Glaucoma Progression after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Melissa B Daluvoy MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Edwin S Chen, Kristin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group
Advertisements

Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Retrospective comparison of staged versus combined cataract surgery and Descemet’s-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with Fuchs’ Dystrophy.
Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.
Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**
Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Corneal Densitometry and Visual Outcome Comparisons of DSAEK and DMEK Eyes Xiaolin Zhang MD Robert L. Schultze MD Robert A. Eden MD Rahul Raghu.
Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis and Silicone Oil for the Treatment of Hypotony in Prephthisis Kristiana D. Neff 1, William I. Sawyer 2, Michael R. Petersen.
Elvin H. Yildiz, Elisabeth J. Cohen, Ajoy S. Virdi, Kristin M. Hammersmith, Peter R Laibson, and Christopher J. Rapuano Cornea Service, Wills Eye Institute,
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Penetrating Keratoplasty vs. Deep Lamellar Keratoplasty in Macular Dystrophy: Case Report Amit Patel MRCOphth, Harish Nayak MRCOphth, Vinod Kumar FRCSEd(Ophth)
Irido-Corneal Adhesions and Fibrous Ingrowth into the Graft-Host Interface Causing Graft Failure in a Case of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial.
OCULAR HYPERTENSION AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY F Orucov, E Strassman, D Landau, J Frucht-Pery and A Solomon, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew.
Lori Lombardi MD, Mark A. Terry MD, Neda Shamie MD, Anand K. Shah MD, Daniel J. Friend MS *Dr. Terry has a financial interest in Bausch & Lomb instruments.
Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Claire Y. Chu, MD Pawan Prasher, MD Eric Dai, MD R. Wayne Bowman, MD V. Vinod.
Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
DSAEK Outcomes in Normal and Abnormal, High-Risk Eyes at an University Practice Hugo Y. Hsu and Sean L. Edelstein The authors have no financial interest.
Case Report of Severe Haze After DSAEK
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with Toxic anterior segment syndrome induced endothelial failure First and Presenting.
Combined Phacoemulsification and Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery Leonidas Traipe, M.D. Felipe Valenzuela, M.D. Carlos Nieme, M.D Juan Stoppel,
1 Clinical Outcomes of DSEK Surgery Combined With Other Intraocular Procedures Neil Mahesh Vyas, MD Fei Yu, PhD Anthony J. Aldave, MD Sophie Deng, MD,
Epithelial Ingrowth Following Endothelial Keratoplasty Ritika Dalal, DNB Robert S. Feder, MD, Irving Raber, MD, Steven P. Dunn, MD, Robert Weisenthal,
Severity of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus: Onset at Younger Than 60 Years Versus 60 Years or Older Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Amir Dayan, Christopher.
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
E-Poster Price Vision Group & Cornea Research Foundation of America Descemet - Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty :Survival Outcomes in Eyes with Pre-
Mean Keratometry Measurement Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Jacky Yeung MSc MD, Stephanie Baxter MD FRCS(C) Department of Ophthalmology, Hotel Dieu Hospital,
Combined cataract surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in patients with glaucoma without prior incisional glaucoma surgery Matthew P. Traynor,
Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome After Lamellar Corneal Transplant: Two Case Reports Timothy Y. Chou, MD, Sujata P. Prabhu, MD, Justin Dexter, MD Department of.
J. Brian Foster, MD No Financial Disclosures
Incidence of Cataract Extraction After Corneal Transplantation in Young and Middle-Aged Patients Revathi Naadimuthu, MD Gerald W. Zaidman, MD Brandon Mirochnik,
Daniel D. Hayes, MD1; Carolyn Y. Shih, MD1; David C
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
Etiological and decision making factors for repeat DSAEK or PK in cases of failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty First and Presenting.
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Post-Operative Management of Vitreous Adhesion after DSAEK with YAG Laser Vitreolysis Sherif Idris 1, Ahmed Al-Ghoul 2 MD FRCSC DipABO 1 University of.
Elmira Baghdasaryan1,2, M.D. Sophie X. Deng1, M.D., Ph.D.
Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty by novice endothelial keratoplasty surgeons Jason W. Much, M.D. 1 Paul M. Phillips, M.D. 1,2 Leslie.
Predicting Visual Acuity after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty using Corneal Topography, Pachymetry and Posterior Curvature Asymmetry Indices.
Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with prior Trabeculectomy or Tube shunt surgery. Thadani S.M. Fynn-Thompson N. Authors.
0 Case Study Conflict of Interest Learning on the Job What your Patients Should Know.
Effect of Donor Processing and Storage Time and Preoperative Endothelial Cell Counts on DSAEK Detachment Rates Daniel Demsey BScE Stephanie Baxter MD,
Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A,
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010
Special considerations for DSEK in monocameral eyes
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Anil Vedula MD Financial Disclosures: None Richard M. Awdeh MD
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
No Financial Interest in Study Material
Effects of Donor Age and Other Factors For Graft Dislocation Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Carver AA, Chen GW, Stone DU Department.
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
Comparison of Post-operative Pachymetry After Penetrating Keratoplasty Using Prednisolone Acetate 1% Versus Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% E. Lillian Cheng,
Long term Results of Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with failed penetrating Keratoplasty Maoz D. Amiran, MD, Raneen Shehadeh-Mashor, MD, Marie Eve.
Role of HSV Infection in the Histopathology of Failed DSAEK
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
Postoperative Complications Following Descemet-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Prior Glaucoma Surgery Melissa B Daluvoy.
Japanese Red Cross Society
Francis Char DeCroos, MD
Presentation transcript:

Glaucoma Progression after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Neelofar Ghaznawi MD, Melissa B Daluvoy MD, Ajoy Virdi MD, Edwin S Chen, Kristin M Hammersmith MD, Christopher J Rapuano MD The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this presentation

Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty DSEK provides rapid healing, predictable refractive outcomes, and tectonic stability. Evolution of DSEK technique has resulted in better visual outcomes and fewer post-operative complications. DSEK has become the preferred treatment for any endothelial dysfunction. The indications for DSEK have expanded from Fuchs Dystrophy and PBK, failed PK, aphakic bullous keratopathy, aniridia, ICE syndromes and CHED.

Purpose and Design Purpose 51 22 Glaucoma 29 Control 12 Surgical To characterize the pattern of glaucoma progression after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in patients without preexisting glaucoma and in those with preexisting glaucoma with and without prior glaucoma surgery To compare visual outcomes among the 3 groups 51 DSAEK 22 Glaucoma 29 Control 12 Surgical 10 Medical Outcome Measures Visual Acuity IOP Steroid dose IOP lowering medications Rejection Glaucoma procedures Little is known regarding the incidence of glaucoma and its effect on visual outcome after DSAEK. Preexisting glaucoma was defined as any of the following: documented history of glaucoma, preoperative use of anti glaucomatous medications and preoperative IOP >24, of C/D > 0.6. Post operative IOP increase was defined as any initiation or increase in anti glaucomatous medications or IOP > 25 or a relative increase in IOP >10 mmHg above baseline

Summary of Demographics and Baseline Characteristics Demographics/ Baseline Characteristics Controls (29 eyes) Glaucoma (Medical) ( 10 eyes) (Surgical) (12 eyes) p values OD:OS 16:13 7:3 5:7 0.55 % Caucasian 89% 100% 86% 0.07 % Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy 77% 30% 29% .0001 Preoperative VA (median [min, max]) 20/100 (20/25, CF) 20/400 (20/50, CF) 20/400 (20/100, CF) .003 Preoperative IOP (mmHg, median [min, max] 13 (8,22) 15 (12,18) 11 (5,17) .013 Cup-to- disc ratio 0.30 (0.2-0.65) 0.49 (0.2-0.6) 0.65 (0.35-0.9) There are some significant differences between the two group. 1)Although differences in preoperative IOP were not statistically significant, important and significant differences were in the indications for DSAEK, preoperative vision and Cup to disc ratio

Results 2 Surgical Medical Control p< .05 p< .05 p< .05 Initiation or Increase in Glaucoma Medications Incidence of IOP Elevation p< .05 p< .05 Use of a Less Potent Steroid 2 Glaucoma Procedures Surgical Medical Control Incidence of post op IOP elevation at any point during study. IOP elevation again defined as IOP greater than or equal to 24 or 10 mmHg above baseline at any point during the follow up period. 21% of patients with out any history of glaucoma experienced at least one episode of elevated IOP. Which was significantly lower than either the medically managed glaucoma group and those with prior glaucoma surgeries. p< .05

Percentage of Control Eyes With Elevated IOP Over the course of the of follow up, the percentage of eyes without elevated IOP remained consistently above 84 % with the peak incidence of glaucoma occurring at 4-5 months post operatively

Final Visual Outcomes in Subgroups VA Median (min, max) Without Preexisting Glaucoma N=29 With Preexisting N=10 With Prior Glaucoma Surgeries N=12 P Value Preoperative 20/100 (20/25, CF) 20/400 (20/50, CF) 20/400 (20/100, CF) 0.003 1 year 20/40 (20/25, 20/400) 20/50 (20/40, 20/70) 20/60 (20/25, 20/400) 0.112 Median lines of improvement 5.3 5.5 5.2 0.979 1 year compared to baseline P< 0.0001 All 3 groups gained statistically significant improvement in vision at 12 months compared with baseline. Compared with controls the patients with pre existing glaucoma had poorer median VA at baseline but showed comparable vision at 12 months. Furthermore, all groups gained about 5 lines of vision, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions Incidence of elevated IOP after DSEK: Without preexisting glaucoma: 21% With glaucoma and no h/o surgery: 50% With glaucoma and prior surgery: 42% At 1 year follow up glaucoma medication added in: 5 % of patients without glaucoma 50 % of patients with medically managed glaucoma 13% of patients with prior glaucoma surgery At 1 year 17% of patients with prior surgery required an additional glaucoma drainage procedure. All groups gained statistically significant improvement in VA at 12 months compared with baseline

Conclusions Given high incidence of post operative IOP elevation, close monitoring of IOP is warranted. Preexisting glaucoma does not negatively affect improvement of VA after DSEK.

References Chien AM, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ. Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1193:115:711-714 Goldber DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1981:92:372-7. Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, Muehlberg SM, Coster DL. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival; report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 403 414 Suh LH, Yoo, SH, Deobhakta A, Donaldson KE, Alfonso EC, Culbertson WW, O’Brien TP. Complication of descemet’s stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: Survey of 118 at one institute. Ophthalmology; 2008; 115:1517-1724 Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: A simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:1179-1186 Terry MA. Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): A laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea. 2006; 25: 926-932 Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: The influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1 year cell counts. Cornea 2008; 27:1131-1137 Vajaranant TS, Price, MO, Price WP. Visual acuity and IOP after DSEK in eyes with and without glaucoma. Ophthalmology; 116:1644-1650 Price MO, Price FW Jr, Trespalacios R. Endothelial keratoplasty of aniridic aphakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:376-379 Wylegala E, Tarnawska D. Management of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy by combined Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008; 34:1708-1714