Patch Testing HYPACK 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SINGLE BEAM EDITING HYPACK
Advertisements

HYSWEEP® HARDWARE.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Retractable Bow Mounted Transducer
Microsoft Excel. Click on “Start,” then “Microsoft Office Excel.”
A1 Acoustic Rhinometer The following presentation gives an overview of the main functions of the A1Acoustic Rhinometer, it’s accessories and normal operational.
HYSWEEP® SURVEY HYPACK 2013.
RD Instruments Home of the ADCP Measuring Water in Motion and Motion in Water THETIS Waves Data QA RD Instruments Home of the ADCP.
ADCP Compass Calibrations
PATCH TEST HYPACK ® MULTIBEAM COURSE
Review and Rating Discharge Measurements David S. Mueller Office of Surface Water March 2010.
HYPACK MULTIBEAM COURSE
Note if in doubt click the “Help” button
TOWFISH DRIVER.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
EVA Magician for Injection Molding of EVA Shoe Soles.
European Computer Driving Licence Syllabus version 5.0 Module 4 – Spreadsheets Chapter 22 – Functions Pass ECDL5 for Office 2007 Module 4 Spreadsheets.
 Starting Excel 2003  Using Help  Workbook Management  Cursor Management  Manipulating Data  Using Formulae and Functions  Formatting Spreadsheet.
Performance Testing What can you achieve with your MB System?
Optical Manufacturing Solutions 1 FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS BELOW AFTER INSTALLING A NEW CUTTER BODY WITH POLISHING WHEELS INTO THE 7E TYPE MACHINES. IT IS.
LC and SMBA Updates Office of Surface Water Hydroacoustics Webinar January 6 and 9, 2008 David S. Mueller.
HYSWEEP® PATCH TESTING.
PowerPoint Basics Tutorial 3: Graphics In this tutorial we’ll be looking at graphics, and the various types of illustrations that can be included in a.
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Vertical Uncertainty Total Propagated Error –Error budget using Excel spreadsheets created for NAVOCEANO by Rob.
Mercury G3 Service Tool Training Overview When opening G3 you will start at this screen first import thing to look for is communication.
TIME TAGGING. HYPACK ® Timing Basics  The internal clock on your computer is a lousy clock.  HYPACK SURVEY and DREDGEPACK ® use a proprietary clock.
1 NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OFFICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DIVISION N612 ENGINEERING ROLE IN NAVOCEANO SHIP’S ENVIRONMENT Procurement of New Systems. Configuration.
How is a Patch Test performed
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 3 Setting Up A Document.
MC3D V1.1 - Match-Cast 3D Geometry Control Software
A1 Acoustic Rhinometer The following presentation gives an overview of the main functions of the A1Acoustic Rhinometer, it’s accessories and normal operational.
The Larsen Autoblocker Calibrating Your System for Maximum Productivity and Quality.
2D Guidance for Excavators on the 3D Display. Configuring a 2D Hex Machine If this was a 2D only display you would only see “Depth and Slope”
Bryce Hutchinson & Sumit Verma
Autodesk Inventor Autodesk Inventor EdgeCAM – Part 2 EdgeCAM – Part 2 CNC Motion CNC Motion Prolight CNC Mill Prolight CNC Mill CNC Box.
SINGLE BEAM EDITING HYPACK
HYSWEEP® Overview.
DREDGEPACK® Basics.
SIDE SCAN HARDWARE CONFIGURATION
SIDE SCAN SURVEY 1. Sidescan Survey Window for Display and control (1) Title Area – Will display file name with HSX extension. (2) Alarm Indicators:
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
3D TERRAIN VIEWER: Basics HYPACK D Terrain Viewer (3DTV)
HYSWEEP® SURVEY.
HYSWEEP® HARDWARE.
HYSWEEP® Overview.
HYSWEEP ® HARDWARE. HYSWEEP ® Survey Configuring a Multibeam System Multibeam sonar GPS (via HYPACK hardware) Motion sensor Heading sensor Dynamic Draft.
HYSWEEP ® HARDWARE. HYSWEEP ® Survey Configuring a Multibeam System Multibeam sonar GPS (via HYPACK hardware) Motion sensor Heading sensor Dynamic Draft.
EXCAVATORS. Excavator.dll : General Settings Contains:  Excavator Dimensions  System Override Values  Useful when a sensor fails  Sensor Adjustments.
HYPACK HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. HYPACK ® HARDWARE: Combined HYPACK HARDWARE, HYSWEEP HARDWARE & SIDE SCAN HARDWARE are now combined in a single HYPACK.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
SIDE SCAN HARDWARE CONFIGURATION HYPACK Connection Block Diagram GPS, single beam and tide data go into HYPACK ® SURVEY. Sidescan (with optional.
MATRIX FILES IN SURVEY. Sample of AutoMTX Display in SURVEY. The Auto Matrix (AutoMTX) feature in HYPACK only works with multibeam systems. Based on your.
TOPOGRAPHIC LASERS. Laser Collection in HYSWEEP  LIDAR collection is a standard feature of HYSWEEP ®.  Process with MBMAX64 alone or alongside bathymetric.
SIDE SCAN TARGETING AND MOSAICKING. Mosaic Data Flow HYSWEEP SURVEY SIDE SCAN SURVEY SIDE SCAN MOSAIC PROGRAM (HYSCAN) HSX HSX Side Scan Data TIF TIF.
1 James N. Bellinger Robert Handler University of Wisconsin-Madison 11-Monday-2009 Laser fan non-linearity James N. Bellinger 20-March-2009.
SIDE SCAN SURVEY 1. Sidescan Survey Window for Display and control (1) Title Area (1) Title Area – Will display file name with HSX extension. (2) Alarm.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
Guidelines for building a bar graph in Excel and using it in a laboratory report IB Biology (December 2012)
EXCAVATORS.
CUTTER SUCTION DREDGES. Cutter Suction Configuration Cutter Suction Configuration ` Water Level Chart Datum Channel Design Depth Channel Design Overdepth.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Example Problem #2 Maxwell 2D Hall Sensor. T7_3D, pg. 2 7/21/02 Hall Sensor Description: The Hall sensor works similarly to the vr sensor, except that.
GEOCODER. Developed by Dr. Luciano Fonseca, formerly of UNH-CCOM Licensed as a standard feature in HYPACK ® (HYPACK MAX, OFFICE, ACOUSTIC and HYSWEEP.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
MATRIX FILES IN SURVEY.
How to annotate your Audacity project
Agilent Technologies – Installation Training
Mesh Morph 2.0 Tutorial 7/29/2019.
Presentation transcript:

Patch Testing HYPACK 2013

Calibration of a Multibeam System HYSWEEP® Calibration of a Multibeam System Pat asked to include USACE regs. for patch testing. I don’t see them here. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Also: Patch Testing Laser Scanners.

Multibeam Patch Testing A Patch Test Determines Correction to Roll mounting angle. Correction to Pitch mounting angle. Correction to Yaw mounting angle. GPS Latency (time delay). Bad roll calibration resulting in a 6’ vertical difference in the outside beams USACE Requirements for Patch Testing (EM1110-2-1003) Patch tests are performed after initial installation, and periodically thereafter if sensors are modified, to quantify any residual biases from the initial system alignment.

Alignment Errors Roll: Pitch: Yaw: Sonar and MRU alignment relative to horizontal. Causes large depth errors at outer beams. Pitch: Sonar and MRU alignment relative to horizontal. Causes depth and position errors across the swath. Yaw: Sonar and Gyro alignment relative to boat frame. Causes position errors.

GPS Latency Error Latency: Is Latency testing required? Delay between position fix and sounding data arrival time. Can cause positional errors Error is independent of multibeam system. Is Latency testing required? Hardly Ever. Positioning systems and most newer Multibeam systems, both send data with UTC time tags that remove latency. Available as a “reality check”. 5

Patch Test Location Roll Test: Latency, Pitch and Yaw Tests: Look for an area that is reasonably flat. Along the center of a dredged channel should be OK. Anchorages are good too. Latency, Pitch and Yaw Tests: Look for an area with variable bottom terrain. The side slope of a dredged channel will work. A flowing current may make this difficult to stay on line. Pipeline crossings are excellent! Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. The entire patch test can be done right here.

Survey Lines – Single Head Roll Test: Line A-B. Reciprocal lines, flat bottom, survey speed. Pitch Test: Line C-D. Reciprocal lines, variable bottom, survey speed. Yaw Test: Lines C-D and E-F. Offset lines, same direction, variable bottom, survey speed. Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. Latency Test: Line C-D. Same direction, variable bottom, high speed then low speed. 7

Pitch, Yaw and Latency Tests over a Slope Survey Lines – Single Head Pitch, Yaw and Latency Tests over a Slope Pitch Test: Line C-D. Reciprocal lines, variable bottom, survey speed. Yaw Test: Lines C-D and E-F. Offset lines, same direction, variable bottom, survey speed. Separation = Mid Depth = (Top of Slope + Bottom of Slope ) / 2. Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. Latency Test: Line C-D. Same direction, variable bottom, high speed then low speed. 8

Survey Lines – Dual Head Roll Test Different line geometry to overlap port and starboard heads separately. Requires 3 survey lines instead of 2. Lines A and B overlap starboard head. Lines B and C overlap port head. Some dual head systems in engineered mounting frames can be treated as single head. Check with the sonar company. Pitch, Yaw and Latency Tests Some engineered frames can be treated as single head. Others can not. Check with the sonar company for their procedures. Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. Overlap: Green = Port Head. Red = Starboard Head. 9

Survey Lines – Laser Scanner The best patch area is a parking lot with light posts! Line pairs A-C or B-D can be compared for all alignments: roll, pitch and yaw. If your boat isn’t trailerable, you will need something similar on the water. Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. Parking lot survey lines HYPACK® data from Optech ILRIS scanning laser. 10

Some Things to Avoid Avoid Patch Testing with Bad positioning Use RTK GPS whenever possible. Assuming 3’ DGPS shift in 40’ of water Latency Test: +/- 0.4 seconds. Pitch Test: +/- 4.4 degrees. Yaw Test: +/- 4.3 degrees. Avoid Patch Testing in Very Shallow Water Patch testing becomes more reliable as the water gets deeper. Test in the deepest area available. Do not view Patch Testing as EXACT! See DGPS uncertainties above. Run each test at least twice to confirm results. Multiple tests will be averaged in post processing. Nice graphic! Line separation? 1x depth at shallow end as you stated in another slide? 1½ x depth?—I thought that’s what Pat said. 11

Patch Test Processing In MBMAX32 Starting the Patch Test Load survey lines in pairs (the two ‘Pitch’ test lines for example). Edit through to Area Based Editing. Auto cell size in Matrix Setup works well. Starting the Patch Test The Patch Test works against a cross section cut through the survey lines. Use “Wrench” icon to manually cut the section. Roll section: Across track, flat area. Pitch section: Along track, over nadir. Yaw Section: Along track, half way between lines. Latency section: Along track, over nadir. Added GPS latency also to HYPACK® Hardware.

How It Works Numerical Method The cross sections are calculated at various angle offsets. For example; pitch offset from -10 to 10 degrees at one degree steps. An error value is calculated at each offset. Error = average depth difference between cross sections. Minimum error is usually the correct offset. But not always! Added GPS latency also to HYPACK® Hardware. Good Fit Cross sections overlay well. Error is at the minimum point. Poor Fit Cross sections overlay poorly. Large error. 13

Patch Test Window – Part 1 Results Read test results here. Select Test Pick the tab corresponding to the test you want to run. Select Sonar Head For dual head systems, select head 1 or 2 Control Modify Test Settings Error Graph X axis is angle or time adjustment. Y axis is the error; difference between cross sections. Cross Sections Red is the first line, green is the second. Added GPS latency also to HYPACK® Hardware. Override Select Next or Previous adjustment. Vertical Adjustment Moves the first line up or down if needed. 14

Patch Test Window – Part 2 Patch Test History Average Results with Uncertainty. Use the average instead of the individual tests. Survey Information Comments from the data files. Step Selections Default Angle / Time Steps. Can be over-ridden in the Control section. Coarse: Use this to get ‘close’. Medium: Usually appropriate for DGPS. Fine: Usually appropriate for RTK GPS. Save Test Saves test result in an RTF document. Added GPS latency also to HYPACK® Hardware. 15

Example: MB Roll Tests Single Head Dual Head Patch Test Section is cut across track. Angle step of 0.1 degree. Can go to 0.05 or better. Good overlap in cross sections. Good “U-Shaped” error curve. Dual Head Across track section. In this example, different result are seen for heads 1 and 2. “Decent” sounds subjective…maybe “clear” , “clean” or “distinct”? Roll Test Head 1 Roll Test Head 2 16

Example: MB Pitch/Yaw Tests Pitch Test Patch Test Section is cut directly over nadir. Good overlap, good error curve. Angle step of 1.0 degrees using DGPS. Better resolution if RTK. Yaw Test Patch Test Section is cut half way between track lines. Good overlap, good error curve. Angle step of 1.0 degrees using DGPS. Better resolution if RTK. “Decent” sounds subjective…maybe “clear” , “clean” or “distinct”? 17

Example: Laser Scanner Patch Test Cross Sections: Roll Test: Cut test section across track over the pavement. Pitch and Yaw Tests: Cut test section along track over the pole. May be hard to get a good U-shaped error curve. Use Next/Previous to adjust manually. Roll Test: Adjustment to match up pavement cross sections. “Decent” sounds subjective…maybe “clear” , “clean” or “distinct”? Pitch Test: Adjustments to make the pole vertical. Yaw Test: Adjustments to align the base of the pole. 18

Testing Order and Repetition Order of Processing makes a Difference Find the Latency offset first. (If Latency Test is necessary.) Apply latency, then do the Pitch test. Apply pitch, then do the Roll test. Apply roll, then finish with the Yaw test. Do It Again! After finding initial results, repeat the testing. Use the same order – Pitch, then Roll, then Yaw. The second run gives tighter results. “Decent” sounds subjective…maybe “clear” , “clean” or “distinct”? 19

Results Test Results (from the Patch Test window) Some Error Curves Good. Not as Good. U-shaped error curve is preferred. But not always possible. Test Results (from the Patch Test window) Adjustment: Patch test change to initial offset. Initial Offset: Offset before patch test. (From HYSWEEP® Hardware.) Final Offset: Offset after Patch Test. To be included in average for update to HYSWEEP® Hardware. “Decent” sounds subjective…maybe “clear” , “clean” or “distinct”? 20

Sample Single Head Patch Test