Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
Advertisements

EPA Preliminary Designations for the 24-hour PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee (AQTAC) September 18,
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.
1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards Review Process and Status Tom Moore WESTAR Council Meeting September 29, 2010 Portland, OR.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
11111 Beth M. Hassett-Sipple, US EPA/OAQPS EPA/WESTAR Residential Wood Smoke Workshop March 1, 2011 Salt Lake City, UT National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter Overview
Meeting of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission 4/16/2015.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
NAAQS UPDATE SIP Steering Committee January 13, 2011.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Criteria Pollutants Criteria pollutants selected because they are ubiquitous, have multiple sources, and "may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
EPA Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone MWAQC January 27, 2010.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
PM 2.5 Implementation--USMC Operational Impacts Assessment 7 April 2004 Mr. Elmer Ransom Headquarters, USMC Mr. Jeff Davis URS Corporation.
Revisions to NAAQS –Data Handling and Interpretation NO 2 /SO 2 Update AQS Conference Colorado Springs June 2010 Rhonda Thompson US EPA, Office of Air.
Workshop on the Origin and Development of the Keeler Dunes Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Governing Board Meeting March 7, 2013 Part.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2013 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality (800)
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Status of the Particulate Matter (PM) Air Quality Standards November 28, 2012.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
EPA’s Proposed PM NAAQS and Monitoring Regulations  NTAA Perspective for Reg. 8 RTOC  Bill Grantham  Denver, February 23, 2006.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management 2009 Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report Office of Air Quality.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary Report.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
EPA Planning and implementation Update Western Regional Air Partnership November 11, 2009.
1 Agricultural Programs for Controlling Particulate Matter Pollution Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Air Quality Division presented to Western State Air Resources.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particle Pollution Mike Papp U.S. EPA
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation Interactive Session NACAA Annual Meeting May 8, 2013 St. Louis, MO 1.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Air Quality (800) Fine Particles (PM 2.5 ) Summary.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
September 2006 Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution Overview
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
PM NAAQS - Panel and Roundtable
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
PM 2.5 Designation Process and Timeline
Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9 December 14, 2005
Air Quality Committee Meeting July 11, 2012 Donnie Redmond
Presentation transcript:

Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006

Overview On December 20, 2005 the EPA proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particle pollution. The proposed revisions would strengthen a fine particle standard important for both health and visibility, and would improve and refocus the coarse particle standards on those particles that are associated with public health concerns. The proposed revisions address two categories of particle pollution: fine particles (PM2.5), which are 2.5 micrometers in diameter and smaller; and inhalable coarse particles (PM10-2.5), which are smaller than 10 micrometers in diameter but larger than PM2.5. For more information go to www.epa.gov/air/particlepollution

PM2.5 – Primary 24-hour Standard Under the proposal, EPA would revise the level of the 24-hour standard from the current level of 65 µg/m3 to 35 µg/m3. EPA is proposing this change based on its assessment of a significantly expanded body of scientific information. Studies show health effects at and below the level of the current standard EPA also is considering alternative levels for the 24-hour standard, between the range of 35 and 30 µg/m3 and is soliciting public comment on these levels. In addition, the Agency will take comment on alternative approaches for selecting the level of the standard, and on levels as high as the current level of 65 µg/m3 and as low as 25 µg/m3.

PM2.5 – Primary Annual Standard EPA is proposing to retain the current annual standard at 15µg/m3 EPA is proposing to retain this standard based on its assessment of several expanded, re-analyzed and new studies that have increased the Agency’s confidence in associations between long-term PM2.5 exposure and serious health effects, including heart and lung-related death. EPA is considering and is seeking public comment on lower alternatives for the annual standard including 14 and 13 µg/m3. In addition, the Agency will take comment on alternative views including a standard as low as 12 µg/m3.

PM2.5 – Secondary Standards The proposal would set the secondary standards for both the annual and 24-hour standards at levels identical to the primary standards EPA also is taking comment on whether to set a separate PM2.5 standard, designed to address visibility (principally in urban areas) At levels within a range of 20 to 30 µg/m3, and On averaging times within a range of four to eight daylight hours

Currently Designated

Counties Exceeding 15 mg/m3 Annual and/or 35 mg/m3 24-hour PM2 Counties Exceeding 15 mg/m3 Annual and/or 35 mg/m3 24-hour PM2.5 Standard Based on 2002-2004 Data* Annual and 24-hour PM2.5 Nonattainment (53 counties) 24-hour Only PM2.5 Nonattainment (69) Annual PM2.5 Only Nonattainment (15) (2002-2004; includes all sites w/ 11+ observations per quarter or those deemed complete via ‘data substitution’) (137 counties) *These projections are based on the most recent data (2002-2004). EPA will not designate areas as nonattainment on these data, but likely on 2006-2008 data which we expect to show improved air quality.

Inhalable Coarse PM – Moving from PM10 to PM10-2.5 EPA’s current standards for coarse particles (PM10) were set in 1987. These standards – a 24-hour standard of 150 µg/m3, and an annual standard of 50 µg/m3 -- apply to particles 10 micrometers in diameter and smaller. The proposed revisions would change the definition of standard so that it covers only particles between 10 and 2.5 micrometers in diameter also known as PM10-2.5, and “inhalable coarse particles.”

Inhalable Coarse PM – Moving from PM10 to PM10-2.5 EPA would further define PM10-2.5 to include only those coarse particles that come from sources such as: high-density traffic on paved roads, industrial sources, and construction activities. These are the kinds of coarse particles typically found in urban areas. Scientific studies indicate that PM10-2.5 health effects are associated with these kinds of coarse particles found in urban areas.

Inhalable Coarse PM – Moving from PM10 to PM10-2.5 The proposed standard would not cover situations where the coarse particles in the air come from sources like: windblown dust and soils, agricultural sources, and mining sources These are the kinds of coarse particles typically found in rural areas. Evidence to date does not support a national air quality standard for these kinds of situations.

PM10-2.5 Standards The proposed new PM10-2.5 standard would be a 24-hour standard, at 70 µg/m3. EPA is not proposing an annual standard for PM10-2.5. There is not sufficient scientific evidence to support a long-term standard for coarse particles Under the proposal, the secondary 24-hour standard for PM10-2.5 would be identical to the primary standard.

Revoking the Current PM10 Standard EPA is proposing to revoke the current 24-hour PM10 standards, except in areas that have both 1) violating monitors; and 2) a population of 100,000 or more. These standards would remain in place in these areas until the Agency has completed attainment and nonattainment designations for PM 10-2.5. EPA is taking comment on whether the 24-hour PM10 standards should be retained in smaller areas (population less than 100,000) that are dominated by one or more large industrial sources. The Agency is proposing to immediately revoke the current annual PM10 standards in all areas. Current scientific evidence does not show significant public health risks associated long-term exposure to coarse particles.

Current PM NAAQS Review – Schedule Rulemaking on PM NAAQS: Proposal signed on December 20, 2005 (consent agreement) Public comment period: 90 days Public Hearings to be held late February in Philadelphia, Chicago and San Francisco Final Rule to be signed by September 27, 2006 (consent agreement) Proposal includes simultaneous rulemakings PM NAAQS, Federal Reference Method, & Data Handling (Part 50) Air Monitoring Regulations: Requirements for Reference and Equivalent Methods, Network Design Requirements (Parts 53 & 58) Upcoming and related rulemakings: Exceptional & Natural Events, Implementation Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Timeline if PM2.5 NAAQS are Revised Milestone 1997 PM2.5 Primary NAAQS 2006 PM2.5 Primary NAAQS Promulgation of Standard July 1997 Nov. 2006 State Recommendations to EPA Feb. 2004 (based on 2001-2003 monitoring data) Nov. 2007 (based on 2004-2006 monitoring data) Final Designations Signature Dec. 2004 Nov. 2009 Effective Date of Designations April 2005 April 2010 SIPs Due April 2008 April 2013 Attainment Date April 2010 (based on 2007-2009 monitoring data) April 2015 (based on 2012-2104 monitoring data) Attainment Date with Extension Up to April 2015 April 2020

Timeline if PM10-2.5 Standard is Finalized Milestone 2006 PM10-2.5 NAAQS Effective date of Standard Nov. 2006 State Recommendations to EPA July 2012 (based on 2009-2011 monitoring data) Final Designations May 2013 Effective Date of Designations July 2013 SIPs Due July 2016 Attainment Date July 2018 (based on 2015-2017 monitoring data) Attainment Date with Extension Up to July 2023