Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Advertisements

EEG-MEG source reconstruction
Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
Statistical Inference
EEG/MEG Source Localisation
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips Cyclotron Research Centre University of Liège, Belgium SPM Short Course London, May 2011.
SPM Course Zurich, February 2012 Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
SPM 2002 Experimental Design Daniel Glaser Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL Slides from: Rik Henson, Christian Buchel, Karl Friston, Chris Frith,
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2011.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
SPM for EEG/MEG Guillaume Flandin
Event-related fMRI (er-fMRI)
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course Zurich, February 2014
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics April 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Topological Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2014 Many thanks to Justin.
The M/EEG inverse problem
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Bayesian inference.
Introduction to SPM SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012 Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
How much about our interactions with – and experience of – our world can be deduced from basic principles? This talk reviews recent attempts to understand.
The other stuff Vladimir Litvak Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Multiple comparisons in M/EEG analysis Gareth Barnes Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM M/EEG Course London, May 2013.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
Bayesian Inference and Posterior Probability Maps Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK SPM Course,
Dynamic causal modelling of electromagnetic responses Karl Friston - Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL In recent years,
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
Brain modes and network discovery Karl Friston The past decade has seen tremendous advances in characterising functional integration in the brain. Much.
Methods for Dummies Overview and Introduction
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Marta I. Garrido Thanks to: Karl J. Friston, Klaas E. Stephan, Andre C. Marreiros, Stefan J. Kiebel,
Dynamic Causal Modelling Introduction SPM Course (fMRI), October 2015 Peter Zeidman Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2009.
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors Will Penny Karl Friston Acknowledgments: Stefan Kiebel and John Ashburner The Wellcome Department of Imaging.
Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Zurich, February 2008 Bayesian Inference.
Bayesian Inference in SPM2 Will Penny K. Friston, J. Ashburner, J.-B. Poline, R. Henson, S. Kiebel, D. Glaser Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience,
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Stefan Kiebel, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan MultiModal Brain Imaging, Copenhagen,
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
Bayesian Model Selection and Averaging SPM for MEG/EEG course Peter Zeidman 17 th May 2016, 16:15-17:00.
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Endogenous Fluctuations
Topological Inference
Statistical Parametric Mapping for fMRI / MRI / VBM
SPM Software & Resources
SPM for M/EEG - introduction
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Topological Inference
The General Linear Model
Statistical Parametric Mapping
SPM2: Modelling and Inference
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Bayesian Methods in Brain Imaging
The General Linear Model
CRIS Workshop: Computational Neuroscience and Bayesian Modelling
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Bayesian Inference in SPM2
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK.
The General Linear Model
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
The General Linear Model
Will Penny Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging,
Bayesian Model Selection and Averaging
Presentation transcript:

SPM for M/EEG http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/course/london/material/ Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/course/london/material/ SPM Course London, May 2017

SPM Software “The SPM software was originally developed by Karl Friston for the routine statistical analysis of functional neuroimaging data from PET while at the Hammersmith Hospital in the UK, and made available to the emerging functional imaging community in 1991 to promote collaboration and a common analysis scheme across laboratories.” SPMclassic, SPM’94, SPM’96, SPM’99, SPM2, SPM5, SPM8 and SPM12 represent the ongoing theoretical advances and technical improvements of the original version.

Statistical Inference Image time-series Spatial filter Design matrix Statistical Parametric Map Realignment Smoothing General Linear Model Statistical Inference RFT Normalisation p <0.05 Anatomical reference Parameter estimates

Statistical Inference Random Field Theory 𝑦=𝑋 𝛽+𝜀 Contrast c Pre- processings General Linear Model Statistical Inference 𝛽 = 𝑋 𝑇 𝑋 −1 𝑋 𝑇 𝑦 𝜎 2 = 𝜀 𝑇 𝜀 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘(𝑋) 𝑆𝑃𝑀{𝑇,𝐹}

Statistical Parametric Mapping refers to the construction and assessment of spatially extended statistical processes used to test hypotheses about functional imaging data. Time Sensor to voxel transform Statistical Parametric Mapping for Event-Related Potentials I: Generic Considerations. S.J. Kiebel and K.J. Friston. NeuroImage, 2004. Topological inference for EEG and MEG, J. Kilner and K.J. Friston, Annals of Applied Statistics, 2010.

M/EEG Source Analysis Forward Problem Inverse Problem Data Likelihood Prior Posterior Evidence Parameters Inverse Problem

Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG  DCM for event-related potentials  DCM for cross-spectral density Physiological (neurophysiological model: electromagnetic forward model included. States different from data y) Phenomenological: models a particular data feature: Source locations not optimized. States x and data y in the same “format”. The main principle of DCM is the use of data and generative models in a Bayesian framework to infer parameters and compare models. Implementation details may vary – e.g. variational Bayes vs. sampling methods Model inversion is an optimization procedure where the objective function is the free energy which approximates the model evidence. Model evidence is the goodness of fit expected under the prior parameter values. The best model is the one with precise priors that yield good fit to the data. Different models can be compared as long as they were fitted to the same data. Models and priors can be gradually refined from one study to the next, making it possible to use DCM as an integrative framework in neuroscience.  DCM for induced responses  DCM for phase coupling 7

Software: SPM12 Free and Open Source Software (GPL) Requirements: MATLAB: 7.4 (R2007a) to 9.2 (R2017a) no MathWorks toolboxes required Supported platforms: Linux, Windows and Mac File formats: Volumetric images: NIfTI (DICOM import) Geometric images: GIfTI M/EEG: most manufacturers (FieldTrip’s fileio) Standalone version available.

SPM Website http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ SPM software Documentation & Bibliography Example data sets

Litvak et al, EEG and MEG Data Analysis in SPM8. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, id:852961, 2011.

SPM Toolboxes User-contributed SPM extensions: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ext/

SPM Mailing List http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/support/ spm@jiscmail.ac.uk

The SPM co-authors Jesper Andersson John Ashburner Nelson Trujillo-Barreto Gareth Barnes Matthew Brett Christian Buchel CC Chen Justin Chumbley Jean Daunizeau Olivier David Guillaume Flandin Karl Friston Darren Gitelman Daniel Glaser Volkmar Glauche Lee Harrison Rik Henson Andrew Holmes Chloe Hutton Maria Joao Stefan Kiebel James Kilner Vladimir Litvak Andre Marreiros Jérémie Mattout Rosalyn Moran Tom Nichols Robert Oostenveld Will Penny Christophe Phillips Dimitris Pinotsis Jean-Baptiste Poline Ged Ridgway Holly Rossiter Mohamed Seghier Klaas Enno Stephan Sungho Tak Bernadette Van Wijk Peter Zeidman