American Public Power Association Business and Financial Conference Time of Use PricingThe Fundamentals and Applications September 26, 2005 Portland, Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest Dynamic Pricing Program Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest.
Advertisements

Utility Planning Perspective For A Solar Feed In Tariff (FIT) February 3, 2009 Gainesville Regional Utilities.
C HAPTER Elasticity of Demand and Supply price elasticities of demand and supply, income and cross elasticities of demand, and using elasticity to forecast.
Overview of Working Capital Management
Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
Measuring Banking and Insurance: The U.S. Experience Brian C. Moyer Associate Director for Industry Accounts 12 th OECD-NBS Workshop on National Accounts.
Arthur Berger Regional Products and Income Accounts, Beijing, China, March 2010 Canadas Provincial and Territorial Economic Accounts.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Credit Card Traps and PowerPay Debt Reduction Program.
Discussion Topics Overview of Water Rates in California Legal Framework of Water Rates Water Consumption Patterns Empirical Data – City of Fresno The.
CHAPTER 15 Pricing and Credit Decisions
Income Measurement and Profitablity Analysis
What Is Cost Control? 1 Controlling Foodservice Costs OH 1-1.
Copyright © 2001 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Economics THIRD EDITION By John B. Taylor Stanford University.
Foundations of Chapter M A R K E T I N G Copyright © 2003 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Understanding Pricing 13.
Highlights of the 2003 New York ISO State of the Market Report David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor April 14, 2004.
Chapter foundations of Chapter M A R K E T I N G Understanding Pricing 13.
Chapter 10 Project Cash Flows and Risk
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Eleven Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and CVP Analysis.
Inven - Cost - 1Inventory Basic Valuation Methods.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
APPA Business & Financial September Time of Use and EZ-3 Price Plans A Presentation to APPA Business & Financial Conference Savannah, GA September.
25 seconds left…...
Chapter 4: Financial Statement Analysis
Fundamentals of Cost Analysis for Decision Making
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
VCOSS Congress Will the response to the climate debate turn the heat on low income households? Gavin Dufty: Manager Policy and Research Unit St Vincent.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
Jefferson County PUD Preliminary Cost of Service and Rate Design Results December 9, 2014 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
LAKELAND ELECTRIC Pricing to Meet Net Meter Rules APPA 2009 Business & Finance Conference Sept 14, 2009 Jeff Sprague Manager Pricing & Rates.
THE RESPONSE OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS TO ELECTRIC RATES BASED UPON DYNAMIC MARGINAL COSTS BY Joseph A. Herriges, S. Mostafa Baladi, Douglas W. Caves and.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
1 City of Port Angeles Strategic Planning Presentation June 7, 2011 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
NASUCA Annual Meeting Austin, Texas November 10, 2015 Scott J. Rubin, Attorney + Consultant 333 Oak Lane + Bloomsburg, PA Office: (570)
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Talha Mehmood Chapter # 5 TARIFF. Introduction The electrical energy produced by a power station is delivered to a large number of consumers. The supply.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
2015 ElectriCities Advanced Meter School. Rate Design Goals The two primary goals of rate design are to (a)provide rates that lead to utility revenues.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
California Product Offerings
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Beartooth Electric Cooperative Rate Design Analysis
Presentation transcript:

American Public Power Association Business and Financial Conference Time of Use PricingThe Fundamentals and Applications September 26, 2005 Portland, Oregon Presented by: Gary Saleba, President A registered professional engineering corporation with offices in Kirkland, WA; Bellingham, WA; Portland, OR; and Indio, CA Corporate Telephone (425) Facsimile (425)

Agenda Introductions and Session Objectives Time of Use Basics Steps for Determining TOU Rates Examples of TOU Rates Observations on Impacts of TOU Rates Structure of Tariffs in the Future Summary/Conclusion 1

Introductions and Session Objectives n Objectives of Session n Background on Speaker n Disclaimers 2

Time of Use Basics n Why Time Differentiate/the Rationale Higher principal of rate setting is fair, equitable and non- discriminatory Cost based rates are fair, equitable and non-discriminatory Cost based rates must follow cost causation Cost causation requires customer causing costs should also pay Costs vary by time of use Time variant costs should be allocated to users based on who uses what during time variant costing periods (i.e., time of use rates) 3

What are TOU Rates? Time differentiated rates Vary with time of day (TOD) or time of use (TOU) Multiple periods –On-peak period –Off-peak period –Mid or shoulder period 4 Time of Use Basics (contd)

May be seasonally adjusted –Winter –Summer –Monthly May be unbundled –Power supply component –Transmission component –Distribution component Pricing based on the cost of electricity during a particular time block Rates are higher during the peak period and lower than the standard rate during off-peak period because costs vary in same manner 5 Time of Use Basics (contd) Do the functions cost vary by TOU?

Rewards customers for reducing consumption during high price periods/using more during off peak Example for commercial customer: –Customer charge = $50/month –Demand charge = $3/kW/month –Energy charge = On-peak - 5¢/kWh / Off-peak – 2¢/kWh n TOU Rates are Not Real-Time Pricing Real-time pricing differs from TOU pricing in that real time pricing is based on actual (as opposed to forecasted prices) Real-time pricing is more applicable to utilities that purchase a significant portion of power supply at the market Utilities that generate their own power may use TOU pricing to reduce costs Time of Use Basics (contd) 6

n Relative Merits of Time of Use Rates Advantages –Closely tracks costs –Price signal Disadvantages –Metering requirements –Acceptance level by customers –Cost differential between time periods may be small –Administration/billing costs –Impacts on utility net income 7

Time of Use Basics (contd) 8 n Which Type of Costs Vary with Time?

Steps for Determining TOU Rates n Summary Determination of time periods Incorporate time periods into COSA analysis/allocation of costs to time periods Allocate to customer classes Calculate Unit costs by TOU period Calculate TOU rates Data needs 9

n Determination of Time Periods Number of periods should be feasible to administer Hours and months having similar costs should be combined into like groups/look to system lambda or LOLP –Statistical techniques –Wholesale power rates –Eye-ball technique –Other utilities –Market The periods chosen should be broad enough to allow for minor shift in loads without major impacts on revenues n Incorporate Time Periods into COSA Functionalizeno change to standard methodology Classificationneed time period cost classifiers, demand and energy Allocationdemand and energy allocation factors by time period 10 Steps for Determining TOU Rates (contd)

n Classification of Plant and Expenses Timing of peak loads may impact –Power supply investment and expenses –Transmission investment –Distribution investments Power supply investmentlook to causal variable (i.e., LOLP) Power supply O&Mlook to fuel costs Determine if significant difference exists between time periods for transmission and distribution costs 11 Steps for Determining TOU Rates (contd)

n Allocation of Rate Base and Revenue Requirement Take classified costs and allocate to each class of service utilize TOU allocation factors Results in time differentiated costs or revenue requirement by customer class n Calculate Unit Costs Determine time-differentiated unit costs for demand and energy categories Calculate TOU rates based upon unit costs Reasons for deviation from unit costs 12 Steps for Determining TOU Rates (contd)

n Data Requirements for TOU Analysis Load data needed for each class/rate schedule –Energy (kWh) usage by period (on-peak, off-peak, shoulder) –Demand (kW) usage by period (on-peak, off-peak, shoulder) Is the data available? –Metering –Load research –Estimation –Borrow Accounting data –Power supply O&M costs by time period –Power supply capital costs by time period (?) –Transmission costs by time period (?) –Distribution costs by time period (?) 13 Steps for Determining TOU Rates (contd)

n Other Considerations Lack of data Price elasticity impacts Rate continuity Rate stability/revenue shifts Customer understanding 14 Steps for Determining TOU Rates (contd)

Examples of TOU Rates Puget Sound Energys Time-of-Use Program Created in 2000 during the west coast energy crisis to provide financial incentives for customers to shift electric consumption to off- peak times Launched in may ,000 program participants shifted approximately 5 percent of their demand away from peak hours Revised program rates in 2002 to reflect calmer wholesale electricity market; added a $1.00 monthly administration charge to cover incremental meter reading and data handling costs 94% of participants lost an average of 81 cents per month during the third quarter of 2002 compared to standard customers After receiving the disappointing usage summaries in October 2002, approximately 26,000 customers withdrew from the program TOU program was cancelled 10 months ahead of schedule so the company and interested parties could evaluate and possibly re-tool the program 15

Pacific Powers Time-of-Use Programs Required as a result of Oregons electricity restructuring bill that went into effect March 1, 2002 Time-of-use pricing plan requires the installation of a time-of-use meter and a 12-month enrollment commitment PacifiCorp participants pay a $1.50 monthly surcharge and PGE customers pay $1.00 per month to cover a portion of the additional cost for the time-of-use meter, including meter installation charges The first year a customer selects the time-of-use pricing plan, if the total annual energy costs incurred under the time-of-use exceeds 10% over what costs would have been for the same period under standard rate, the net difference, guarantee payment, will be credited on the customers bill following the last month of the initial one-year commitment 16 Examples of TOU Rates (contd)

PGEs Oregon Time-of-Use Programs PGE rate structure –3 tiers: on-peak, mid-peak and off-peak –Mid-peak equals the standard service rate –Ratio of on- to off-peak rates roughly 3-to-1 or near 5¢/kWh –Customers pay a surcharge on top of inclining block rates for usage during on-peak hours and get a credit during off-peak hours –On-peak surcharge is twice as high from April through October Results of PGE study show that time-of-use households used 292 kWh less energy and saved $28 (or 5 percent) per year on average Enrollment statistics as of March 2005 –1,367 or 0.3% of Pacific Powers 517,000 residential customers –1,998 or 0.3% of PGEs 742,555 residential customers 17 Examples of TOU Rates (contd)

n Southern California Edison Time-of-Use Programs TOU programs are available for residential, commercial and industrial customer classes Standard TOU and new critical peak pricing For the residential class, TOU pricing only occurs in the generation component of the rate For the remaining rate schedules, both the distribution and generation components have time related components n SCE – Residential 2 tiers: on-peak and off-peak for each session Ratio of on- to off-peak rates roughly 3-to-1 or near 20¢/kWh on peak SCE charges an additional TOU meter charge of 0.09 cents ($2.70/month) per meter per day in addition to the standard customer charge, an increase of approximately 35% 18 Examples of TOU Rates (contd)

n Commercial and Industrial Programs Three tiers (on-peak, mid-peak and off-peak) Both generation and distribution rates include time related components n Enrollment Statistics as of March ,127 or 0.1% of SCEs 3,987,127 residential customers 21,836 or 3.4% of SCEs 634,941 commercial & industrial customers 19 Examples of TOU Rates (contd)

20 Source: Orange & Rockland, Residential TOU Rate (NY) n Example of TOU Delivery Charge Examples of TOU Rates (contd)

21 Source: Orange & Rockland, Residential TOU Rate (NY) Examples of TOU Rates (contd) n Example of TOU Delivery Charge

Observations on Impacts of TOU Rates n Success of TOU Programs Depends On: Price of power Design of the program n PSE Program Was Not Successful Price differential not significant enough Expensive to participate n Studies in CA Have Shown that: Residential customers will reduce peak load by approximately 5% given on-peak TOU rates approximately double the standard rate Residential customers will reduce peak load by approximately 15% given on-peak CPP rates approximately 5 times the standard rate n PSEs Program also Reduced Peak Demands by Approximately 5% 22

n Commercial TOU Customers Reduce Demands by 2% - 10% Due to TOU Rates n Industrial TOU Customers Reduce Demands by 4% - 25% Due to TOU Rates n Online Energy Management Systems are Likely to Increase the Demand Response 23 Observations on Impacts of TOU Rates (contd)

Structure of Tariffs in the Future n Continuing Price Volatility Under Deregulation as Supply/Demand Balance Vacillates n Price and Availability of Advanced Meters Better (AMR) n Increased Education of Customers/Up the Learning Curve n Results in More Complex Time Differentiated Tariffs n For the Future: Dynamic Pricing Critical peak pricing tariffs Real-time pricing Day ahead tariffs n Assumes Resources are Periodically Scarce and Deregulation Continues to Evolve 24

Summary/Conclusion n Grandpa Salebaisms If it aint broke, dont fix it 25

Summary/Conclusion (contd) n Grandpa Salebaisms If it aint broke, dont fix it Never have time to do it right but always have time to do it over 26

Summary/Conclusion (contd) n Grandpa Salebaisms If it aint broke, dont fix it Never have time to do it right but always have time to do it over Better to be roughly right than precisely wrong 27