: Prioritized active scanning allows the STA to select the AP with desired SSID with higher priority over the AP with non-desired SSID. Moved : Seconded: Yes: No: Abstain: Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2012 Motion 3 Move to add the following text to the end of the clause 6 of the specification framework document: After receiving a Probe Request, the AP with non-desired SSID may delay its transmission of Probe Response by the certain time interval as indicated in the received Probe Request. Moved : Seconded: Yes: No: Abstain: Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc. John Doe, Some Company