Status of energy deposition studies IR7

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
I. Strasik et al. ● Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in FAIR Synchrotron SIS 100 ● CERN Halo Collimation of Proton and Ion Beams in.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
Concept of a Collimation System with Enhanced Operational Stability and Performance.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Ion operation and beam losses H. Braun, R. Bruce, S. Gilardoni, J.Jowett CERN - AB/ABP.
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
FLUKA dose and fluence simulations for CBM experiment I.Kadenko, O.Bezshyyko, V.Pluyko, V.Shevchenko National Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev.
1 PAST ESTIMATIONS ON THE ROLE OF PASSIVE ABSORBERS Francesco Cerutti for the team 2012 June 4th.
Preparation of Review R. Assmann et al CWG, CWG R. Assmann.
Brainstorming on the field model: MAS activities P. Hagen, E. Todesco, J.P. Koutchouk CERN, 24 h March 2006 Field quality Working Group.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Flair development for the MC TPS Wioletta Kozłowska CERN / Medical University of Vienna.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Overview of FLUKA Energy Deposition and Design Studies for the LHC Overview of FLUKA Energy Deposition and Design Studies for the LHC M. Brugger, F. Cerutti,
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Status of the magnet studies in the ARCS (FLUKA)
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
News and Introduction from CERN June 15th, 2005
Lattice for Collimation
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
On behalf of the FLUKA team
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
Progress in Collimation study
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
Simulations of the response of the KLOE electromagnetic
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Beam collimation for SPPC
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
The 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC13
Assessment of BLM thresholds at cold magnets
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Collimation for beta-beams
LHC Collimation Requirements
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Discussion of High Energy Proton Losses in Arc 7
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Study of Beam Losses and Collimation in JLEIC
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Presentation transcript:

Status of energy deposition studies IR7 A. Ferrari, M. Magistris, M. Santana, M. Silari, V. Vlachoudis Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004

Overview Introduction to beam collimation Main issues to be studied New features of FLUKA Implementation of the geometry Future work This talk is a status report of a work in progress. No results are available at the moment. The FLUKA input is ready and debugged, simulations are starting the first week of July.

Two warm LHC insertions dedicated to cleaning IR3, IR7 Collimation systems: Momentum and betatron cleaning Two beams

Principle of beam collimation IR7 Cleaning with collimators (warm) RR RR Dispersion suppressor (SC) π,e,p π,e,p π,e,p Beam 1 Primary collimators Damage? Secondary collimators Damage? SC magnets Quench?

Issues to be studied Energy deposition in collimators and downstream Damage to equipment in cleaning insertions Energy deposition in SC magnets in DS section Damage/perturbation to electronic equipment and cables Position of absorbers to cure problems These issues can be studied by means of the MC cascade code FLUKA.

FLUKA physics Physical models available for cross-checking: FLUKA standard model DPMJET 2.5 DPMJET 3 Possibility of simulating ions Single scattering for incident particles at grazing angle

FLUKA geometry New features of the latest version : repetition of objects according to symmetry transformation (rotation, translation, reflection, or combination of these). assignment of names to bodies and regions. These features allow implementing a complex geometry with a modular approach.

Advantages of the modular approach Time optimisation IR7 (more than 200 major components) can be implemented with less than 20 prototypes. Maintenance Any improvement in the prototype geometry applies to all replica in the tunnel. A new component can be added without modification of the existing geometry. Avoid duplicating efforts Every module can be used or modified by different users for future studies.

Prototypes Collimators, dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, multipoles MB MQT

Reflection: MQW Vertical and Horizontal

Rotation and run-time corrections: Primary and secondary collimators Rotation around the beam direction and the vertical axis Jaw material (carbon, metal) Collimation gap and misalignment (run-time)

Additional components Beam Loss Monitors (air volume). Vacuum pipes (need for definition of bake-out equipment close to pipe  AT/VAC). Tunnel walls and estimates for cables. Electronic equipment in RR’s (K. Tsoulou).

A “flexible” geometry The magnetic fields and the beam loss distribution are described in user written routines. A specifically written program creates automatically the full geometry from an on-line file. Any change in component position, collimator rotation or jaw misalignment is automatically implemented. With minimal modifications, the same program can be used to implement different sections of LHC.

Special techniques and physics options Biasing techniques (“Russian roulette”, splitting, leading particle biasing and region importance) Energy threshold Electromagnetic cascade Particles to be tracked These options must be defined by the user according to the specific case studied.

IR7, Straight section

Summary Large initial effort to set up flexible and complete model of IR7 and cold dispersion suppressor. The straight section of IR7 is fully implemented. Prototypes and magnetic field of all components in DS have been implemented  adjusting positions. Full simulations starting first week of July. First complete picture: end of July.