Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.
Advertisements

Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Remote sensing in meteorology
Microwindow Selection for the MIPAS Reduced Resolution Mode INTRODUCTION Microwindows are the small subsets of the complete MIPAS spectrum which are used.
Integrating Changes to JPSS Cross-Track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) SDR Algorithm using the Algorithm Development Library (ADL) Vipuli Dharmawardane 1, Bigyani.
Cloud Top Height Retrieval From MIPAS Jane Hurley, Anu Dudhia, Graham Ewen, Don Grainger Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford.
CrIS Full Spectral Resolution Test Results 1 Mark Esplin 1, L. Larrabee Strow 2, Gail Bingham 1, Deron Scott 1, and Chad Fish 1 1 Space Dynamics Laboratory.
CALCON 2003 GIFTS On-orbit Spectral Calibration On-orbit Spectral Calibration of the Geosynchronous Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) USU/SDL.
Inter-Comparison of Suomi NPP CrIS with AIRS and IASI toward Infrared Hyperspectral Benchmark Radiance Measurements Likun Wang1*, Yong Han2, Yong Chen1,
AIRS: Grating spectrometer; IASI and CrIS: Interferometer Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2, Fuzhong Weng 2, Mitch Goldberg 3 1. UMD/ESSIC/CICS, College Park, MD.
Infrared Interferometers and Microwave Radiometers Dr. David D. Turner Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin - Madison
Measurement of Thermal Infrared Radiation Emitted by the Atmosphere Using FTIR Spectroscopy By Narayan Adhikari Charles Woodman 5/11/2010 PHY 360.
University of Wisconsin - Madison Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC) High Spectral Resolution IR Observing & Instruments Hank Revercomb (Part.
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
AIRS (Atmospheric Infrared Sounder) Regression Retrieval (Level 2)
A Method for Correcting for Telescope Spectral Transmission in the Geosynchronous Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) John D. Elwell, Deron.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
Studies of Advanced Baseline Sounder (ABS) for Future GOES Jun Li + Timothy J. Allen Huang+ W. +CIMSS, UW-Madison.
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
Suomi NPP CrIS SDR Provisional Product Highlight Yong Han, CrIS SDR Team Lead Suomi NPP SDR Product Review NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison South Africa, April 2006.
Mathew M. Gunshor* 1, Scott Lindstrom 2, Timothy J. Schmit 3, David C. Tobin 1, W. Paul Menzel 1 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
UW-SSEC On-orbit Calibration of the Geostationary Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) H. E. Revercomb a, F. A. Best a, D. C. Tobin a, R. O.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
Denis Tremblay 1, Yong Han 2, Yong Chen 3, Likun Wang 3, Xin Jin 2, Xiaozhen Xiong 2, Lihang Zhou 2 1 Science Data Processing Inc., 2 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS Likun Wang 1, Yong Han 2*, Denis Tremblay 3, Fuzhong Weng 2, and Mitch Goldberg 4 1. CICS/ESSIC/University of.
CLARREO Pathfinder - Overview
Updates on CMA Meteorological Satellite Programs
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
China’s FengYun Meteorological Satellite Programs
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Wang Ling, Hu Xiuqing, Chen Lin
Basic Concepts of Remote Sensing
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
FY2-IASI and FY3C-IASI towards Demo
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
15 November 2018 Best Practice for Hyperspectral IR Sounder SDR Ground Processing - Lessons learned from CrIS Likun Wang & Hank Revercomb University.
Michael J. Jun Li#, Daniel K. Zhou%, and Timothy J.
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
Meteosat Second Generation
Comparison between Sentinel-3A SLSTR and IASI aboard Metop-A and –B
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
On-orbit Performance : DAY-1 Results
Instrument Considerations
Hui Xu, Yong Chen, and Likun Wang
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
MTF Evaluation of Himawari-8/AHI using Lunar Observations
Hanlie XU, Xiuqing HU, Chunqiang Wu, Tianhang Yang, Na Xu
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
2018 GSICS Data & Research Working Groups Annual Meeting
Calibration and Validation of Microwave Humidity Sounder onboard FY-3D Satellite Yang Guo, Songyan Gu NSMC/CMA Mar
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
By Narayan Adhikari Charles Woodman
Dorothee Coppens.
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val
Remote sensing in meteorology
FY-3D/HIRAS On-orbit performance and validation
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Hanlie XU, Na XU, Xiuqing HU CMA
Masaya Takahashi1, Yusuke Yogo1, Qiang Guo2, Xiuqing Hu2, and Na Xu2
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Presentation transcript:

Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing Xuan Feng, Qiang Guo National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration (NSMC/CMA)

Contents GIIRS background Accuracy assessment Summary

GIIRS Background Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder(GIIRS) is located on the new generation geostationary platform FY-4A. GIIRS is a Michelson interferometer based on the principle of Fourier Transform and designed to measure the emission of infrared radiation from the atmosphere in the two infrared spectral bands. GIIRS FY-4A

GIIRS Background The GIIRS scanning is performed in step-and-stare mode, and the instrument stares for a dwell-time of at least 1.3 seconds over the same Earth location and gets an inter ferogram. A number of interferograms are acquired by two sets of array-detectors (32×4 samples, IFOV@Nadir: 16km) within both LWIR and MWIR bands, respectively during the dwell time. 32×4 Array of GIIRS FOVs ( 16km in length each )

GIIRS specifications Band Spectral Range (cm-1) Resolution (1/2L) MPD Sensitivity (mW/m2 sr cm-1) Spatial resolution (Km) LW 700 – 1130 0.625 0.8 0.5-1.1 16 MW 1650-2250 0.1-0.14 There are two infrared spectral bands defined for the GIIRS sensor: the Long Wave (LW), the Mid Wave (MW). The spectral limits corresponding to these bands and the required on-axis unapodized spectral resolution in each band is 0.625 cm–1.

GIIRS Operational Concept Space segment: At each dwell, GIIRS observes 8 Earth scenes with interferometer sweeps in forward and reverse direction Every 15 mins, GIIRS observes 16 calibration targets (8 Deep Space + 8 hot body Target) Ground segment: Transform GIIRS interferograms into fully calibrated and geolocated spectra Transform spectra into temperature, pressure and moisture profiles

Contents GIIRS background Calibration and validation Summary

Calibration and validation The radiometric calibration The cold space spectrum and the hot body spectrum are used to compute the instantaneous radiometric calibration coefficients The Spectral calibration Initially was based upon pre-launch measurements Through post-launch testing , the spectral calibration coefficients have been updated using clear sky earth spectrum Noise Equivalent Differential Radiance(NEdN) estimated as the standard deviation of the measured spectral radiance over a set of acquired blackbody samples Radiometric accuracy assessment Through comparison with IASI

Noise Performance NEdN in the longwave spectral range NEdN in the midwave spectral range GIIRS Radiance measurement requirements are 0.5-1.1 mw/m2 sr cm-1 in LMIR and 0.1-0.14 mw/m2 sr cm-1 in MWIR The noise performance is good in most of the spectral range In some spectral range, NEdN is larger Up to now, the reason is still unknown

Radiometric accuracy assessment SNO Criteria Time difference: less than 15min Zenith angle difference: ABS(cos(a1)/cos(a2)-1) <= 0.01 Pixel distance: the FOV of GIIRS almost covers the FOV of IASI completely Assessment of GIIRS radiometric accuracy is through comparison with IASI. Agreement is good for most of the spectral range Larger BT difference in some spectral range

SNOs between GIIRS and IASI 760 1050 1800 2188 MWIR LWIR Because the noise performance is poor in some spectral range, the results are compared from 760 to 1050 cm-1 and from 1800 to 2188 cm-1. Comparison with IASI ,the bias is less than 1 Kelvin, but Larger standard deviation in the midwave spectral range LWIR MWIR Period: 20170801~20171031; Ref: METOP-A/IASI; Samples: 110(LW)/108(MW)

On-orbit spectral calibration Here shows integrated residuals (observed and calculated) for the 700 to 718 cm-1 region with the effective laser wavenumber perturbed by various The GIIRS spectral calibration requirement is less than 10ppm 700-718 cm-1 and 2050-2100 cm-1, respectively. Spectral calibration will be performed using Earth scene atmospheric reference lines. The optimal effective laser wave-number minimum (resulting GIIRS wavenumber scale) is found when the RMS residual (observed minus calculated radiance) is minimum There is a well defined minimum in this curve, establishing the spectral calibration to better than 10ppm

spectral calibration coefficients LWIR MWIR Forward sweep Forward sweep Here, showing the spectral calibration coefficient of every field of view(FOV) in the forward and reverse direction over each band. The black line means getting from pre-launch measurements The red line means the new one using Earth scene atmospheric reference lines. Reverse sweep Reverse sweep

光谱定标修正前 The top panel have been shown before, the spectral calibration coefficient was based upon pre-launch measurements The down panel use the new spectral calibration coefficient As we can see, the bias and standard deviation in the mid-wave spectral range has declined. 光谱定标修正后

MW: No.47 Let us see the details of the spectrum, the left use the old spectral calibration coefficient, right use the new spectral calibration coefficient line structures show very good agreement between GIIRS and IASI when using the new coefficient. FOV47 is the field of view near the axis

MW: No.66 FOV66 is the field of view off the axis. the left use the old spectral calibration coefficient, right use the new spectral calibration coefficient when using the new coefficient, line structures show better agreement than before.

Contents GIIRS background Accuracy assessment Summary

Summary Spectral calibration working very well Radiometric calibration accuracy : Comparisons to IASI within 1K for most of the spectral range Larger standard deviation in MWIR On-going/Future Work Because of the extremely small range of angles contributing to each individual detector pixel , the variation of ILS (Instrument Line Shape) across the array is extremely small and be ignored non-linearity correction 2019/2/23

Thank you! 2019/2/23