WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advertisements

Pre-Answer Motions. 12(b)(1) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Should have been in state rather than federal court 12(b)(2) Personal Jurisdiction This court.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
1 As of April 2014 Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
WHERE WE ARE Complaint Answer 12(b) Motions Amended Pleadings Pre-Trial Trial & Post-Trial Appeal Reply.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal.
WHERE WE ARE Complaint Answer 12(b) Motions Amended Pleadings Pre-Trial Trial & Post-Trial Appeal.
SJ MOTIONS The Paperwork The Caption & the Cause Number The court’s filing system The Record The only facts the judge considers What the lawyers provide.
Law 11 Introduction. 2 Sources of American Law o Constitutions – federal plus every state; everyone in U.S. subject to federal constitution plus one state.
Introduction to Civil Procedure in the United States Wake Forest LLM Introduction to American Law Alan R. Palmiter – Sep
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Litigation Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States
Practice Direction 6 Revisited Damian Gordon Barrister at Law.
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
WHERE WE ARE Complaint Answer 12(b) Motions Amended Pleadings Pre-Trial Trial & Post-Trial Appeal Reply.
Trials and Resolving Disputes
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
AMERICAN DISCOVERY FOR FOREIGN LITIGATION. The Federal statute:28 USC 1782(a) “The district court of the district in which a person resides of is found.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC 217 F.R.D. 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), 236 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Proposed and Recent Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Rules of Discovery  State  Federal.
Understanding Business and Personal Law The Court System Chapter 4 The Court System What You’ll Learn How disputes can be settled without the courts.
3/10/ The Federal Court System: An Introductory Guide For Mr. Brady’s Awesome Class.
COMPLAINTS & ANSWERS Consistency in Pleading Complaints Pleading “in the alternative” permitted Alternative theories of recovery Answers Deny + Affirmative.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 CLASS 3 (8/29/03) STAGES AND ESSENTIAL CONCEPTS OF A CIVIL ACTION Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor.
Resolution of Fraud FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 16.
The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.
Resolving Health Care Disputes
Chapter 3 The U.S. Legal System Chapter 3: The U.S. Legal System
V. SOURCES OF LAW APPLICABLE TO FLORIDA CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION
‘Make in India’ series Emerging Trends - International Arbitration: (i) E- discovery (ii) Hot tubbing.
Federal Rules Update Effective Dec. 1, 2015.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Chapter 4 Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute
How Civil Procedure allows for FAT
The Civil Court Procedure
Chapter 3 The American Judicial System, Jurisdiction, and Venue
The Trial Process What is the adversarial system and how does it work? Does it serve the interests of justice? What are the major components of a trial?
The Future of Discovery Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
THE LOOK BEFORE THE LEAP
Court Structure, Role of Precedent and Stare Decisis
Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law
Let’s Begin w/ the Basics
Resolving Health Care Disputes
Why is this an essential component of the Constitution?
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING
Anatomy of a Lawsuit 1/17/2019.
The Trial Process What is the adversarial system and how does it work? Does it serve the interests of justice? What are the major components of a trial?
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING
RULE 11 Terminology Big theme “Satellite litigation”
The difference between original and appellate jurisdiction.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Courts and Court Systems
Judicial Powers of Case Management
Presentation transcript:

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Knowledge is power Discovery = Access to knowledge

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Discovery What is it? Role in modern litigation?

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Pleading Pre-trial Discovery Resolution without Trial Trial & Post-trial Appeal

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Big themes Avoiding “trial by ambush” Access to courts Speed Low-cost v. “Accurate” decisions Controlling strategic behavior Lawyer job satisfaction

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Federal Rules Amendments 1970 1983 1993 2000 Causes & consequences System under stress Crumbling consensus Compromises Rule Complexity

DISCOVERY FR 26(b) Discovery Scope & Limits Parties may obtain discovery of any matter not privileged relevant to the claim or defense of any party

DISCOVERY FR 26(b) Discovery Scope & Limits For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action

DISCOVERY Relevance & Privilege Why did ct find broad discovery request Relevant in Blank v. Sullivan & Cromwell? Irrelevant in Steffan v. Cheney?

DISCOVERY Relevance Blank v. Sullivan & Cromwell, Supp. 417 Info sought Method Steps to resist Def’s argument Ct’s response

DISCOVERY Relevance Steffan v. Cheney, Supp. p. 418 Info sought Method Steps to resist Trial Ct’s response Why def thinks relevant? Why D.C. Cir. thinks irrelevant? “Scope of review”

APPELLATE REVIEW Scope of review How did Steffan reach appellate court?

DISCOVERY Relevance Johnson Matthey, Inc. Supp. p. 422 Info sought Method Steps to resist FR 26(b)(1) Standard for discoverability

DISCOVERY Relevance Relevance isn’t abstract concept Information relevant to Claim (elements?) Defenses Subject matter of action

TAKEAWAYS Black Letter Law (the “gist”) FR 26(b) (1) Discovery scope 2 stages As of right “relevant to … claim or defense” Court’s discretion “relevant to … subject matter”

TAKEAWAYS “The Law is a seamless web” Civ Pro discovery rules depend on Law of evidence Law governing claims/defenses