Ways to Attack an Argument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Value/Criterion Debate and Voters. Aaron Overheim.
Advertisements

Strategies for Effective Argument Problem/Solution Part 1.
Crossfire CODEY HAWKINS UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA 2015 GEORGIA DEBATE INSTITUTES.
PROCESS How to Evaluate an Argument. Step #1 What is the subject?
ReviewJeopardy Public Forum Research Logic Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Potpourri Argument Final Jeopardy.
Claims, argument & support Booth and other sources 1.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Lincoln-Douglas Debate RefutationRefutation. Step One: Briefly restate your opponent’s argument. The purpose of restating is to provide geographic marker.
ARGUMENTS. WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? An argument consist of two or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion.
EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture To synthesize means to weave together different materials.
Argumentation.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
1 Refutation 1. Definition - the act of revealing weaknesses in arguments, or of proving an argument to be false or erroneous. 2. Strategic Steps Step.
Fallacious reasoning is “false thinking.” People use fallacious reasoning when they draw incorrect or false conclusions. Fallacious reasoning may be either.
“Analysis” Training Session 6 Feb Why do I need analysis? Most of the things debaters say are true (or at least plausible) Therefore both sides.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
REFUTATION. CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IS JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF THE GOOD IT CAN DO FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. DURING THE 1960’S, THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT DID.
“Comparative Analysis” Training Session 28 Feb 2014.
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
Debate Terminology Week 4
Refuting, Attacking, and Cross-Examination
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Argumentation.
Reading and Writing Arguments
Counterclaim/Rebuttal Example
Errors in Reasoning.
Some say this is difficult, but in reality, it’s really very simple.
Logical fallacies.
Introduction to Rhetoric
Everything’s An Argument
Errors in Reasoning.
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
How do we evaluate an argument for effectiveness?
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
Chapter 3 Speech Ethics.
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
در تجزیه و تحلیل شغل باید به 3 سوال اساسی پاسخ دهیم Job analysis تعریف کارشکافی، مطالعه و ثبت جنبه های مشخص و اساسی هر یک از مشاغل عبارتست از مراحلی.
Objections to the Design Argument
Debate.
How to Write a Conclusion to a Persuasive Essay
Negative Strategies.
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Terms to know and how to apply them
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
Let’s talk cross-ex!.
Using Principles of Logic to Strengthen Argument Writing
Team Policy Debate Popular Debate Format.
Dustin Hurley Medina Valley HS
Notes on Argument.
Opposing Claim and Rebuttal
Paper 1 _____________ Question 2 And last but not least, I’ll be
No Warmup You need: Your binder Worksheet from the back
D13 – Bellringer Now, we are going to take our latest former argument, Animal Testing, and argue from the opposite perspective! Take 10 minutes to prepare,
D14 – Bellringer Make sure that you have contacted your chosen school / competition, so that we can move forward with specific competitions and goals.
DEBATE So you like to argue?.
D11 – Bellringer Which of the following topics is most interesting to you? Let’s pick one, research, and debate! (20 minute research, 15 to debate!) Format:
Negative Attacks.
Logical fallacies.
Opposing Claim and Rebuttal
CERCA Argumentative Structure
Goal Setting Life skills continued.
Claim making: In one sentence explain the cause for the stark differences between these settlements.
Writing Extensions.
Debate Conventions Not rules, but expectations about
Cross Examination Strategies
Debate.
Presentation transcript:

Ways to Attack an Argument Is there a contradiction within the case? Does any argument assume that something is inherently good? Is the argument realistic? Is the argument supported by a quote from a credible source? Is more harm produced than good?

Ways to Attack an Argument Are there impacts to the argument your opponent has failed to recognize? Can your side of the resolution actually do a better job of achieving the value or benefits your opponent claims? Is your opponent guilty of using fallacies of reasoning?