Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Advertisements

Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of the Pap Epigenetic Switch by CpxAR
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Jeffrey W Roberts, Christine W Roberts  Cell 
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
LexA Cleavage Is Required for CTX Prophage Induction
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Michael Kruppa, Robyn D Moir, David Kolodrubetz, Ian M Willis 
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 1996)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Accurate Translocation of mRNA by the Ribosome Requires a Peptidyl Group or Its Analog on the tRNA Moving into the 30S P Site  Kurt Fredrick, Harry F.
Nicholas R. Pannunzio, Michael R. Lieber  Cell Reports 
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Nucleoid Proteins Stimulate Stringently Controlled Bacterial Promoters
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Michael T Marr, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Presentation transcript:

Transcriptional Interference between Convergent Promoters Caused by Elongation over the Promoter  Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell  Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 647-656 (June 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.010

Figure 1 Convergent Promoters from the Developmental Switches of Bacteriophage 186 and P2 A. DNA sequence of 186 convergent promoters pR and pL and details of the fragment used (Dodd et al., 1990). Bent arrows indicate the start sites of transcription, predicted −10 and −35 hexamers are boxed and the promoter mutations used are indicated. The sequences of the NheI promoter fragments used to clone combinations of 186 and P2 promoters in Figure 4 are also shown. B. DNA sequence of P2 convergent promoters pe and pc and details of the fragment used. Start sites (+1) of pe and pc transcription were determined by primer extension (A. A. Berg, personal communication) Molecular Cell 2004 14, 647-656DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.010)

Figure 2 Promoter Activities of Constructs Testing pR Interference of pL Transcription Experiments test A. wild-type promoter activities, B. increased spacing, C. divergent transcription, D. divergent antisense transcription, E. clipped overlapping convergent transcription, F. insertion of tA− DNA, and G. insertion of tA+ DNA. The transcriptional activities of the indicated constructs were measured by LacZ assay of strains containing the appropriate λRS45ΔYA-pBC2-lacZ prophage. λRS45ΔYA-pBC2RIII-lacZ prophages containing a RNaseIII cleavage site (indicated as scissors on RNA) between the promoter inserts and lacZ were used in experiment E and for all rightward activities. The RNaseIII cleavage site is reported to reduce potential context effects from different constructs (Linn and St.Pierre, 1990) and was used such that the effect of tA+ on rightward activity could be more accurately determined. Leftward values indicate the LacZ activities of constructs with pL expressing LacZ in the presence of active pR (pR+) or inactive pR (pR−). Rightward values are the LacZ activities of constructs with pR expressing LacZ (some values not determined, n.d.). For each experiment the fold interference was calculated as the ratio of pR− and pR+ leftward activities, as described in Experimental Procedures. In the construct diagrams, numbers above the line indicate the position from the +1 site of pR and numbers below the line indicate the position from the +1 of pL. Wavy lines indicate transcripts from pR or pL. Regions of pL/pR transcript complementarity are indicated by black wavy lines. Relevant BamHI (B) and SmaI (S) restriction sites are indicated. tA+ indicates an active trpA terminator and tA− is the mutated trpA terminator. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 647-656DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.010)

Figure 3 In Vitro Transcription of pR, pL and pc A. Diagram of some of the templates used for in vitro transcription. pBC1 is a cloning vector we constructed to facilitate the provision of supercoiled templates for this study. For the representatives shown, pBC1.pRpL carried an insert of the phage 186 DNA fragment bearing wild-type pR and pL in the native arrangement (Figure 1A) and pBC1.pc pe-, an insert bearing wild-type pc and mutated pe in their native arrangement (Figure 1B). Expected sizes of the relevant transcripts produced from each plasmid are shown. B. In vitro transcript pattern obtained for templates pBC1 only, pBC1.pRpL, pBC1.pRpL−, pBC1.pR−pL, pBC1.pcpe− and pBC1.pc−pe− (lanes 1 to 6, respectively). In vitro transcription assays were performed in 10 μl volumes for each template as described in Experimental Procedures. RNAP and DNA was pre-incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow maximum open complex formation at all relevant promoters and elongation was terminated after 60 min to allow complete firing and elongation from all relevant promoters. C. Rate of formation of active heparin resistant complexes at pL(pR–) (triangles), pRNA1 (diamonds) and pc(pe−) (circles). 90 μl in vitro transcription reactions containing template DNA (pBC1.pR−pL or pBC1.pcpe−) were incubated at 37°C and initiated by the addition of RNAP at time 0. Aliquots of the reaction were taken at various times, added to the NTP/heparin mix (final volume 10 μl) and allowed to elongate for 60 min. The amount of relevant full-length transcripts accumulated was quantitated, and expressed as a percentage of the maximum for that transcript and then plotted against pre-incubation time. D. Rate of full length transcript production from heparin-resistant complexes formed at pR(pL-)(squares), pL(pR−)(triangles) and pc(pe-) (circles). 60 μl in vitro transcription reactions containing RNAP and DNA (pBC1.pRpL-, pBC1.pR−pL or pBC1.pe−pc) were pre-incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow complete open complex formation for all relevant promoters. Upon the addition of NTP/heparin mix, 7 μl aliquots were added to stop/load buffer at times indicated on the graph and the transcription pattern was analyzed. Relevant full-length transcripts were quantitated and plotted against elongation time. Data from two independent experiments was fitted to a first order exponential rise to a maximum using SigmaPlot v4 and from this relationship the time for 50% transcript production (t50%) was calculated. E. Rate of full length transcript production from heparin-resistant complexes formed at pR(pL−) (squares), pR(pL+) (circles), pL(pR+) (diamonds), and pL(pR−) (triangles). Details are as for Figure 3D but using templates pBC1.pRpL−, pBC1.pRpL or pBC1.pR−pL. F. In vivo potassium permanganate footprinting of open complexes at pR and pL was performed on pBC2.pLpR- and pBC2.pLpR+ templates using a primer which anneals upstream of pL. The lanes marked A, C, G and T are dideoxy sequencing reactions performed on pBC2 pLpR+ using the same primer. A second primer, annealing within the bla gene, was included in the primer extension reactions to generate the reference band. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 647-656DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.010)

Figure 4 Comparison of Interference between P2 and 186 Promoters Promoter activities measured by LacZ assay showing interference in the native P2 promoters pepc (A) and in constructs containing combinations of pe, pc, pR and pL convergent promoters, with a centrally located NheI linker between convergent promoter fragments (B-E). Details are as for Figure 2. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 647-656DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.010)