3rd Workshop on dynamic fuel cycle Timothée Kooyman, DEN,DR,SPRC,LE2C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resistive bulks industrialization Status report 2 OCTOBER 2012 Fabien Jeanneau | PAGE 1 RD51 Collaboration meeting | Stony Brook University | October 2012.
Advertisements

Getting the LFTR Off The Ground Paul Houle Computational Physics For Liquid-Fueled Thorium Reactors.
Augustus Merwin Presented to the National Security Forum
ThEC13 Daniel Mathers The Thorium Fuel Cycle ThEC13 Daniel Mathers
HT 2005T8: Chain Reaction1 Chain Reaction Multiplication Criticality Conditions.
Sustainable Energy Security from Fast Breeder Reactors
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
Yacine Kadi Thorium Energy Conference 2013 Globe of Innovation, CERN, Switzerland October 31, 2013.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Fundamentals of Neutronics : Reactivity Coefficients in Nuclear Reactors Paul Reuss Emeritus Professor at the Institut National des Sciences et Techniques.
USE OF VVER SPENT FUELS IN A THORIUM FAST BREEDER P. Vértes, KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary 17 th AER Symposium Yalta,
Environment Institute Where ideas grow atomexpo 2013 forum: “Nuclear energy and public acceptance”, Saint Petersburg, 28 June 2013 Plentiful Energy – key.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Dr. Okan Zabunoğlu Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
ENDORSING RADIATION PROTECTION IN ACADEMIA AND UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS Egypte workshop | Akli HAMMADI | PAGE 1 CEA | 10 AVRIL.
Antineutrino Monitoring of Reactors Theoretical Feasibility Studies Antineutrino Monitoring of Reactors Theoretical Feasibility Studies Michael Nieto,
13 DECEMBRE 2012 | PAGE 1 Clays In Natural And Engineered Barriers For Radioactive Waste Confinement - march 23-25, octobre 2015 | PAGE 1 CEA |
THE WEST PROJECT AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AT CEA-IRFM 24/09/2012ADAS WORKSHOP | PAGE 1 CEA | 10 AVRIL 2012 R. Guirlet, J. Bucalossi, M. Firdaouss, Y. Marandet,
Synergistic Relationships of Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles Jordan Weaver Technology Report Presentation.
3. Core Layout The core loading pattern for the proliferation resistant advanced transuranic transmuting design (PRATT) was optimized to obtain an even.
1 Massimo SALVATORESiemtp 8 – November th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation University.
1 Nuclear Energy Division MIT Report on the Future of Nuclear Power in the United-States : review and discussion Eric Proust Director, Industrial Affairs.
Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors Martin W. Metzner November 19, 2007.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Actinide Evolution and Equilibrium in Fast Thorium Reactors UNTF 2010 University.
Rouanet Maxime.The confining matrice : how to protect the world to radiations of high-activity radioactive waste.
Advanced Heavy Water Reactor Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA.
Kayla J. Sax MPhil Candidate in Engineering Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge Supervised by Dr. Geoff T. Parks Investigating the Scope.
Characteristics of Transmutation Reactor Based on LAR Tokamak Neutron Source B.G. Hong Chonbuk National University.
Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors.
Potential role of FF hybrids Massimo Salvatores CEA-Cadarache- France Fusion-Fission Hybrids have a potential role (in principle and independently from.
1/12 VUJE, Inc., Okružná 5, SK Trnava, Slovakia Plutonium and MA Management in VVER-440 and FR P. Dařílek, R. Zajac – VUJE Trnava
1 FRENCH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION (CEA) - NUCLEAR ENERGY DIVISION Nuclear Data Needs, SG26, NEA data bank, 3 May 2006CEA/DER Cadarache Centre Gérald Rimpault.
2016 January1 Nuclear Options for the Future B. Rouben McMaster University EP4P03_6P03 Nuclear Power Plant Operation 2016 January-April.
INTERFACES MANAGEMENT CRYOMODULES Vincent HENNION SYSTEM ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK 3 rd Year PhD student Actinide Breeding and Reactivity Variation in a Thermal.
ESS CRYOMODULE RISKS REGISTER ESS CRYOMODULE COMPONENTS AND CAVITY EXPERTISE Franck PEAUGER14th January 2016.
Process modelling and optimization aid FONTEIX Christian Professor of Chemical Engineering Polytechnical National Institute of Lorraine Chemical Engineering.
Adonai Herrera-Martínez, Yacine Kadi, Geoff Parks, Vasilis Vlachoudis High-Level Waste Transmutation: Thorium Cycle vs Multi-Tier Strategy.
NEAR-COMPLETE TRANSURANIC WASTE INCINERATION IN THORIUM-FUELLED LIGHT WATER REACTORS Ben Lindley.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Actinide Evolution and Equilibrium in Thorium Reactors ThorEA Workshop Trinity.
SRF COLLABORATION MEETING MAY.2016 ESS MEDIUM BETA CAVITY MANUFACTURING CEA Saclay/ESS ECCTD WU Cavités | Enrico Cenni.
DISCUSSION OF THE ARCS AND OVERALL LATTICE INTEGRATION FCC meeting 8th of January 2015 Antoine Chance.
1/10 VUJE, Inc., Okružná 5, Trnava, Slovakia; FEI STU, Ilkovičova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia Thorium Fuel Cycle Under VVER and PWR Conditions.
1 & 2 JUNE 2015 – LLRF – BEAM DYNAMICS WORKSHOP URIOT Didier What is taken into account in simulations LLRF – Beam dynamics Workshop.
ADSR08 Thorium Fuel Rods Bob Cywinski School of Applied Sciences University of Huddersfield ThorEA ADSR Workshop Cambridge 13 January 2009.
A SUBCELL BASED INTERFACE RECONSTRUCTION METHOD TO DEAL WITH FILAMENTS
IAEA International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power – The next Fifty Years Moscow - Obninsk, Russian Federation - June 28, 2004 Nuclear.
Task T HTS Dipole Magnet Design and Construction
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Safety Considerations for the Design of Thorium Fueled ADS Reactors ThorEA.
6th srf collaboration lasa 13 June CAVITY interfaces - Vincent Hennion / PIERRE BOSLAND Bonjour, Franck Peauger, Je suis Ingénieur RF.
XFEL Tuner system non-conformities Detected At saclay
MID: A MetaCASE Tool for a Better Reuse of Visual Notations
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Sensitivity analysis in burnup calculations with Monte Carlo
Improvements of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) at IAEA
Introduction to the third Technical Workshop on Fuel Cycle Simulation
Simulation Tool Benchmarking and Verification
COSI Evaluation of non-nuclear material balance with the COSI software
drhgfdjhngngfmhgmghmghjmghfmf 20 min total EDWARD Hoffman Bo Feng
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
Daniel Wojtaszek 3rd Technical Workshop on Fuel Cycle Simulation
Economic Analysis of Alternative Transition Pathways to Improve Economic Considerations in Fuel Cycle Transition Brent Dixon Deputy National Technical.
Anne Baschwitz Gilles Mathonnière
Critical design review #1 for medium beta cavity cryomodules 3-4 APRIL main evolutions between M-ECCTD and serie - Bonjour, Franck Peauger, Je.
Cryomodule Product Breakdown Structure and configuration traceability
Valuable Lessons from Fuel Cycle Code Comparisons
Introduction to the session Reactor Models
Cross Section Versus Recipes for Fuel Cycle Transition Analysis
Approaches to Evaluation of Spent Nuclear
Prospective inventory of radioactive materials
10th srf collaboration LASA JUNE CAVITY interfaces - Vincent Hennion
Presentation transcript:

On the use of plutonium burning fast reactors to reduce PWR irradiated assemblies’ stockpile 3rd Workshop on dynamic fuel cycle Timothée Kooyman, DEN,DR,SPRC,LE2C 11th July 2018 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

The CAPRA project European collaboration in the nineties with the aim of providing a fast reactor design for plutonium and minor actinides reprocessing. Modification of the European Fast Reactor design to enhance plutonium consumption. Updated in 2015 starting from the new CFV core developed at CEA. This is done by significantly modifying the core design. Two levels of modification of were considered here, with increasing Pu consumption. CFV breeder core (3.6 GW) : breeding gain > 0 CAPRA B1 core (3.6 GW) : breeding gain ≈ -0,2 CAPRA D core (3 GW) : breeding gain ≈ -0,5 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Performances of the CAPRA to reduce Pu inventory We want to answer two questions using the CEA/DEN scenario code COSI and analytical tools : Can CAPRA reactor significantly reduce the PWR irradiated assemblies stockpiles at the horizon 2080 ? Hypothesis : French fleet replaced by EPR around 2040 Deployement of two CAPRA reactors in 2064 and 2065 Period of interest : 2065-2090 Could CAPRA reactor be used to limit the plutonium inventory during the transition to a closed fuel cycle ? Hypothesis : - Semi-equilibrium situation with EPR-UOX + CAPRA fleet or EPR-UOX – EPR-MOX – CAPRA fleet 58 GWe of power installed Stabilization of the plutonium inventory 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Effect on the spent PWR assemblies Reference : 2 FR deployed -1000 t -1800 t 2 CAPRA cores can reduce by 34 % the stock piles of PWR MOX spent fuel by 2090. 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Reprocessing and manufacturing requirements This reduction requires an increase in manufacturing and reprocessing capabilities due to shorter residence times in the CAPRA cores 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Overall impact on plutonium inventory CAPRA consumes between 250 and 500 kg of Pu by year : a limited deployment can only slow down the rate of increase of Pu inventory. 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Overall impact on plutonium inventory What if we try to stabilize the plutonium inventory using CAPRA reactors ? 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Pu inventory in the fuel cycle (t) EPRTM-UOX – SFR CAPRA SYMBIOTIC FLEET Plutonium isotopic vector is characterized by its quality (ratio of 239Pu + 241Pu on total Pu), The balance equation of the fuel cycle is analytically solved. Between 1 and 2 CAPRA cores are required to consume the Pu production of an EPR.   CAPRA B CAPRA D Equilibrium quality 0,44 0,39 EPRTM (%) 0,56 0,71 SFR (%) 0,29 For a 58 GWe fleet EPRTM 21 27 SFR 18 13 Pu inventory by SFR (t) 33 44 Pu inventory in the fuel cycle (t) 594 572 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Pu inventory in the fuel cycle (t) EPRTM-UOX – EPRTM-MOX – SFR CAPRA SYMBIOTIC FLEET If the plutonium is first reprocessed through PWR with MOX fuel, the final quality of the plutonium is too low even for CAPRA cores.   CAPRA B CAPRA D Equilibrium quality 0,45 0,34 Fraction of EPRTM UOX 0,38 0,46 Fraction of EPRTM MOX 0,22 0,27 Fraction of SFR 0,40 0,26 For a 58 GWe fleet EPR UOX 14 18 EPR MOX 8 10 SFR 16 12 Pu inventory by SFR (t) 34 45 Pu inventory in the fuel cycle (t) 623 643 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Comparison with current French scenarios The goal of « Palier C » is to stabilize the plutonium inventory in the fuel cycle. The use of CAPRA reactors appears to lead to a significant reduction in the number of SFR required to achieve an equilibrium situation and a small reduction of Pu inventory. EPRTM UOX only EPRTM UOX+ EPRTM MOX CAPRA B1 CAPRA D Palier C (2014) EPR 100 % MOX Fraction of EPRTM UOX 0,56 0,71 0,38 0,46 0.5 Fraction of EPRTM 30 % MOX 0,22 0,27 0,6 (3 @ 100 % MOX) 0.25 (100 % MOX) Fraction of SFR 0,44 0,29 0,4 0,26 0.25 Pu inventory (t) 594 572 623 643 ≈ 600 > 645 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Fraction of SFR (Number of SFRs) Comparison with current French scenarios The goal of « Palier C » is to stabilize the plutonium inventory in the fuel cycle. The use of CAPRA reactors appears to lead to a significant reduction in the number of SFR required to achieve an equilibrium situation. EPRTM UOX only EPRTM UOX+ EPRTM MOX CAPRA B1 CAPRA D Palier C (2014) EPR 100 % MOX Fraction of EPRTM UOX 0,56 0,71 0,38 0,46 0.5 Fraction of EPRTM 30 % MOX 0,22 0,27 0,6 (3 @ 100 % MOX) 0.25 (100 % MOX) Fraction of SFR (Number of SFRs) 0,44 (18) 0,29 (14) 0,4 (16) 0,26 (13) 0.25 (12) 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Conclusions CAPRA cores are designed to maximize their plutonium consumption. They can lead to a significant decrease in the stockpile of spent PWR MOX fuel assemblies. However, their performances during a transition towards of a closed fuel cycle are comparable to that of standard fast reactors. Further detailled analysis is required to try to find the optimal solution (reprocessing capabilities, fluxes of waste, ect) Further questions if CAPRA deployement is considered ? Is it possible to transition from CAPRA to breeder if necessary ? How to generate enough plutonium to achieve closure of the fuel cycle with only SFRs ? What about the minor actinides production in the CAPRA cores ? What is the best option ? Can burner cores be used for other purposes (phase-out ?) 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Thanks for your attention Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives Centre de Cadarache | 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance Cedex T. +33 (0)4 42 25 23 96 Etablissement public à caractère industriel et commercial | R.C.S Paris B 775 685 019 DEN DER SPRC 11th July 2018 24 février 2019

Closing the fuel cycle after CAPRA deployment Plutonium mass in the fuel cycle (t) ≈1200 t Full SFR fleet : closed fuel cycle 1. Stabilisation of the inventory by deployment of CAPRA ≈ 600 Pu equilibrium with CAPRA 16 SFR CAPRA B 1450 MWe + 8 EPR MOX + 14 EPR UOX Time 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Closing the fuel cycle after CAPRA deployment Plutonium mass in the fuel cycle (t) ≈1200 t Full SFR fleet : closed fuel cycle 2. Tuning the SFRs design to achieve stabilization at a given level 1. Stabilisation of the inventory by deployment of CAPRA ≈ 600 Pu equilibrium with CAPRA 16 SFR CAPRA B 1450 MWe + 8 EPR MOX + 14 EPR UOX Time 24 février 2019 11th July 2018

Closing the fuel cycle after CAPRA deployment Plutonium mass in the fuel cycle (t) ≈1200 t Full SFR fleet : closed fuel cycle 2. Tuning the SFRs design to achieve stabilization at a given level 1. Stabilisation of the inventory by deployment of CAPRA 3. Turning the SFRs into breeders to generate plutonium to transition to a closed fuel cycle ≈ 600 Pu equilibrium with CAPRA 16 SFR CAPRA B 1450 MWe + 8 EPR MOX + 14 EPR UOX Time 24 février 2019 11th July 2018