K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1992, At What resolution are there real biological differences.
Advertisements

O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences,
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Results and discussion Results and Discussion Figure 3. Observed (symbols) and simulated (lines) V-Stages of soybean cultivars (MG 3.0 to 3.9) grown at.
Indirect Measurement of Plant Height in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Pam Turner Oklahoma State University.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Sensor Technology in India R.K. Gupta, B. Singh, P. Chandna, R.K. Sharma, M.L. Jat.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
Using Sonar and Digital Imagery To Estimate Crop Biomass Introduction Sonar: may be used to detect proximity and distance in machine vision (Senix 2003)
Remote Sensing to Estimate Chlorophyll Concentration Using Multi-Spectral Plant Reflectance P. R. Weckler Asst. Professor M. L. Stone Regents Professor.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Precision Planting of Corn (Zea mays L.) to Manipulate Leaf Geometry Guilherme Torres Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
NDVI: What It Is and What It Measures Danielle Williams.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
AJ Foster Soils 4213 Spring AJ Foster, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production K.L. Martin, P.J. Hodgen, K.W. Freeman, Ricardo Melchiori, D.B. Arnall, R.K. Teal, R.W. Mullen, K. Desta,
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Variable Rate Technology in Wheat
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Weekly NDVI Relationships to Height, Nodes and Productivity Index for Low, Medium, and High Cotton Productivity Zones T. Sharp, G. Evans and A. Salvador.
Eric Miller, Jacob Bushong, and Bill Raun NUE Conference August 6 th, 2013.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Cotton Sensor Research Update
Development of a Response Index for Corn
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Precision Sensing Extension Workshop January 8, 2008
Estimationg rice growth parameters using X-band scatterometer data
Determining the Optimum Growth Window for NDVI Sensing in Order to Predict Yield in Winter Wheat in the United States Grain Belt Melissa Golden April 23,
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Yield Potential, 2007
History of Predicting Yield Potential
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Utilizing Indicator crop N-rich strips for anticipating pre plant and side dress Nitrogen rates for maize. Rationale Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Crop Spec, A Collaborative Partnership
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
YP0 = (NDVI / Days, GDD>0) YP0 = INSEY YPN = (YP0*RI)
Presentation transcript:

K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie By-Plant Prediction of Corn Forage Biomass and Grain Yield at Various Growth Stages using NDVI and Plant Height K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie

Introduction Stone el al., 1996 found that N uptake could be predicted in winter wheat using NDVI. Varvel et al., 1997 noted that corn N status could be monitored using chlorophyll meters. Muchado et al., 2002 stated that in dry years, plant height can explain 90% and 61% of the variation of total dry and grain yield, respectively.

Introduction

Introduction Prediction of Corn Forage Biomass Avenue for predicting final grain yield Estimate Corn Silage in the Field Prediction of Corn Forage N Uptake Prediction of Corn Grain Yield Ability to predict corn grain yield will help to prescribe N rates mid-season These rates can be predicted on a by-plant basis

Objective To determine the feasibility of by-plant sensor data collected at various stages of corn development for predicting corn forage biomass, N uptake, and corn grain yield.

Methods INSEY_DFP = NDVI / Days from Planting to Sensing INSEY_GDD = NDVI / Cumulative GDD from Planting to Sensing GDD = (Tempmin + Tempmax /2) – 40 Regression analysis performed using an exponential model

Methods A GreenSeeker Sensor was mounted on a bicycle A shaft encoder was used to assign distance to each sensor reading Readings were taken once per centimeter

Methods Plant Height measurements were taken at each sensor reading and clipping Heights were measured by extending the last collared leaf upright

Methods 1 2 3 10cm 30cm Area Calculation for Plant 2  Area = ½(10) + ½(30)* Row Spacing Then, Area = (15 cm + 5cm)* 76cm= 1520 cm2

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Results

Conclusions Blah blah blah

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain Yield with Sensor Reading taken from V8-R6 Growth Stages in 2004

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Forage N Uptake at V8-V11 Growth Stage using NDVI in 2003 & 2004

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Forage N uptake at V8-V11 Growth Stage using Plant Height in 2003 & 2004

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Forage N Uptake at V8-V11 Growth Stage using NDVI*Height in 2003 & 2004