Geocoding of 2007 WMATA Rail Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Reimbursement Incentive Plan (TRIP)
Advertisements

FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Before-and-After Studies – Examples Session 12 Interstate MAX LRT in Portland Joe Recker,
GIS and Transportation Planning
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
1 Item 9: (DRAFT) Briefing on the Draft Update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell DTP Presentation to the.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Lecture 5 Geocoding. What is geocoding? the process of transforming a description of a location—such as a pair of coordinates, an address, or a name of.
Radius Search.  Radius searches allow you to retrieve properties that fall within a selected radius around a subject property. Furthermore, you can select.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by Scott Seeburger, Myung Sung, Dave Schmitt & Peter Haliburton November 20, Tri-Rail On-Board Survey.
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
WMATA BRT Marketing and Branding Presentation Rapid Transit Steering Committee April 30, 2013 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
0 GIS Applications for Origin- Destination Surveys Greg Spitz and John Lobb Resource Systems Group Daniel Jacobs MTA.
2008 Regional Bus Survey Preliminary Results Presentation to the Access for All Advisory Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director April.
Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Version 2.3 Travel Model Update Presentation to the Travel Forecasting Subcommittee Ron Milone and Mark Moran National Capital Region Transportation Planning.
Item 14 Re view of Budget and Outline for the FY2015 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) 1 Gerald Miller Acting Co-Director Department of Transportation.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Survey Applied Research.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
GRAPHING RELATIONSHIPS For each graph, determine the graphing relationship and record it on a white board.
Lab 6: Geocoding You have received a dBase file that contains the address list of over 500 homes in your neighborhood that have had reports of lead poisoning.
Paratransit Fare Increase Scott Wisner Valley Metro, customer service manager Phoenix, AZ.
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING MAJOR IN TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JOHN IVAN P. GUEVARRA.
Geocoding Addresses Ming-Chun Lee.
To see this in PennWorks...click here
Texas Woman’s University Business Travel
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber February 16, 2011
Central Maryland Transit Development Plan
Thank you for bringing us to where we are
Airport and Ground Access Choice Modeling
The Geographic Support System Initiative (GSSI)
Districtwide Passenger Origin & Destination (O & D) Surveys 2015 Planning & Development Committee November 01, 2016.
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Technical Committee Item # 9
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Use of Transportation Network Companies among MARTA Patrons
Paratransit Fare Increase
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
D Line Station Plan Overview
To see this in PennWorks...click here
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Paratransit Fare Increase
Where Transit Riders LIVE by TAZ BJCTA On-Board Transit Survey
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Seattle Transportation Benefit District
Word Work List ____________ Name____________
Valley Metro Accessibility Advisory Group (VMAAG) Meeting
Transit Survey White Paper
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Geocoding of 2007 WMATA Rail Survey Travel Forecasting Subcommittee July 18, 2008 Clara Reschovsky

2007 WMATA Rail Survey Period of study: April 17 - June 22, 2007 Forms distributed to 1 in 3 riders Response rate – 25% Completed questionnaires – 66,321 84% home based trips

Data Collection 12 Data Items Station receiving card Origin/Destination purpose Mode of access/egress Fare type Exit Station Home Jurisdiction Home address Home Zipcode Vehicles available Federal government employee Transit benefits

Geocoding Process Total records: 66,321 49,743 (69%) had some home geographic information Data inputs: Structure number, Street name, Zip, Jurisdiction of residence Used Navteq streets as base map Half auto-matched Misspellings, missing Struct. #s, missing Street types

Manual Geocoding Hired temporary geocoding clerk fixed misspellings used zip codes & Jurisdiction of Residence use internet mapping services added missing street types added missing directionals/quadrants quality control check for jurisdiction of residence Matched (or marked out of the region) an additional 21,262 records used zip codes & Jurisdiction of Residence to narrow search for ambiguous addresses Matched (or marked out of the region) an additional 21,262 records - fixed misspellings - used zip codes & Jurisdiction of Residence - use internet mapping services - added missing street types - added missing directionals/quadrants - quality control check for jurisdiction of residence

Allocation Process Step 1: Generate allocation file by creating variables for home station and mode of access to home station Step 2: allocate records with partial addresses Step 3: fully allocate records without address info Home Metro Station is created based off of trip purpose. If a respondent is coming from home than the station they board at is their home station and if the respondent is going home, than their destination station is their home station. 84% of riders were either coming from or going to their home. Access to home station is created by the same process once the home station is determined. Their mode of access or eggress to/from that home station becomes their mode of access to MetroRail.

Allocation Process: Step 2 2,367 records with partial address information allocated using a combination of the following variables Street (entire street name) Street Name (1st 4 Characters) Residential Zip Mode of Access to home station Home MetroRail Station Jurisdiction of residence

Allocation Process: Step 3 18,527 records contained no geographic residential information Have to allocate from fewer variables Mode of Access to home station Home MetroRail Station Jurisdiction of Residence

Results Prevalence of Metro usage by TAZ Summarized by home TAZ (includes non home based trips) Intensity of use Light blue = about 5 metro rail trip for every 100 persons per day green= about 19 trip for every for every 100 persons per day Orange= about 38 trip for every 100 persons per day Yellow= about 75 trips for every 100 persons per day Red = 1 or more metrorail trips per day per person

Results cont’d Prevalence of Metro usage by TAZ for area served by MetroRail

Results cont’d Prevalence of Metro usage by TAZ for riders who walk to their home station Oppurtunities for additional development on orange line to new carrollton