ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Zhiyu Li, Alfonso Mondragón, Russell J DiGate  Molecular Cell 
The DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
Jerzy Majka, Anita Niedziela-Majka, Peter M.J. Burgers  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
Hector Aldaz, Eugene Schuster, Tania A Baker  Cell 
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Jonathan P Staley, Christine Guthrie  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages (September 2000)
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Domain Interactions in E
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein Blocks the 5′ Splice Site-Dependent Assembly of U2AF and the Prespliceosomal E Complex  Shalini Sharma, Arnold M.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
DNA Looping and Catalysis
Rita Das, Zhaolan Zhou, Robin Reed  Molecular Cell 
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Synthetic Chromatin Acylation by an Artificial Catalyst System
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes Briana M Burton, Tanya L Williams, Tania A Baker  Molecular Cell  Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 449-454 (August 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00307-0

Figure 1 ClpX Catalyzes Unfolding of MuA (A) Mass spectrum of native MuA (H-MuA, average mass of 75,073 Da) and deuterated MuA (D-MuA, average mass of 75,740 Da). The calculated masses are 75,003 and 75,816 Da (gray line), respectively. Deuterated MuA incubated with ClpX and ATP for 1 hr (D-MuA + ClpX) has a final most abundant mass of 75,159 Da. The dotted line indicates the maximum exchange possible (mass of 75,149 Da) since the reaction buffer contained 20% deuterium. (B) Time course of deuterium-hydrogen exchange for deuterated MuA incubated in ClpX and ATP (squares) or ClpX-buffer and ATP (circles). Each point is the average of three dataset collections, each from two independent preparations of the same deuterated sample. The dotted line represents the maximal theoretical exchange achievable given that the reaction buffer contained 20% deuterium. (C) Quantitation of a time course of transpososome destabilization. Complex remodeling was assayed by gel-mobility shift. A representative gel is shown (inset; C, complexes; D, free DNA). Data plotted are averaged from three experiments (circles). The dotted line represents the D/H exchange curve in the presence of ClpX from (B), superimposed here as remaining unexchanged (%) for comparison Molecular Cell 2001 8, 449-454DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00307-0)

Figure 2 ClpX Unfolds Transposase Subunits during Remodeling Reactions (A) Assembled transpososomes on plasmids (lane 1) were challenged with high salt and were isolated by gel filtration. The resulting purified complexes (lane 2) were then treated with ClpX and ATP and again gel filtered. At each stage, samples were run (1) on a native agarose gel to visualize the DNA and asses the stability of the complexes and (2) on an SDS-PAGE to verify the presence of MuA in DNA-containing fractions by immunoblotting. The final panel shows that the ClpX-remodeled complexes are unstable to electrophoresis, but still contain most of the MuA protein (lanes 5-8). The (*) and (•) represent unreacted supercoiled and relaxed DNA, respectively. (B) GroELD87K was used to probe unfolding of MuA by ClpX. The immunoblot shows fractions from gradient sedimentation of intramolecular strand-transfer complexes composed of full-length MuA purified away from free MuA subunits and then treated with ClpX and ATP in the presence of GroELD87K. Greater than 60% of the MuA sedimented with GroELD87K. The anti-MuA antibody crossreacts with GroELD87K Molecular Cell 2001 8, 449-454DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00307-0)

Figure 3 MuA Subunits Lacking a ClpX Recognition Signal Remain Native through the Remodeling Process (A) Schematic of the experimental procedure. (B) SYPRO Orange-stained gel (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) of gradient fractions. (C) Quantitation of the amount of 32P-MuA77–605 in each fraction. The ability of GroELD87K to efficiently trap chemically denatured MuA77–605 was verified Molecular Cell 2001 8, 449-454DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00307-0)

Figure 4 A Single ClpX-Recognition Sequence Is Sufficient for Transpososome Destabilization (A) Schematic of the domain structure of Mu transposase. Divisions are based on protease-sensitive sites (Nakayama et al., 1987). The active site mutations in MuA77–605 DE/NQ are D269N and E392Q. (B) Schematic of the isolation procedure adopted from Williams et al. (1999). Complexes capable of cleavage off a neutravidin matrix must have the subunit with a functional active site subunit bound to the DNA fragment that is in trans to the biotinylated DNA fragment. (C) Wild-type complexes and complexes biased to carry a single recognition sequence were isolated as depicted in (B) and analyzed for destabilization by ClpX. Complexes cleaved off the neutravidin matrix are shown in lanes 1 and 3, and the same cleaved complexes incubated with ClpX and ATP are shown in lanes 2 and 4. Complexes composed entirely of MuA77–605 subunits were assembled and diluted to a similar concentration as those that were cleaved off the neutravidin beads for the other experiments (lane 5) and assessed for destabilization by ClpX (lane 6). Therefore, these complexes were not purified away from free DNA. Native agarose gels were run in the presence of heparin. (D) Aliquots of the samples from (C) lanes 1–4 were run on native gels lacking heparin to allow for visualization of weaker DNA binding. The intermediate bands (*) between the complexes and the free DNA correspond to a nonsynapsed band-shifted complex of MuA bound to the Mu end fragment Molecular Cell 2001 8, 449-454DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00307-0)