Sina Ercan, MD, Thomas W. Rice, MD, Sudish C. Murthy, MD, PhD, Lisa A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas W. Rice, MD, Deepak Khuntia, MD, Lisa A. Rybicki, MS, David J
Advertisements

Spinal cord protective strategies during descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the modern era: The role of intrathecal papaverine 
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Characterization and Importance of Air Leak After Lobectomy
Stapled excision of the left atrial appendage
Robert J. Dabal, MD, James K
Prognosis of patients removed from a transplant waiting list for medical improvement: Implications for organ allocation and transplantation for status.
Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience  David P. Mason, MD, Lucy Thuita, MS, Edward.
Siva Raja, MD, PhD, Thomas W. Rice, MD, John Ehrlinger, PhD, John R
Srdjan V. Kostic, MDa, Thomas W. Rice, MDa, Mark E
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Lillian H. Batizy, MS, Eugene H
Effect of changes in postoperative spirometry on survival after lung transplantation  David P. Mason, MD, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, MSc, Liang Li, PhD,
Endovascular versus open elephant trunk completion for extensive aortic disease  Eric E. Roselli, MD, Sreekumar Subramanian, MD, Zhiyuan Sun, BS, Jahanzaib.
The least of 3 evils: Exposure to red blood cell transfusion, anemia, or both?  Gabriel Loor, MD, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Liang Li, PhD, Joseph F.
Mitral Valve Surgery in the Adult Marfan Syndrome Patient
Surgical treatment of pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta
Surgical Treatment of Postinfarction Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm
Esophageal submucosa: The watershed for esophageal cancer
Duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device implantation: Risk factors and impact on outcome  Soren Schenk, MD, Patrick M. McCarthy,
Reoperation After Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Disease
Coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetics: A growing health care cost crisis  Sajjad Raza, MD, Joseph F. Sabik, MD, Ponnuthurai Ainkaran, MS, Eugene.
Kwhanmien Kim, MD, Thomas W. Rice, MD, Sudish C
Surgical Repair of Posterior Mitral Valve Prolapse: Implications for Guidelines and Percutaneous Repair  Douglas R. Johnston, MD, A. Marc Gillinov, MD,
Effects of right ventricular morphology and function on outcomes of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease  Ying Ye, BS, Ravi Desai, MD, Lina.
Albert S. Y. Chang, MD, Nicholas G. Smedira, MD, Catherine L
Too High for Transplantation
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
Outcomes of heart transplantation in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome previously palliated with the Norwood procedure  Bahaaldin Alsoufi,
Should lung transplantation be performed using donation after cardiac death? The United States experience  David P. Mason, MD, Lucy Thuita, MS, Joan M.
Spinal cord protective strategies during descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the modern era: The role of intrathecal papaverine 
Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?
A. Marc Gillinov, MD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD, Edward R
Atrial fibrillation complicating lung cancer resection
Stage III non–small cell lung cancer and metachronous brain metastases
Reduced survival in women after valve surgery for aortic regurgitationEffect of aortic enlargement and late aortic rupture  Monica L. McDonald, MDa, Nicholas.
Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery
Nicholas G. Smedira, MD, Katherine J. Hoercher, RN, Dustin Y
David P. Mason, MD, Lillian H. Batizy, MS, Jeffrey Wu, MD, Edward R
Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
Eugene H. Blackstone, MDa,b, Bruce W. Lytle, MDb 
Surgical management of aortopulmonary window associated with interrupted aortic arch: A Congenital Heart Surgeons Society study  Igor E. Konstantinov,
Outcomes of multistage palliation of infants with functional single ventricle and heterotaxy syndrome  Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD, Courtney McCracken, PhD,
Reintervention After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: Is It Inevitable?
Distal aortic interventions after repair of ascending dissection: The argument for a more aggressive approach  Eric E. Roselli, MD, Gabriel Loor, MD,
Value of accelerated multimodality therapy in stage IIIA and IIIB non–small cell lung cancer  Malcolm M DeCamp, MD, Thomas W Rice, MD, David J Adelstein,
Comparative study of bronchial artery revascularization in lung transplantation  Gösta B. Pettersson, MD, PhD, Karam Karam, MD, Lucy Thuita, MS, Douglas.
Sudish C. Murthy, MD, PhD, Edward R. Nowicki, MD, MS, David P
Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration.
David P. Mason, MD, Dale H. Marsh, MD, Joan M. Alster, MS, Sudish C
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Decision support in surgical management of ischemic cardiomyopathy
Impact of Anastomotic Airway Complications After Lung Transplantation
M1a/M1b esophageal carcinoma: Clinical relevance
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Fernando A. Atik, MD, Delos M
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Thomas W. Rice, MD, Deepak Khuntia, MD, Lisa A. Rybicki, MS, David J
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
Ventilatory dependency after cardiovascular surgery
Saving the esophagus: At what cost?
Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement  A.Marc Gillinov, MD, Eugene H Blackstone, MD, Delos M Cosgrove,
Siva Raja, MD, PhD, Jay J. Idrees, MD, Eugene H
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse early and late outcomes after aortic valve replacement: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement 
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise
Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Fernando A. Atik, MD, Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, FACC, Eugene H
Proceed with caution: The importance of surveillance in patients with pathologic complete response after chemoradiation therapy plus surgery for esophageal.
Presentation transcript:

Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?  Sina Ercan, MD, Thomas W. Rice, MD, Sudish C. Murthy, MD, PhD, Lisa A. Rybicki, MS, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 623-631 (March 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024 Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Modified Collard cervical esophagogastric anastomotic technique (see Electronic Video). A, With apposition of the posterior walls of the esophagus and stomach, an endoscopic linear cutting stapler is applied to construct the posterior wall of the anastomosis. The anvil is placed in the esophagus, and the staple cartridge is placed in the stomach. B, The anterior wall is constructed with a running suture. Transverse closure allows maximal distraction of the stapled ends of the posterior wall. The arrow shows the anastomotic lumen. Reprinted with the permission of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Freedom from cervical wound infection. Each symbol represents an event among patients receiving the modified Collard cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (stapled, open circles) or hand-sewn anastomosis (sewn, open squares). Vertical bars are asymmetric nonparametric confidence limits equivalent to 1 SE. Numbers in parentheses are patients remaining at risk. Solid lines are parametric estimates and are enclosed within asymmetric confidence limits equivalent to 1 SE. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Instantaneous risk (hazard function) of cervical wound infection. Dashed lines represent asymmetric confidence limits equivalent to 1 SE. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Instantaneous risk of cervical anastomotic leak. Depiction is as in Figure 3. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Instantaneous risk of anastomotic dilatation. Depiction is as in Figure 3. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cumulative number of anastomotic dilatations. This repeated-events depiction presents the average number of dilatations per patient.6 Otherwise, the format is as in Figure 2. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Electronic Figure 1 Freedom from cervical anastomotic leak. Depiction is as in Figure 2. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Electronic Figure 2 Freedom from anastomotic dilatation. Depiction is as in Figure 2. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Electronic Figure 3 Instantaneous risk of dilatation. This repeated-events depiction presents number of dilatations per patient per month. Depiction is as in Figure 3. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Electronic Figure 4 Survival. Depiction is as in Figure 2. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Electronic Figure 5 Instantaneous risk of death. Depiction is as in Figure 2. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 623-631DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.024) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions