PARCA Security and Termination Amounts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Review Group th September 2008.
PARCA: Contractual Overview TX Workgroup 27 th February 2013 Steve Pownall.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 06 November 2008.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Review Group 221 Session 3: 13 October Introduction  During this presentation we will seek views on the following questions.  What should the.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
© Energy UK April 2012 Transmission Workgroup – 4 th April Financial Commitment for Incremental Capacity Presentation by Energy UK
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Force Majeure - Capacity Transmission Workstream 2 July 2009.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Project Nexus Workgroup – Invoicing 11 th August 2014.
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Strawman Transmission Workstream 4 th May 2006.
Entry Capacity Trading Transmission Work Stream, 5 April 2007.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Performance Assurance 21st May Incentives. USRV’s – Incentive Regime Charges are based on a range of standards USRV Period runs from 21 st of one month.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
PARCA Demonstration Data Information Flow Diagram Footnote:- No set timescales – timescales will be agreed by the Project Team Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2.
Mod 376: Increased Choice when Applying for Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Jeff Chandler - 5 th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon 1.
NTS Exit Regime Transmission Workstream – 6 th July 2005.
Www2.nationalgrid.com/bsuos An Introduction to Balancing Services Use of System Charging (BSUOS)
Interactions with the implementation of RIIO-T1
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement
An alternative approach…..
User Pays Funding – Potential Licence Mechanism
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
Transmission Workgroup 4th October 2012
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
An Introduction to Balancing Services Use of System Charging (BSUOS)
Removal of a Users ability to allow Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity to lapse Chris Shanley.
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime - draft MOD principles
TSC Modifications Panel Meeting
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
Mod 621A Supporting analysis
Modification 0117 – Additional Considerations
Transmission Workgroup June 7th 2012
Draft Capacity & Connection Plan
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Simon Trivella –5th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
Jeff Chandler - 3rd October 2013 UNC Tx Workgroup
Modification 501 slides for Workgroup
Flow Swap Scenarios – Agreed Logic
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Transmission Workstream – Partial Assignment
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
Review Group 221: Review of Questions from Session 2
Exit Overruns in the Enduring Regime
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Presentation transcript:

PARCA Security and Termination Amounts Option for Using a consistent approach under the PARCA Regime Transmission Workgroup 28 August 2013

Agenda Option for applying a consistent methodology for the calculation of security / termination amounts for PARCA Phase 2 Rationale Calculation for Entry and Exit Phasing of Security Funding Examples Funding / Charging impact

Why consider a change in the approach? This option is based on a single revenue driver Based on RIIO-T1 rules for additional funding allowances To provide a consistent approach for all Applicants irrespective of whether investment is needed Divorces costs from security and moving to capacity based calculation Provides one method of calculation based on capacity Familiar calculation used in User Commitment

Calculation of Security Amount - Entry Based on User Commitment principles already established For Entry Total PARCA Security Amount Entry (£) = (PARCAEnind1 / 100 x Qen1) + (PARCAEnind2 /100 x Qen2) + (PARCAEnind3 / 100 x Qen3) + (PARCAEnind4 / 100 x Qen4)……+ (PARCAEnindn / 100 x Qenn) Where: PARCAEnind = the indicative clearing price for each individual quarter for the Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity requested for Quarters 1 to n where n is the last quarter of capacity requested and confirmed by the PARCA Applicant. Qen = total Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity quantity requested in the PARCA for each day for each quarter, for the first quarter up to and including the last quarter, n, for which capacity is requested. n = a maximum of 32 quarters

Calculation of Security Amount - Exit Based on User Commitment principles already established For Exit Total PARCA Security Amount Exit (£) = PARCAExind / 100 x Qex x (365*4+1) Where: PARCAExind = the indicative NTS Exit Capacity price (p/kWh/Day) for the relevant Enduring Annual NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity at the NTS Exit Point included in the Phase 1 PARCA Works Report. (Note: This price may differ from the actual price determined at a later date and used to calculate actual transportation charges) Qex = the maximum amount of Enduring Annual NTS Exit (Flat) Capacity to be Reserved by the PARCA Applicant (kWh/Day) as specified in the Phase 1 PARCA Works Report

Security Amount - Phasing The Security Amount phasing required to be put in place the PARCA Applicant will be over a maximum of [four] years and will be based on the following cumulative profile: Year1 = [25%] x Security Amount Year2 = [50%] x Security Amount Year3 = [75%] x Security Amount Year4 = [100%] x Security Amount Where Year1 = the financial year (1 April to 31 March) in which the PARCA is signed and progression into Phase 2 is confirmed

Security Amount - Phasing Security will only be required up to Capacity Allocation. Should Phase 2 complete earlier than [four] years then only the amount up to that point will be required as security E.g. if Allocation of capacity took place in Year 3, then at that point in time the security will equal [75%] and the additional amount for Year 4 will not be required. If Phase 2 goes beyond [four] years the security will remain at 100% until allocation Upon Capacity Allocation the requirement to put in place security for Phase 2 will cease and existing UNC requirements are applied

Security Amount – Providing Cover PARCA Applicants will be required to post security to cover the Security Amount Security can be provided in accordance with existing UNC requirements In the event of termination, the value of the security amount will be invoiced to the PARCA Applicant In the event of non payment, security can be used

Funding Where investment is required this would follow the existing RIIO-T1 revenue driver timescales 20% of the value of the Revenue Driver in Year T-2 80% of the value of the Revenue Driver in Year T-1 To implement this would require some changes to ensure: That there is minimal impact on Industry charges overall National Grid’s Allowed Revenue can be amended to be kept neutral in the event of a Termination

Termination during Phase 2 - Examples Example 1 - Termination where costs are lower than security

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 PARCA requires customer to put in place £7m security per year £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £7m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564 -£5.564 NG spends £10m over two years The Totex Incentive Mechanism (TIM) compares expenditure against allowances and makes an adjustment to allowed revenues. Considers each year as a £5m overspend as there is no revenue allowance at this stage There is no allowance as this doesn’t get triggered until allocation

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £7m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564 -£5.564 Termination charge £14m -£14m Customer terminates so must pay a Termination amount equivalent to the security accrued so far

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £7m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564m -£5.564m Termination charge £14m -£14m +£14m Allowance adjustment £4.436m +£4.436m -£4.436m Adjustment is made to allowed revenue to pass termination charge through to industry As the PARCA is terminated, NG recovers the efficiently incurred costs, multiplied by the TIM efficiency rate to recognise the amount already received

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £7m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564m -£5.564m Termination charge £14m -£14m +£14m Allowance adjustment £4.436m +£4.436m -£4.436m FINAL POSITION Neutral +£4m

Termination during Phase 2 - Examples Example 2 - Termination where costs are greater than security

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 PARCA requires customer to put in place £2.5m security per year £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £2.5m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564 -£5.564 NG spends £10m over two years The Totex Incentive Mechanism (TIM) compares expenditure against allowances and makes an adjustment to allowed revenues. Considers each year as a £5m overspend as there is no revenue allowance at this stage There is no allowance as this doesn’t get triggered until allocation

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £2.5m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564 -£5.564 Termination charge -£5m Customer terminates so must pay a Termination amount equivalent to the security accrued so far

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £2.5m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564m -£5.564m Termination charge -£5m +£5m Allowance adjustment £4.436m +£4.436m -£4.436m Adjustment is made to allowed revenue to pass termination charge through to industry As the PARCA is terminated, NG recovers the efficiently incurred costs, multiplied by the TIM efficiency rate to recognise the amount already received

PARCA Applicant terminates Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 £5m spent £5m spent Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 NG Total Customer Industry Customer Security £2.5m NG spends £5m -£10m Allowance £0m NG receives through TIM £2.782m +£5.564m -£5.564m Termination charge -£5m +£5m Allowance adjustment £4.436m +£4.436m -£4.436m FINAL POSITION Neutral