Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Cycle of Medical Devices: A Path of Opportunities for Information Professionals Donna Gay Pharma & Health Tech Div, SLA 2007 Spring Meeting.
Advertisements

Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
Sorenson Medical, West Jordan, Utah USA Medical Device Development Robert Hitchcock, Ph.D. Director of Engineering & Technology Development Sorenson Medical,
Entering the US Market: Medical Devices
IRB Process & Medical Devices
23andMe and FDA A Legal Perspective. Outline 1.FDA Background - Zach 2.About 23andme - Laura 3.FDA letter and arguments - Zach 4.23andme potential defenses.
Overview of FDA Device Regulations
Office of Science and Technology Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA William A. Herman eHealth Technologies and the FDA.
Regulation of Medical Devices Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation.
Barbara Gibson, MS, RN, CCRC, CIP, CHRC Regulatory Affairs Officer Vanderbilt Human Research Protection Program.
"Determining the Regulatory Pathway to Market" Classification Heather S. Rosecrans Director, 510(k) Staff Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) 101 Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE Biomedical Engineer IDE and HDE Program Staff Center for Devices and Radiological.
510k Submission Overview Myraqa, Inc. August 22, 2012.
Medical Device Submissions
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey John L. Ricci, Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedics History and Scope of Biomaterials J. L. Ricci, Ph.D.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Emerging Forms of Evidence in Assessing Regenerative Medicine Linda F. Hogle,Ph.D. Dept. Medical History and Bioethics University of Wisconsin School.
Medical Devices Approval Process
Donna M. Liewer FCLB Executive Director Understanding the FDA: Key Considerations for Regulatory Agencies.
The FDA Landscape AdvaMed September 2008 Judith K. Meritz
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Weaving regulations into sound value analysis processes Barbara Strain, MA, SM(ASCP) Director Value Management University of Virginia Health System.
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
Product Definition Chapter 4. What is a Medical Device? FDA: “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent,
Office of Combination Products: Current Initiatives
Dietary Supplements Bradford W. Williams Special Assistant Division of Dietary Supplement Programs ONPLDS, CFSAN, FDA.
Presented by: George Howe Executive Vice President Business Development & OEM Accounts.
Device Research Presented by Marian Serge, R.N.. Goals Identify devices Recognize difference between significant risk (SR) and non- significant risk (NSR)
Prof. Moustafa M. Mohamed Vice dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University in Alexandria Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO ▪ HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) 4/2009.
The Medical Device Pathway as a Legal Onramp for Futuristic Persons THE FUTURE T HE M EDICAL D EVICE P ATHWAY AS A L EGAL.
1 Importation of Medical Devices FDA Chicago District O’Hare Import Resident Post August 26, 2010 Import Entry Review Team Tamara M. Qtami, CSO.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
Compliance with FDA Regulations: Collecting, Transmitting and Managing Clinical Information Dan C Pettus Senior Vice President iMetrikus, Inc.
UNCLASSIFIED10/12/ :41 AM Slide 1 Division of Regulated Activities and Compliance.
510(k) Process: Best Practices in Changing Times… MassMEDIC Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham, MA April 1, :00 AM - 10:30 AM.
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
“513(g)s” Requests for Information Lawrence “Jake” Romanell, RM (AAM) Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Regulatory and Legal Challenges for Developers of Drug Delivery Devices Public Workshop: Innovative Systems for Delivery of Drugs.
Utah Life Science Summit Nov Phil Triolo, PhD RAC President, Phil Triolo and Associates LC.
Regulatory Decision Making D. Kathleen Wright, Reviewer Division of Microbiology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation & Safety ( OIVD ) Food.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
June 23, 2005Abiomed, H DRAFT. CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES PANEL Thursday, June 23, 2005 Abiomed, Inc. Abiocor® Implantable Replacement Heart HDE.
REGULATION OF MEDICAL DEVICES INNOVATION TUĞÇE YAŞAR
BIORESEARCH MONITORING & IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES Presented by Jean Toth-Allen, Ph.D. Biophysicist/Consumer Safety Officer Division of Bioresearch Monitoring.
GU Advisory Panel Meeting Nocturnal Home Hemodialysis Draft Carolyn Y. Neuland, Ph.D. Chief, Gastroenterology and Renal Devices Branch Division of Reproductive,
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Moj Eram, PhD Senior Consultant ARC Experts, LLC 6 April, 2016
Regulation of Medical Devices: Tanzania experience Fimbo, A. M Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority.
Device Updates in FDASIA MDUFA III RA SAIC – 9 th April 2013 Karen Jaffe, MS, MBA, RAC or
PD233: Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems (Lecture 2) Dr. Manish Arora CPDM, IISc Course Website:
Cardiovascular Device Development in the United States: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Executive Director, Registrar Corp
GCP AND MEDICAL DEVICES
Guidance for review of studies involving HCT/Ps and IND Basics
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs)
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Overview of regulatory and compliance in software development for medical devices
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Get Ready for FDA Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests Presenter:
A “Successful” FDA Submission: Key Components Needed
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
MEDICAL DEVICES CONTROL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Cardiovascular Device Development and Approval: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of.
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies Quynh Hoang Neurotherapeutic and Neurodiagnostic Devices Branch Division of Ophthalmic, Neurological and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health ASENT February 24, 2011

Disclaimer This presentation reflects the views of the author and should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.

Overview Regulatory definitions: drug, device, biological product, combination product Medical Device Platform Technology Examples OCP and Lead Center Medical Device Classifications and Corresponding Applications Medical Device Submissions for Platform Technology Examples Recent Development in CDRH

OCP

Drug Definition (A) articles recognized in the US Pharmacopoeia, Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia, or National Formulary; or (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; or (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals. 21 USC 201(g)

Device Definition Instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, which is - (1) recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, or (2) intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or (3) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes. 21 USC 201(h)

Biological Product Definition Virus Therapeutic Serum Toxin or Antitoxin Vaccine Blood, Blood Component or Derivative Allergenic Product Protein (except any chemically synthesized polypeptide) Analogous Product (e.g., human tissues) Arsphenamine or its derivatives applicable to the prevention, treatment, or cure of diseases or injuries of man 42 USC 262 (as amended 2010)

Combination Product Definition Combination of Biological Product & Device Biological Product & Drug Device & Drug Biological Product & Device & Drug NOT of drug&drug, device&device or biologic&biologic Combination from being: Physically or chemically combined Co-packaged in a kit Separate, cross-labeled products 21 CFR 3.2(e)

Medical Device Platform Technology Examples New indication for a marketed device New component for a marketed device to support new indication Combining a marketed device with a marketed drug and/or biological product

Medical Device Platform Technology Examples New indication for a marketed device New component for a marketed device to support new indication Combining a marketed device with a marketed drug and/or biological product Device Device Combination Product !

Office of Combination Product (OCP) OCP determines lead Center

OCP’s algorithm Primary mode of action 2. If unable to determine most important therapeutic action with reasonable certainty, consider: Consistency: is there an agency component that regulates other combination products presenting similar questions of S & E with regard to combination product as a whole? Safety and Effectiveness: which agency component has the most expertise related to most significant S&E questions presented by combination product?

Medical Device Platform Technology Examples New indication for a marketed device New component for a marketed device to support new indication Combining a marketed device with a marketed drug and/or biological product Device Device CDRH-Lead

Device Regulation is Risk-based Medical Device Classes: Class I General Controls Most exempt from premarket submission Class II Special Controls Premarket Notification [510(k)] Class III Premarket Approval Premarket Approval Application [PMA] Additional Classification: De Novo Device "types" that have never been marketed in the U.S., but whose safety profile and technology are now reasonably well understood Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Devices for orphan diseases intended to benefit patients in diagnosis and/or treatment of disease or condition affecting or manifested in fewer than 4,000 patients per year in the US.

Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) application An FDA approved IDE allows a significant risk investigational device to be used in a clinical study in the U.S. in order to collect safety and effectiveness data 21 CFR 812

Medical Device Platform Technology Examples New indication for a marketed device New component for a marketed device to support new indication Combining a marketed device with a marketed drug and/or biological product What was the marketing pathway for the platform technology?

Platform Technology was 510(k) “cleared” or De Novo “classified” Change to Indication: Does the change to the indication alter the intended therapeutic/diagnostic/etc. effect (or impact safety or effectiveness)? Change to Technology: Does the change raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions? No to both  510(k) Yes to either  De Novo, PMA, or HUD/HDE AND supporting clinical (IDE) data for a significant risk device

Platform Technology was PMA “approved” Original PMA Panel-Track PMA Supplement, or PMA Supplement (with IDE data to support new indication or claim)

Platform Technology was HDE “approved” Request a Humanitarian Use Device (HUD) Designation from the Office of Orphan Products Development for the new device. If HUD is granted, HDE (with clinical to support new indication). If HUD is not granted, 510(k) or PMA.

Marketing Applications 510(k) – substantial equivalence to a predicate De Novo After a not-substantially-equivalent 510(k) determination Low risk, Available data and Special controls PMA – reasonable assurance of safety and reasonable assurance of effectiveness HDE – reasonable assurance of safety and probable benefit

Some Recent Developments in CDRH CDRH Preliminary Internal Evaluations of the 510(k) review process CDRH Innovation Pathway Streamline the De Novo process www.fda.gov (search highlighted terms)

FDA Contacts OCP: combination@fda.gov or 301-796-8930 Orphans Product: 301-796-8660 Medical Device Pre-market Process-Programs Operations Staff: Robert.Gatling@fda.hhs.gov or 301-796-6560 Neuro Device Pre-market Questions: Quynh.Hoang@fda.hhs.gov or 301-796-6610 CDRH Information Resources: search term “CDRH Learn” or “Device Advice” from Google or on www.fda.gov

Thank You!